Standards-aligned annotations reveal organizational patterns in argumentative essays at scale
While scoring rubrics are widely used to evaluate student writing, they often fail to provide actionable feedback. Delivering such feedback—especially in an automated, scalable manner—requires the standardized detection of finer-grained information within a student’s essay. Achieving this level of d...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Amy Burkhardt, Suhwa Han, Sherri Woolf, Allison Boykin, Frank Rijmen, Susan Lottridge |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Education |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2025.1569529/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Rubric Design: A Designer’s Perspective
by: William Furman
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Rubric Design: A Designer’s Perspective
by: William Furman
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Rubric Design: A Designer’s Perspective
by: William Furman
Published: (2024-12-01) -
MaReS (Magdeburg Reflective Writing Scoring Rubric for Feedback) – development of a feedback method for reflective writing in health professions education: A pilot study in veterinary medicine
by: Ramspott, Sabine, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
The Effect of Writing Prompts on Developing Argumentative Essays of Iranian University Students of English
by: Alireza Jalilifar, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01)