The United States Policy in Relation to Ethiopia, Democratic Republic Of The Congo, Sudan, South Sudan, Angola, and Libya
The political, economic and strategic significance of these six African countries have made them the object of intent attention and multivector activities by the United States of America. The article is focused on the events of 2019-2020. Despite an unprecedented internal political split and the cor...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute for African Studies
2020-09-01
|
| Series: | Ученые записки Института Африки Российской академии наук |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://africajournal.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Urnov-Politika.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850135206649921536 |
|---|---|
| author | URNOV Andrey Yurievich |
| author_facet | URNOV Andrey Yurievich |
| author_sort | URNOV Andrey Yurievich |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The political, economic and strategic significance of these six African countries have made them the object of intent attention and multivector activities by the United States of America. The article is focused on the events of 2019-2020. Despite an unprecedented internal political split and the coronavirus pandemic, the US African policy was sufficiently energetic, based on traditional “pillars” and conducted as part of the course for global hegemony.
The US tries to derive maximum benefits from the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where due to their interference there took place a change of presidents. The task is set to reinforce positions in Sudan and South Sudan. The provisional state power bodies are pressurized to implement the agreements on peaceful “transit to democracy”. The attempts are made to draw the new leaders of Ethiopia and Angola in the sphere of American influence. In Libya, while claiming to be “a neutral mediator”, the US intends to control the process of political settlement and to cajole the parties of the conflict into a compromise which will make the United States the dominant foreign partner of the country’s post conflict leadership. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8f6f04b1a45a4795b39b51c78e6d5bf2 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2412-5717 3034-3496 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-09-01 |
| publisher | Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute for African Studies |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ученые записки Института Африки Российской академии наук |
| spelling | doaj-art-8f6f04b1a45a4795b39b51c78e6d5bf22025-08-20T02:31:29ZengRussian Academy of Sciences, Institute for African StudiesУченые записки Института Африки Российской академии наук2412-57173034-34962020-09-01638711110.31132/2412-5717-2020-52-3-87-111The United States Policy in Relation to Ethiopia, Democratic Republic Of The Congo, Sudan, South Sudan, Angola, and LibyaURNOV Andrey Yurievich0Dr. Sc. (History), Principal Research Fellow, Institute for African Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences. Russian Federation, 123001, Moscow, Spiridonovka str. 30/1, e-mail: aurnov@yandex.ruThe political, economic and strategic significance of these six African countries have made them the object of intent attention and multivector activities by the United States of America. The article is focused on the events of 2019-2020. Despite an unprecedented internal political split and the coronavirus pandemic, the US African policy was sufficiently energetic, based on traditional “pillars” and conducted as part of the course for global hegemony. The US tries to derive maximum benefits from the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where due to their interference there took place a change of presidents. The task is set to reinforce positions in Sudan and South Sudan. The provisional state power bodies are pressurized to implement the agreements on peaceful “transit to democracy”. The attempts are made to draw the new leaders of Ethiopia and Angola in the sphere of American influence. In Libya, while claiming to be “a neutral mediator”, the US intends to control the process of political settlement and to cajole the parties of the conflict into a compromise which will make the United States the dominant foreign partner of the country’s post conflict leadership.https://africajournal.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Urnov-Politika.pdfus african policybilateral relationspartnersovereigntyconflictopposing partiesinterferencepolitical processdialoguesettlementde-escalationpeacekeeping |
| spellingShingle | URNOV Andrey Yurievich The United States Policy in Relation to Ethiopia, Democratic Republic Of The Congo, Sudan, South Sudan, Angola, and Libya Ученые записки Института Африки Российской академии наук us african policy bilateral relations partner sovereignty conflict opposing parties interference political process dialogue settlement de-escalation peacekeeping |
| title | The United States Policy in Relation to Ethiopia, Democratic Republic Of The Congo, Sudan, South Sudan, Angola, and Libya |
| title_full | The United States Policy in Relation to Ethiopia, Democratic Republic Of The Congo, Sudan, South Sudan, Angola, and Libya |
| title_fullStr | The United States Policy in Relation to Ethiopia, Democratic Republic Of The Congo, Sudan, South Sudan, Angola, and Libya |
| title_full_unstemmed | The United States Policy in Relation to Ethiopia, Democratic Republic Of The Congo, Sudan, South Sudan, Angola, and Libya |
| title_short | The United States Policy in Relation to Ethiopia, Democratic Republic Of The Congo, Sudan, South Sudan, Angola, and Libya |
| title_sort | united states policy in relation to ethiopia democratic republic of the congo sudan south sudan angola and libya |
| topic | us african policy bilateral relations partner sovereignty conflict opposing parties interference political process dialogue settlement de-escalation peacekeeping |
| url | https://africajournal.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Urnov-Politika.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT urnovandreyyurievich theunitedstatespolicyinrelationtoethiopiademocraticrepublicofthecongosudansouthsudanangolaandlibya AT urnovandreyyurievich unitedstatespolicyinrelationtoethiopiademocraticrepublicofthecongosudansouthsudanangolaandlibya |