Comparing the Amounts of External Root Resorption during Different Modalities of Orthodontics Treatment in Root Canal Treated Teeth Having Zirconia Crown and Contralateral Teeth with Vital Pulp

Background: Different modalities of orthodontic treatment (OT) can have different amounts of external resorption of root (ERR) among root canal obturated teeth (ROT) having zirconia crowns and teeth with vital pulp (VPT). Aim: This study was carried out to evaluate ERR in different modalities of OT...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Narayana Prasad, Kanika Sharma, Nazia Anwer, Gaurav Arya, Aiyana Parthi, Ashish Kumar, Mrunal Meshram
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-05-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_607_25
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849471821991116800
author P. Narayana Prasad
Kanika Sharma
Nazia Anwer
Gaurav Arya
Aiyana Parthi
Ashish Kumar
Mrunal Meshram
author_facet P. Narayana Prasad
Kanika Sharma
Nazia Anwer
Gaurav Arya
Aiyana Parthi
Ashish Kumar
Mrunal Meshram
author_sort P. Narayana Prasad
collection DOAJ
description Background: Different modalities of orthodontic treatment (OT) can have different amounts of external resorption of root (ERR) among root canal obturated teeth (ROT) having zirconia crowns and teeth with vital pulp (VPT). Aim: This study was carried out to evaluate ERR in different modalities of OT in ROT having zirconia crowns and contralateral teeth with vital pulp. Methods and Materials: 130 patients having ROT with zirconia crowns and contralateral teeth with vital pulp undergoing OT were included. 65 patients underwent extraction orthodontic treatment (EOT), and 65 patients underwent non-extraction orthodontic treatment (NEOT). Cone beam computed tomography was used for calculating ERR. Results: The ERR values in ROT with zirconia were 0.48 ± 0.64 mm in NEOT, while the ERR values in VPT were 1.41 ± 1.20 mm in NEOT. The ERR values were greater in VPT in NEOT as well as EOT (P = 0.001). Conclusion: The external root resorption values were greater in vital teeth as compared to root obturated teeth with zirconia in different orthodontic treatment modalities.
format Article
id doaj-art-8f9e4a5c9e4e4a3bb0a0c83feba84e5c
institution Kabale University
issn 0976-4879
0975-7406
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-8f9e4a5c9e4e4a3bb0a0c83feba84e5c2025-08-20T03:24:40ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0976-48790975-74062025-05-0117Suppl 1S825S82710.4103/jpbs.jpbs_607_25Comparing the Amounts of External Root Resorption during Different Modalities of Orthodontics Treatment in Root Canal Treated Teeth Having Zirconia Crown and Contralateral Teeth with Vital PulpP. Narayana PrasadKanika SharmaNazia AnwerGaurav AryaAiyana ParthiAshish KumarMrunal MeshramBackground: Different modalities of orthodontic treatment (OT) can have different amounts of external resorption of root (ERR) among root canal obturated teeth (ROT) having zirconia crowns and teeth with vital pulp (VPT). Aim: This study was carried out to evaluate ERR in different modalities of OT in ROT having zirconia crowns and contralateral teeth with vital pulp. Methods and Materials: 130 patients having ROT with zirconia crowns and contralateral teeth with vital pulp undergoing OT were included. 65 patients underwent extraction orthodontic treatment (EOT), and 65 patients underwent non-extraction orthodontic treatment (NEOT). Cone beam computed tomography was used for calculating ERR. Results: The ERR values in ROT with zirconia were 0.48 ± 0.64 mm in NEOT, while the ERR values in VPT were 1.41 ± 1.20 mm in NEOT. The ERR values were greater in VPT in NEOT as well as EOT (P = 0.001). Conclusion: The external root resorption values were greater in vital teeth as compared to root obturated teeth with zirconia in different orthodontic treatment modalities.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_607_25external root resorptionorthodontic treatmentroot canal treated teethvital teethzirconia
spellingShingle P. Narayana Prasad
Kanika Sharma
Nazia Anwer
Gaurav Arya
Aiyana Parthi
Ashish Kumar
Mrunal Meshram
Comparing the Amounts of External Root Resorption during Different Modalities of Orthodontics Treatment in Root Canal Treated Teeth Having Zirconia Crown and Contralateral Teeth with Vital Pulp
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
external root resorption
orthodontic treatment
root canal treated teeth
vital teeth
zirconia
title Comparing the Amounts of External Root Resorption during Different Modalities of Orthodontics Treatment in Root Canal Treated Teeth Having Zirconia Crown and Contralateral Teeth with Vital Pulp
title_full Comparing the Amounts of External Root Resorption during Different Modalities of Orthodontics Treatment in Root Canal Treated Teeth Having Zirconia Crown and Contralateral Teeth with Vital Pulp
title_fullStr Comparing the Amounts of External Root Resorption during Different Modalities of Orthodontics Treatment in Root Canal Treated Teeth Having Zirconia Crown and Contralateral Teeth with Vital Pulp
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Amounts of External Root Resorption during Different Modalities of Orthodontics Treatment in Root Canal Treated Teeth Having Zirconia Crown and Contralateral Teeth with Vital Pulp
title_short Comparing the Amounts of External Root Resorption during Different Modalities of Orthodontics Treatment in Root Canal Treated Teeth Having Zirconia Crown and Contralateral Teeth with Vital Pulp
title_sort comparing the amounts of external root resorption during different modalities of orthodontics treatment in root canal treated teeth having zirconia crown and contralateral teeth with vital pulp
topic external root resorption
orthodontic treatment
root canal treated teeth
vital teeth
zirconia
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_607_25
work_keys_str_mv AT pnarayanaprasad comparingtheamountsofexternalrootresorptionduringdifferentmodalitiesoforthodonticstreatmentinrootcanaltreatedteethhavingzirconiacrownandcontralateralteethwithvitalpulp
AT kanikasharma comparingtheamountsofexternalrootresorptionduringdifferentmodalitiesoforthodonticstreatmentinrootcanaltreatedteethhavingzirconiacrownandcontralateralteethwithvitalpulp
AT naziaanwer comparingtheamountsofexternalrootresorptionduringdifferentmodalitiesoforthodonticstreatmentinrootcanaltreatedteethhavingzirconiacrownandcontralateralteethwithvitalpulp
AT gauravarya comparingtheamountsofexternalrootresorptionduringdifferentmodalitiesoforthodonticstreatmentinrootcanaltreatedteethhavingzirconiacrownandcontralateralteethwithvitalpulp
AT aiyanaparthi comparingtheamountsofexternalrootresorptionduringdifferentmodalitiesoforthodonticstreatmentinrootcanaltreatedteethhavingzirconiacrownandcontralateralteethwithvitalpulp
AT ashishkumar comparingtheamountsofexternalrootresorptionduringdifferentmodalitiesoforthodonticstreatmentinrootcanaltreatedteethhavingzirconiacrownandcontralateralteethwithvitalpulp
AT mrunalmeshram comparingtheamountsofexternalrootresorptionduringdifferentmodalitiesoforthodonticstreatmentinrootcanaltreatedteethhavingzirconiacrownandcontralateralteethwithvitalpulp