Articaine Needle - Free Anesthesia Vs Conventional Anesthesia in Root Canal Treatment of Irreversible Pulpitis in Permanent Teeth: A Prospective Study on Anesthetic Efficacy and Effects on Pain

Suhui Qian,1,* Ziying Meng,2,* Haiyan Zhang,1 Kaicheng Li,1 Fei Zhang,1 Sen Zhang,1 Jianfei Liu,1 Zhou Zhou1 1Department of Stomatology, Huaibei People’s Hospital, Huaibei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China; 2Stomatology Department of Suixi County Hospital, Huaibei, Anhui, People’s R...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qian S, Meng Z, Zhang H, Li K, Zhang F, Zhang S, Liu J, Zhou Z
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2025-04-01
Series:Journal of Pain Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/articaine-needle---free-anesthesia-vs-conventional-anesthesia-in-root--peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JPR
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850040670655348736
author Qian S
Meng Z
Zhang H
Li K
Zhang F
Zhang S
Liu J
Zhou Z
author_facet Qian S
Meng Z
Zhang H
Li K
Zhang F
Zhang S
Liu J
Zhou Z
author_sort Qian S
collection DOAJ
description Suhui Qian,1,&ast; Ziying Meng,2,&ast; Haiyan Zhang,1 Kaicheng Li,1 Fei Zhang,1 Sen Zhang,1 Jianfei Liu,1 Zhou Zhou1 1Department of Stomatology, Huaibei People’s Hospital, Huaibei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China; 2Stomatology Department of Suixi County Hospital, Huaibei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Zhou Zhou, Email Zz178685@163.comObjective: This study aimed to compare the anesthetic efficacy of articaine needle-free anesthesia with conventional lidocaine nerve block anesthesia for root canal treatment in permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis.Methods: In this prospective clinical trial, 94 patients were randomly allocated to receive either articaine needle-free anesthesia (n=47) or lidocaine nerve block anesthesia (n=47). Anesthetic effectiveness was evaluated through onset time, success rate, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores during crown opening and pulp removal procedures. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic stability (heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) and incidence of adverse reactions.Results: The articaine group exhibited significantly faster anesthesia onset (7.62± 1.28 minutes vs 9.35± 2.04 minutes, p< 0.05) and higher success rate (93.62% vs 80.85%, p< 0.05). Patients receiving articaine reported significantly lower pain scores during crown opening (4.31± 1.13 vs 5.48± 1.06) and pulp removal (3.18± 1.07 vs 4.26± 1.12) (both p< 0.05). Both groups maintained comparable hemodynamic stability throughout the procedure (p> 0.05), with no significant difference in adverse reaction rates (11.49% vs 10.64%, p> 0.05).Conclusion: Articaine needle-free anesthesia demonstrates superior clinical performance compared to conventional lidocaine nerve block, offering faster onset, improved success rate, and enhanced pain control during root canal treatment of irreversible pulpitis, while maintaining equivalent safety parameters. These findings support its adoption as an effective alternative for dental anesthesia in endodontic procedures.Keywords: articaine needle-free anesthesia, conventional anesthesia, irreversible pulpitis, root canal treatment, effects, pain, impact
format Article
id doaj-art-8f3fdacf791041909489f92e6c0c4df0
institution DOAJ
issn 1178-7090
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Pain Research
spelling doaj-art-8f3fdacf791041909489f92e6c0c4df02025-08-20T02:56:01ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Pain Research1178-70902025-04-01Volume 1821152125102267Articaine Needle - Free Anesthesia Vs Conventional Anesthesia in Root Canal Treatment of Irreversible Pulpitis in Permanent Teeth: A Prospective Study on Anesthetic Efficacy and Effects on PainQian SMeng ZZhang HLi KZhang FZhang SLiu JZhou ZSuhui Qian,1,&ast; Ziying Meng,2,&ast; Haiyan Zhang,1 Kaicheng Li,1 Fei Zhang,1 Sen Zhang,1 Jianfei Liu,1 Zhou Zhou1 1Department of Stomatology, Huaibei People’s Hospital, Huaibei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China; 2Stomatology Department of Suixi County Hospital, Huaibei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Zhou Zhou, Email Zz178685@163.comObjective: This study aimed to compare the anesthetic efficacy of articaine needle-free anesthesia with conventional lidocaine nerve block anesthesia for root canal treatment in permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis.Methods: In this prospective clinical trial, 94 patients were randomly allocated to receive either articaine needle-free anesthesia (n=47) or lidocaine nerve block anesthesia (n=47). Anesthetic effectiveness was evaluated through onset time, success rate, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores during crown opening and pulp removal procedures. