Comparative analysis of image mosaicing techniques for aerial agriculture field imaging

UAVs that are outfitted with advanced image sensors offer a flexible and cost-efficient means of obtaining cohesive, inclusive, and precise visual depictions of regions. The obtained visual data, however, frequently comprises fragmented data as a result of the restricted perspective of individual im...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria John, S. Santhanalakshmi, J Amudha, Jianfeng Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2025-12-01
Series:European Journal of Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/22797254.2025.2507744
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849715015777517568
author Maria John
S. Santhanalakshmi
J Amudha
Jianfeng Zhou
author_facet Maria John
S. Santhanalakshmi
J Amudha
Jianfeng Zhou
author_sort Maria John
collection DOAJ
description UAVs that are outfitted with advanced image sensors offer a flexible and cost-efficient means of obtaining cohesive, inclusive, and precise visual depictions of regions. The obtained visual data, however, frequently comprises fragmented data as a result of the restricted perspective of individual images. To address this constraint, image mosaicing techniques are utilized to seamlessly merge various images, resulting in a thorough and uninterrupted depiction of the agricultural environment. The objective of this work is to evaluate and compare image mosaicing techniques, focusing primarily on agricultural datasets. It uncovers and exposes the constraints that exist in existing algorithms. The dataset of maize crop acquired from Phantom drones in the farms of Centralia, Missouri, USA, is utilized for this work. The Aerial images are used to evaluate distinctive feature-based and direct pixel-based mosaicing methods. The research analyzes four performance metrics, which consist of the Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) and Root Mean Square (RMS) error, together with Standard Deviation (SD) and CPU computational time. Analysis of Variance was conducted for the texture features of the generated mosaics. Several experimental findings show how the accuracy-performance-visual quality relationship affects the selection of suitable methods for real-time agricultural dataset. The research findings provide knowledge to select the best mosaicing solutions that will benefit crop health assessment and yield estimation applications.
format Article
id doaj-art-8ff0596966494d6d90fc2d3fa7a8369d
institution DOAJ
issn 2279-7254
language English
publishDate 2025-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series European Journal of Remote Sensing
spelling doaj-art-8ff0596966494d6d90fc2d3fa7a8369d2025-08-20T03:13:32ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEuropean Journal of Remote Sensing2279-72542025-12-0158110.1080/22797254.2025.2507744Comparative analysis of image mosaicing techniques for aerial agriculture field imagingMaria John0S. Santhanalakshmi1J Amudha2Jianfeng Zhou3Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidhyapeetham, Bengaluru, IndiaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidhyapeetham, Bengaluru, IndiaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidhyapeetham, Bengaluru, IndiaDivision of Plant Science and Technology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USAUAVs that are outfitted with advanced image sensors offer a flexible and cost-efficient means of obtaining cohesive, inclusive, and precise visual depictions of regions. The obtained visual data, however, frequently comprises fragmented data as a result of the restricted perspective of individual images. To address this constraint, image mosaicing techniques are utilized to seamlessly merge various images, resulting in a thorough and uninterrupted depiction of the agricultural environment. The objective of this work is to evaluate and compare image mosaicing techniques, focusing primarily on agricultural datasets. It uncovers and exposes the constraints that exist in existing algorithms. The dataset of maize crop acquired from Phantom drones in the farms of Centralia, Missouri, USA, is utilized for this work. The Aerial images are used to evaluate distinctive feature-based and direct pixel-based mosaicing methods. The research analyzes four performance metrics, which consist of the Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) and Root Mean Square (RMS) error, together with Standard Deviation (SD) and CPU computational time. Analysis of Variance was conducted for the texture features of the generated mosaics. Several experimental findings show how the accuracy-performance-visual quality relationship affects the selection of suitable methods for real-time agricultural dataset. The research findings provide knowledge to select the best mosaicing solutions that will benefit crop health assessment and yield estimation applications.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/22797254.2025.2507744Image stitchingaerial imagesunmanned ariel vehicle (UAV)remote sensingagricultureprecision agriculture
spellingShingle Maria John
S. Santhanalakshmi
J Amudha
Jianfeng Zhou
Comparative analysis of image mosaicing techniques for aerial agriculture field imaging
European Journal of Remote Sensing
Image stitching
aerial images
unmanned ariel vehicle (UAV)
remote sensing
agriculture
precision agriculture
title Comparative analysis of image mosaicing techniques for aerial agriculture field imaging
title_full Comparative analysis of image mosaicing techniques for aerial agriculture field imaging
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of image mosaicing techniques for aerial agriculture field imaging
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of image mosaicing techniques for aerial agriculture field imaging
title_short Comparative analysis of image mosaicing techniques for aerial agriculture field imaging
title_sort comparative analysis of image mosaicing techniques for aerial agriculture field imaging
topic Image stitching
aerial images
unmanned ariel vehicle (UAV)
remote sensing
agriculture
precision agriculture
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/22797254.2025.2507744
work_keys_str_mv AT mariajohn comparativeanalysisofimagemosaicingtechniquesforaerialagriculturefieldimaging
AT ssanthanalakshmi comparativeanalysisofimagemosaicingtechniquesforaerialagriculturefieldimaging
AT jamudha comparativeanalysisofimagemosaicingtechniquesforaerialagriculturefieldimaging
AT jianfengzhou comparativeanalysisofimagemosaicingtechniquesforaerialagriculturefieldimaging