A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INDONESIAN AND PHILIPPINE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS: IDENTIFYING THE ROLE OF CUSTOMARY COURTS
Customary dispute resolution institutions in Indonesia and the Philippines serve to provide indigenous peoples with access to justice beyond state courts. This research, employing a normative juridical approach with a descriptive-analytical specification, highlights key differences between the two s...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitas Lampung
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | Cepalo |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/cepalo/article/view/3677 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850276770752757760 |
|---|---|
| author | Hazar Kusmayanti Sonny Dewi Judiasih Dede Kania Dewi Sulastri |
| author_facet | Hazar Kusmayanti Sonny Dewi Judiasih Dede Kania Dewi Sulastri |
| author_sort | Hazar Kusmayanti |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Customary dispute resolution institutions in Indonesia and the Philippines serve to provide indigenous peoples with access to justice beyond state courts. This research, employing a normative juridical approach with a descriptive-analytical specification, highlights key differences between the two systems. In Indonesia, customary courts derive recognition from the 1945 Constitution, while in the Philippines, they are explicitly regulated under the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act (IPRA) of 1997, leading to greater integration with the national legal system. Indonesian customary courts handle a broader range of disputes, whereas Philippine customary courts primarily focus on land rights and natural resource management. Additionally, Indonesian customary court decisions often face dualism in the application of customary and national law when reviewed by state courts, while Philippine customary court decisions are more systematically recognized and enforced within the formal legal framework. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8f7bb712dfc74afc8d6829fd204b0d4a |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2723-2581 2598-3105 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-03-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Lampung |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cepalo |
| spelling | doaj-art-8f7bb712dfc74afc8d6829fd204b0d4a2025-08-20T01:50:07ZengUniversitas LampungCepalo2723-25812598-31052025-03-0191132410.25041/cepalo.v9no1.36772407A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INDONESIAN AND PHILIPPINE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS: IDENTIFYING THE ROLE OF CUSTOMARY COURTSHazar Kusmayanti0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4236-0787Sonny Dewi Judiasih1Dede Kania2Dewi Sulastri3Universitas Padjadjaran Universitas PadjadjaranUIN SGD BandungUIN SGD BandungCustomary dispute resolution institutions in Indonesia and the Philippines serve to provide indigenous peoples with access to justice beyond state courts. This research, employing a normative juridical approach with a descriptive-analytical specification, highlights key differences between the two systems. In Indonesia, customary courts derive recognition from the 1945 Constitution, while in the Philippines, they are explicitly regulated under the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act (IPRA) of 1997, leading to greater integration with the national legal system. Indonesian customary courts handle a broader range of disputes, whereas Philippine customary courts primarily focus on land rights and natural resource management. Additionally, Indonesian customary court decisions often face dualism in the application of customary and national law when reviewed by state courts, while Philippine customary court decisions are more systematically recognized and enforced within the formal legal framework.https://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/cepalo/article/view/3677customaryindonesianphilippines |
| spellingShingle | Hazar Kusmayanti Sonny Dewi Judiasih Dede Kania Dewi Sulastri A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INDONESIAN AND PHILIPPINE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS: IDENTIFYING THE ROLE OF CUSTOMARY COURTS Cepalo customary indonesian philippines |
| title | A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INDONESIAN AND PHILIPPINE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS: IDENTIFYING THE ROLE OF CUSTOMARY COURTS |
| title_full | A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INDONESIAN AND PHILIPPINE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS: IDENTIFYING THE ROLE OF CUSTOMARY COURTS |
| title_fullStr | A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INDONESIAN AND PHILIPPINE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS: IDENTIFYING THE ROLE OF CUSTOMARY COURTS |
| title_full_unstemmed | A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INDONESIAN AND PHILIPPINE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS: IDENTIFYING THE ROLE OF CUSTOMARY COURTS |
| title_short | A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INDONESIAN AND PHILIPPINE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS: IDENTIFYING THE ROLE OF CUSTOMARY COURTS |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of the indonesian and philippine judicial systems identifying the role of customary courts |
| topic | customary indonesian philippines |
| url | https://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/cepalo/article/view/3677 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hazarkusmayanti acomparativeanalysisoftheindonesianandphilippinejudicialsystemsidentifyingtheroleofcustomarycourts AT sonnydewijudiasih acomparativeanalysisoftheindonesianandphilippinejudicialsystemsidentifyingtheroleofcustomarycourts AT dedekania acomparativeanalysisoftheindonesianandphilippinejudicialsystemsidentifyingtheroleofcustomarycourts AT dewisulastri acomparativeanalysisoftheindonesianandphilippinejudicialsystemsidentifyingtheroleofcustomarycourts AT hazarkusmayanti comparativeanalysisoftheindonesianandphilippinejudicialsystemsidentifyingtheroleofcustomarycourts AT sonnydewijudiasih comparativeanalysisoftheindonesianandphilippinejudicialsystemsidentifyingtheroleofcustomarycourts AT dedekania comparativeanalysisoftheindonesianandphilippinejudicialsystemsidentifyingtheroleofcustomarycourts AT dewisulastri comparativeanalysisoftheindonesianandphilippinejudicialsystemsidentifyingtheroleofcustomarycourts |