It’s the Entanglements, Stupid

The article discusses the pandemic against the backdrop of the recent globalisation of environmental history research. It proposes to view COVID-19 as an exemplary case for the conceptual challenges of the global environment. Rather than searching for the one narrative that captures the essence of t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Frank Uekötter
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Brepols Publishers 2020-01-01
Series:Journal for the History of Environment and Society
Online Access:https://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/10.1484/J.JHES.5.122467
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850029865018851328
author Frank Uekötter
author_facet Frank Uekötter
author_sort Frank Uekötter
collection DOAJ
description The article discusses the pandemic against the backdrop of the recent globalisation of environmental history research. It proposes to view COVID-19 as an exemplary case for the conceptual challenges of the global environment. Rather than searching for the one narrative that captures the essence of the pandemic, scholars should focus on the entanglements of multiple threads. The article identifies four trends that converged in the current pandemic: the global spread of the coronavirus, the efforts of the medical sciences, the global circulation of iconic pictures, and the forceful interventions of nationstates in the fight against the virus and the support of struggling peoples and economies. Each of these trends had its own set of requirements and consequences, but it was the amalgamation of these four narratives that shaped the trajectory of COVID-19 responses. The entangled narratives created a surprisingly narrow path of legitimate action, which suggests that entanglements tend to act as constraints in environmental history. This runs counter to a tendency in global history writing that cherishes entanglements as harbingers of an exuberance of possibilities. The article acknowledges the significance of national and regional differences. But scholars are encouraged to look beyond the specifics. Environmental challenges create a baseline of similarities that transcend national borders, as the current pandemic has shown. If COVID-19 is a typical case for environmental challenges in an age of globalisation, we can view the multidimensional narratives that it requires as a template for environmental history writing across the board. Against this background, the article makes the case for a new style of entangled, non-linear history writing. It discusses the challenges of non-linear histories with particular attention to the moral and methodological quagmires. It also shows how linear narratives gain a fairy tale quality in the face of a multidimensional crises. COVID-19 has opened a narrative void that environmental historians should seek to fill.
format Article
id doaj-art-8ff4ce13a7bf482c9c2d6015b1a9b893
institution DOAJ
issn 2506-6730
2506-6749
language deu
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Brepols Publishers
record_format Article
series Journal for the History of Environment and Society
spelling doaj-art-8ff4ce13a7bf482c9c2d6015b1a9b8932025-08-20T02:59:23ZdeuBrepols PublishersJournal for the History of Environment and Society2506-67302506-67492020-01-01510311110.1484/J.JHES.5.122467It’s the Entanglements, StupidFrank UekötterThe article discusses the pandemic against the backdrop of the recent globalisation of environmental history research. It proposes to view COVID-19 as an exemplary case for the conceptual challenges of the global environment. Rather than searching for the one narrative that captures the essence of the pandemic, scholars should focus on the entanglements of multiple threads. The article identifies four trends that converged in the current pandemic: the global spread of the coronavirus, the efforts of the medical sciences, the global circulation of iconic pictures, and the forceful interventions of nationstates in the fight against the virus and the support of struggling peoples and economies. Each of these trends had its own set of requirements and consequences, but it was the amalgamation of these four narratives that shaped the trajectory of COVID-19 responses. The entangled narratives created a surprisingly narrow path of legitimate action, which suggests that entanglements tend to act as constraints in environmental history. This runs counter to a tendency in global history writing that cherishes entanglements as harbingers of an exuberance of possibilities. The article acknowledges the significance of national and regional differences. But scholars are encouraged to look beyond the specifics. Environmental challenges create a baseline of similarities that transcend national borders, as the current pandemic has shown. If COVID-19 is a typical case for environmental challenges in an age of globalisation, we can view the multidimensional narratives that it requires as a template for environmental history writing across the board. Against this background, the article makes the case for a new style of entangled, non-linear history writing. It discusses the challenges of non-linear histories with particular attention to the moral and methodological quagmires. It also shows how linear narratives gain a fairy tale quality in the face of a multidimensional crises. COVID-19 has opened a narrative void that environmental historians should seek to fill.https://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/10.1484/J.JHES.5.122467
spellingShingle Frank Uekötter
It’s the Entanglements, Stupid
Journal for the History of Environment and Society
title It’s the Entanglements, Stupid
title_full It’s the Entanglements, Stupid
title_fullStr It’s the Entanglements, Stupid
title_full_unstemmed It’s the Entanglements, Stupid
title_short It’s the Entanglements, Stupid
title_sort it s the entanglements stupid
url https://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/10.1484/J.JHES.5.122467
work_keys_str_mv AT frankuekotter itstheentanglementsstupid