Cognitive underpinnings and ecological correlates of implicit bias against non-Americans in the United States

Abstract Of the 330 million residents of the United States, over 40 million were born abroad. Such individuals are routinely referred to using labels such as “alien,” “foreigner,” and “noncitizen.” In this multimethod project relying on data from 5437 U.S. citizens in experimental studies and 193,64...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benedek Kurdi, Keitaro Okura, Eric Hehman, Melissa J. Ferguson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-04-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98384-3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850042848195379200
author Benedek Kurdi
Keitaro Okura
Eric Hehman
Melissa J. Ferguson
author_facet Benedek Kurdi
Keitaro Okura
Eric Hehman
Melissa J. Ferguson
author_sort Benedek Kurdi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Of the 330 million residents of the United States, over 40 million were born abroad. Such individuals are routinely referred to using labels such as “alien,” “foreigner,” and “noncitizen.” In this multimethod project relying on data from 5437 U.S. citizens in experimental studies and 193,649 U.S. citizens in archival studies, we examine implicit (automatic) evaluations of non-Americans in the United States, their effects on impression formation, and their ecological correlates in the form of real-life outcomes. In Studies 1A–1C, the labels “alien,” “foreigner,” and “noncitizen” were found to be highly and similarly implicitly negative. In Studies 2A–2D, applying these labels to specific individuals created immediate implicit negativity toward them, irrespective of their gender or race. Finally, pro-American/anti-foreigner implicit evaluations predicted anti-immigrant policy positions at the level of individuals (Study 3A), and a conceptually and statistically related implicit White–American/Asian–foreign implicit stereotype predicted anti-immigrant voting patterns in 18 relevant ballot initiatives at the level of U.S. counties (Study 3B). Across studies, implicit anti-foreigner bias generalized across participant demographics but was somewhat stronger among men and political conservatives. Together, this work highlights the cognitive underpinnings and real-world correlates of robust and pervasive anti-foreigner biases in the United States.
format Article
id doaj-art-8f008e3832f646da804cf47bf147e47e
institution DOAJ
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-8f008e3832f646da804cf47bf147e47e2025-08-20T02:55:25ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-04-0115112010.1038/s41598-025-98384-3Cognitive underpinnings and ecological correlates of implicit bias against non-Americans in the United StatesBenedek Kurdi0Keitaro Okura1Eric Hehman2Melissa J. Ferguson3Department of Psychology, Yale UniversityDepartment of Sociology, Yale UniversityDepartment of Psychology, McGill UniversityDepartment of Psychology, Yale UniversityAbstract Of the 330 million residents of the United States, over 40 million were born abroad. Such individuals are routinely referred to using labels such as “alien,” “foreigner,” and “noncitizen.” In this multimethod project relying on data from 5437 U.S. citizens in experimental studies and 193,649 U.S. citizens in archival studies, we examine implicit (automatic) evaluations of non-Americans in the United States, their effects on impression formation, and their ecological correlates in the form of real-life outcomes. In Studies 1A–1C, the labels “alien,” “foreigner,” and “noncitizen” were found to be highly and similarly implicitly negative. In Studies 2A–2D, applying these labels to specific individuals created immediate implicit negativity toward them, irrespective of their gender or race. Finally, pro-American/anti-foreigner implicit evaluations predicted anti-immigrant policy positions at the level of individuals (Study 3A), and a conceptually and statistically related implicit White–American/Asian–foreign implicit stereotype predicted anti-immigrant voting patterns in 18 relevant ballot initiatives at the level of U.S. counties (Study 3B). Across studies, implicit anti-foreigner bias generalized across participant demographics but was somewhat stronger among men and political conservatives. Together, this work highlights the cognitive underpinnings and real-world correlates of robust and pervasive anti-foreigner biases in the United States.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98384-3
spellingShingle Benedek Kurdi
Keitaro Okura
Eric Hehman
Melissa J. Ferguson
Cognitive underpinnings and ecological correlates of implicit bias against non-Americans in the United States
Scientific Reports
title Cognitive underpinnings and ecological correlates of implicit bias against non-Americans in the United States
title_full Cognitive underpinnings and ecological correlates of implicit bias against non-Americans in the United States
title_fullStr Cognitive underpinnings and ecological correlates of implicit bias against non-Americans in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive underpinnings and ecological correlates of implicit bias against non-Americans in the United States
title_short Cognitive underpinnings and ecological correlates of implicit bias against non-Americans in the United States
title_sort cognitive underpinnings and ecological correlates of implicit bias against non americans in the united states
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98384-3
work_keys_str_mv AT benedekkurdi cognitiveunderpinningsandecologicalcorrelatesofimplicitbiasagainstnonamericansintheunitedstates
AT keitarookura cognitiveunderpinningsandecologicalcorrelatesofimplicitbiasagainstnonamericansintheunitedstates
AT erichehman cognitiveunderpinningsandecologicalcorrelatesofimplicitbiasagainstnonamericansintheunitedstates
AT melissajferguson cognitiveunderpinningsandecologicalcorrelatesofimplicitbiasagainstnonamericansintheunitedstates