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic stability (heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) and incidence of adverse reactions.Results: The articaine group exhibited significantly faster anesthesia onset (7.62± 1.28 minutes vs 9.35± 2.04 minutes, p< 0.05) and higher success rate (93.62% vs 80.85%, p< 0.05). Patients receiving articaine reported significantly lower pain scores during crown opening (4.31± 1.13 vs 5.48± 1.06) and pulp removal (3.18± 1.07 vs 4.26± 1.12) (both p< 0.05). Both groups maintained comparable hemodynamic stability throughout the procedure (p> 0.05), with no significant difference in adverse reaction rates (11.49% vs 10.64%, p> 0.05).Conclusion: Articaine needle-free anesthesia demonstrates superior clinical performance compared to conventional lidocaine nerve block, offering faster onset, improved success rate, and enhanced pain control during root canal treatment of irreversible pulpitis, while maintaining equivalent safety parameters. These findings support its adoption as an effective alternative for dental anesthesia in endodontic procedures.Keywords: articaine needle-free anesthesia, conventional anesthesia, irreversible pulpitis, root canal treatment, effects, pain, impacthttps://www.dovepress.com/articaine-needle---free-anesthesia-vs-conventional-anesthesia-in-root--peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JPRarticaine needle-free anesthesiaconventional anesthesiairreversible pulpitisroot canal treatmenteffectspainimpact
spellingShingle Qian S
Meng Z
Zhang H
Li K
Zhang F
Zhang S
Liu J
Zhou Z
Articaine Needle - Free Anesthesia Vs Conventional Anesthesia in Root Canal Treatment of Irreversible Pulpitis in Permanent Teeth: A Prospective Study on Anesthetic Efficacy and Effects on Pain
Journal of Pain Research
articaine needle-free anesthesia
conventional anesthesia
irreversible pulpitis
root canal treatment
effects
pain
impact
title Articaine Needle - Free Anesthesia Vs Conventional Anesthesia in Root Canal Treatment of Irreversible Pulpitis in Permanent Teeth: A Prospective Study on Anesthetic Efficacy and Effects on Pain
title_full Articaine Needle - Free Anesthesia Vs Conventional Anesthesia in Root Canal Treatment of Irreversible Pulpitis in Permanent Teeth: A Prospective Study on Anesthetic Efficacy and Effects on Pain
title_fullStr Articaine Needle - Free Anesthesia Vs Conventional Anesthesia in Root Canal Treatment of Irreversible Pulpitis in Permanent Teeth: A Prospective Study on Anesthetic Efficacy and Effects on Pain
title_full_unstemmed Articaine Needle - Free Anesthesia Vs Conventional Anesthesia in Root Canal Treatment of Irreversible Pulpitis in Permanent Teeth: A Prospective Study on Anesthetic Efficacy and Effects on Pain
title_short Articaine Needle - Free Anesthesia Vs Conventional Anesthesia in Root Canal Treatment of Irreversible Pulpitis in Permanent Teeth: A Prospective Study on Anesthetic Efficacy and Effects on Pain
title_sort articaine needle free anesthesia vs conventional anesthesia in root canal treatment of irreversible pulpitis in permanent teeth a prospective study on anesthetic efficacy and effects on pain
topic articaine needle-free anesthesia
conventional anesthesia
irreversible pulpitis
root canal treatment
effects
pain
impact
url https://www.dovepress.com/articaine-needle---free-anesthesia-vs-conventional-anesthesia-in-root--peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JPR
work_keys_str_mv AT qians articaineneedlefreeanesthesiavsconventionalanesthesiainrootcanaltreatmentofirreversiblepulpitisinpermanentteethaprospectivestudyonanestheticefficacyandeffectsonpain
AT mengz articaineneedlefreeanesthesiavsconventionalanesthesiainrootcanaltreatmentofirreversiblepulpitisinpermanentteethaprospectivestudyonanestheticefficacyandeffectsonpain
AT zhangh articaineneedlefreeanesthesiavsconventionalanesthesiainrootcanaltreatmentofirreversiblepulpitisinpermanentteethaprospectivestudyonanestheticefficacyandeffectsonpain
AT lik articaineneedlefreeanesthesiavsconventionalanesthesiainrootcanaltreatmentofirreversiblepulpitisinpermanentteethaprospectivestudyonanestheticefficacyandeffectsonpain
AT zhangf articaineneedlefreeanesthesiavsconventionalanesthesiainrootcanaltreatmentofirreversiblepulpitisinpermanentteethaprospectivestudyonanestheticefficacyandeffectsonpain
AT zhangs articaineneedlefreeanesthesiavsconventionalanesthesiainrootcanaltreatmentofirreversiblepulpitisinpermanentteethaprospectivestudyonanestheticefficacyandeffectsonpain
AT liuj articaineneedlefreeanesthesiavsconventionalanesthesiainrootcanaltreatmentofirreversiblepulpitisinpermanentteethaprospectivestudyonanestheticefficacyandeffectsonpain
AT zhouz articaineneedlefreeanesthesiavsconventionalanesthesiainrootcanaltreatmentofirreversiblepulpitisinpermanentteethaprospectivestudyonanestheticefficacyandeffectsonpain