Current Communication Practices Between Internal Medicine Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants and Program Directors: A National Survey

Purpose: As fellowship applications increasingly transition to virtual interviews, the role of social media in this process remains uncertain. This study explores internal medicine subspecialty program directors' (PDs) perspectives on current communication practices, including the use of social...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rahul Kumar Thakur, Charan Thej Reddy Vegivinti, Barun Kumar Ray, Hasiya Yusuf, Abhishek Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-12-01
Series:American Journal of Medicine Open
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667036424000104
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850124267334664192
author Rahul Kumar Thakur
Charan Thej Reddy Vegivinti
Barun Kumar Ray
Hasiya Yusuf
Abhishek Kumar
author_facet Rahul Kumar Thakur
Charan Thej Reddy Vegivinti
Barun Kumar Ray
Hasiya Yusuf
Abhishek Kumar
author_sort Rahul Kumar Thakur
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: As fellowship applications increasingly transition to virtual interviews, the role of social media in this process remains uncertain. This study explores internal medicine subspecialty program directors' (PDs) perspectives on current communication practices, including the use of social media and email, between applicants and programs. Method: A national survey was conducted among U.S. internal medicine subspecialty fellowship PDs from November to December 2023. The survey collected demographic information about PDs, program-level information, and their views on using social media platforms (Twitter/X and Instagram) and email for program promotion and application review. Results: Out of 297 PDs who responded (18.5% response rate), 52% were male, 69% identified as White/Caucasian, majority from age group 46-50 years. The subspecialties with the highest representation were infectious disease (15%), pulmonology and critical care (14%), and cardiology (12%). Among respondents, 41% used Twitter/X and 24% used Instagram for program promotion. A smaller fraction reviewed applicants through these platforms for interview invitations (14% via Twitter/X and 7% via Instagram). PDs reported receiving an average of 35 letters of intent emails and calling 36% of applicants for interviews. Conclusions: This study is the first to assess the value PDs place on social media and email in the fellowship application review process across various internal medicine subspecialties. While social media is a valuable tool for program promotion and engagement, traditional email outreach remains crucial in the interview selection process.
format Article
id doaj-art-8f2ffa9d3a9d4133913fec3b730ccc85
institution OA Journals
issn 2667-0364
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series American Journal of Medicine Open
spelling doaj-art-8f2ffa9d3a9d4133913fec3b730ccc852025-08-20T02:34:20ZengElsevierAmerican Journal of Medicine Open2667-03642024-12-011210007310.1016/j.ajmo.2024.100073Current Communication Practices Between Internal Medicine Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants and Program Directors: A National SurveyRahul Kumar Thakur0Charan Thej Reddy Vegivinti1Barun Kumar Ray2Hasiya Yusuf3Abhishek Kumar4Department of Internal Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NYDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NYThe Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, Scranton, PADepartment of Internal Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NYDepartment of Hematology Oncology, Jacobi Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Requests for reprints should be addressed to Abhishek Kumar, Jacobi Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1400 Pelham Parkway S, Building 1, Room 3N20, Bronx, NY 10461Purpose: As fellowship applications increasingly transition to virtual interviews, the role of social media in this process remains uncertain. This study explores internal medicine subspecialty program directors' (PDs) perspectives on current communication practices, including the use of social media and email, between applicants and programs. Method: A national survey was conducted among U.S. internal medicine subspecialty fellowship PDs from November to December 2023. The survey collected demographic information about PDs, program-level information, and their views on using social media platforms (Twitter/X and Instagram) and email for program promotion and application review. Results: Out of 297 PDs who responded (18.5% response rate), 52% were male, 69% identified as White/Caucasian, majority from age group 46-50 years. The subspecialties with the highest representation were infectious disease (15%), pulmonology and critical care (14%), and cardiology (12%). Among respondents, 41% used Twitter/X and 24% used Instagram for program promotion. A smaller fraction reviewed applicants through these platforms for interview invitations (14% via Twitter/X and 7% via Instagram). PDs reported receiving an average of 35 letters of intent emails and calling 36% of applicants for interviews. Conclusions: This study is the first to assess the value PDs place on social media and email in the fellowship application review process across various internal medicine subspecialties. While social media is a valuable tool for program promotion and engagement, traditional email outreach remains crucial in the interview selection process.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667036424000104EmailFellowship applicationInterviewProgram directorSocial media
spellingShingle Rahul Kumar Thakur
Charan Thej Reddy Vegivinti
Barun Kumar Ray
Hasiya Yusuf
Abhishek Kumar
Current Communication Practices Between Internal Medicine Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants and Program Directors: A National Survey
American Journal of Medicine Open
Email
Fellowship application
Interview
Program director
Social media
title Current Communication Practices Between Internal Medicine Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants and Program Directors: A National Survey
title_full Current Communication Practices Between Internal Medicine Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants and Program Directors: A National Survey
title_fullStr Current Communication Practices Between Internal Medicine Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants and Program Directors: A National Survey
title_full_unstemmed Current Communication Practices Between Internal Medicine Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants and Program Directors: A National Survey
title_short Current Communication Practices Between Internal Medicine Subspecialty Fellowship Applicants and Program Directors: A National Survey
title_sort current communication practices between internal medicine subspecialty fellowship applicants and program directors a national survey
topic Email
Fellowship application
Interview
Program director
Social media
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667036424000104
work_keys_str_mv AT rahulkumarthakur currentcommunicationpracticesbetweeninternalmedicinesubspecialtyfellowshipapplicantsandprogramdirectorsanationalsurvey
AT charanthejreddyvegivinti currentcommunicationpracticesbetweeninternalmedicinesubspecialtyfellowshipapplicantsandprogramdirectorsanationalsurvey
AT barunkumarray currentcommunicationpracticesbetweeninternalmedicinesubspecialtyfellowshipapplicantsandprogramdirectorsanationalsurvey
AT hasiyayusuf currentcommunicationpracticesbetweeninternalmedicinesubspecialtyfellowshipapplicantsandprogramdirectorsanationalsurvey
AT abhishekkumar currentcommunicationpracticesbetweeninternalmedicinesubspecialtyfellowshipapplicantsandprogramdirectorsanationalsurvey