Prescribed Minimum Benefits complaints: a five-year retrospective review

Background: No matter which benefit option members have chosen, medical schemes are required by the Medical Schemes Act no. 131 of 1998 to pay costs associated with the diagnosis, treatment, or care of a specified set of benefits known as Prescribed Minimum Benefits (PMBs). Medical scheme beneficia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lindelwa Mitchele Ngobeni, Lucky Moropeng, Evelyn Thsehla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: South African Medical Association 2024-06-01
Series:South African Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://samajournals.co.za/index.php/samj/article/view/1007
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860588103598080
author Lindelwa Mitchele Ngobeni
Lucky Moropeng
Evelyn Thsehla
author_facet Lindelwa Mitchele Ngobeni
Lucky Moropeng
Evelyn Thsehla
author_sort Lindelwa Mitchele Ngobeni
collection DOAJ
description Background: No matter which benefit option members have chosen, medical schemes are required by the Medical Schemes Act no. 131 of 1998 to pay costs associated with the diagnosis, treatment, or care of a specified set of benefits known as Prescribed Minimum Benefits (PMBs). Medical scheme beneficiaries have the right to lodge complaints with the Council for Medical Schemes (CMS) when their claims are denied. Objective: To determine and describe the pattern of PMBs complaints received by CMS from January 2014 to December 2018. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study that utilised the CMS’ clinical complaints. Data for PMBs, complainants, medical scheme types, and reasons for payment denial were extracted. The CMS’ lists of chronic conditions, PMBs, and registered schemes were used to confirm PMBs and to categorise schemes as either restricted (i.e., to only members of specific organisations) or open (i.e., to all South Africans). Extracted and coded data were analysed using SAS v.9.4 software. Results: A total of 2141 complaints were retrieved and 1124 PMBs complaints were included in the study. The median of PMBs complaints per year was 225. Most of the complaints (43.6%, n=490/1124) were lodged by members themselves. Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) constituted most of the PMBs conditions that members complained about. Medicine and surgery were the services that were mostly denied full payment by medical schemes. Open medical schemes accounted for more (73.8%, n=830/1124) of the complaints. Conclusion: Chronic conditions are the main diseases that medical scheme members complained about. Member education and clear definition of PMBs should be prioritised by medical schemes and the Council for Medical Schemes.
format Article
id doaj-art-8f8d732455cf4f319a0f2151b3d756e3
institution Kabale University
issn 0256-9574
2078-5135
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher South African Medical Association
record_format Article
series South African Medical Journal
spelling doaj-art-8f8d732455cf4f319a0f2151b3d756e32025-02-10T12:25:58ZengSouth African Medical AssociationSouth African Medical Journal0256-95742078-51352024-06-011146b10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i16b.1007Prescribed Minimum Benefits complaints: a five-year retrospective review Lindelwa Mitchele Ngobeni0https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1187-7182Lucky Moropeng1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3789-5664Evelyn Thsehla2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4098-5804Schools of Health Systems and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of PretoriaSchools of Health Systems and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria2SAMRC/WITS Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science, Wits School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences Background: No matter which benefit option members have chosen, medical schemes are required by the Medical Schemes Act no. 131 of 1998 to pay costs associated with the diagnosis, treatment, or care of a specified set of benefits known as Prescribed Minimum Benefits (PMBs). Medical scheme beneficiaries have the right to lodge complaints with the Council for Medical Schemes (CMS) when their claims are denied. Objective: To determine and describe the pattern of PMBs complaints received by CMS from January 2014 to December 2018. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study that utilised the CMS’ clinical complaints. Data for PMBs, complainants, medical scheme types, and reasons for payment denial were extracted. The CMS’ lists of chronic conditions, PMBs, and registered schemes were used to confirm PMBs and to categorise schemes as either restricted (i.e., to only members of specific organisations) or open (i.e., to all South Africans). Extracted and coded data were analysed using SAS v.9.4 software. Results: A total of 2141 complaints were retrieved and 1124 PMBs complaints were included in the study. The median of PMBs complaints per year was 225. Most of the complaints (43.6%, n=490/1124) were lodged by members themselves. Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) constituted most of the PMBs conditions that members complained about. Medicine and surgery were the services that were mostly denied full payment by medical schemes. Open medical schemes accounted for more (73.8%, n=830/1124) of the complaints. Conclusion: Chronic conditions are the main diseases that medical scheme members complained about. Member education and clear definition of PMBs should be prioritised by medical schemes and the Council for Medical Schemes. https://samajournals.co.za/index.php/samj/article/view/1007Medical SchemesPrescribed Minimum BenefitsComplaints
spellingShingle Lindelwa Mitchele Ngobeni
Lucky Moropeng
Evelyn Thsehla
Prescribed Minimum Benefits complaints: a five-year retrospective review
South African Medical Journal
Medical Schemes
Prescribed Minimum Benefits
Complaints
title Prescribed Minimum Benefits complaints: a five-year retrospective review
title_full Prescribed Minimum Benefits complaints: a five-year retrospective review
title_fullStr Prescribed Minimum Benefits complaints: a five-year retrospective review
title_full_unstemmed Prescribed Minimum Benefits complaints: a five-year retrospective review
title_short Prescribed Minimum Benefits complaints: a five-year retrospective review
title_sort prescribed minimum benefits complaints a five year retrospective review
topic Medical Schemes
Prescribed Minimum Benefits
Complaints
url https://samajournals.co.za/index.php/samj/article/view/1007
work_keys_str_mv AT lindelwamitchelengobeni prescribedminimumbenefitscomplaintsafiveyearretrospectivereview
AT luckymoropeng prescribedminimumbenefitscomplaintsafiveyearretrospectivereview
AT evelynthsehla prescribedminimumbenefitscomplaintsafiveyearretrospectivereview