An indirect ELISA for the detection of antibodies against Dirofilaria spp. in cats

Abstract Background Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens are mosquito-borne filaroids that primarily infect dogs but also cats. Diagnosing feline dirofilariosis is challenging because of the low parasitic burdens and transient or absent microfilaremia. To improve detection of antibodies against Dirofil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lívia Perles, Mariaelisa Carbonara, Jairo Alfonso Mendoza-Roldan, Luigi Venco, Simona Gabrielli, Domenico Otranto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:Parasites & Vectors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06657-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832586003327483904
author Lívia Perles
Mariaelisa Carbonara
Jairo Alfonso Mendoza-Roldan
Luigi Venco
Simona Gabrielli
Domenico Otranto
author_facet Lívia Perles
Mariaelisa Carbonara
Jairo Alfonso Mendoza-Roldan
Luigi Venco
Simona Gabrielli
Domenico Otranto
author_sort Lívia Perles
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens are mosquito-borne filaroids that primarily infect dogs but also cats. Diagnosing feline dirofilariosis is challenging because of the low parasitic burdens and transient or absent microfilaremia. To improve detection of antibodies against Dirofilaria spp. in cats, an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using somatic antigens of D. immitis was standardized. Methods Serum samples from cats positive for D. immitis, D. repens, bronchopulmonary metastrongylids and gastrointestinal helminths as well as negative sera were tested to evaluate the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp). Three different antigen concentrations (2, 3 and 4 μg/ml) and two concentrations of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) IgG anti-cat conjugate (1:10,000 and 1:20,000) were used to screen the optimal titration of the test. Once the best conditions were established, Se and Sp were assessed by testing 151 serum samples positive for D. immitis, D. repens and other parasites (i.e. feline lungworms, gastrointestinal helminths) or negative. Results The optimized ELISA showed 89% Se and 98% Sp in detecting D. immitis infections, presenting a cross-reactivity with D. repens. A cut-off point of 1.150 was established to classify positive and negative samples. Conclusions The developed ELISA may improve the detection of antibodies against Dirofilaria spp. in cats, also in epidemiological contexts characterized by multiple helminth infections. Future efforts will focus on reducing the cross-reactivity with D. repens, therefore increasing ELISA Sp. Graphical Abstract
format Article
id doaj-art-8eed72b7cb5f45959da99b80c1dfe8fe
institution Kabale University
issn 1756-3305
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Parasites & Vectors
spelling doaj-art-8eed72b7cb5f45959da99b80c1dfe8fe2025-01-26T12:17:39ZengBMCParasites & Vectors1756-33052025-01-011811510.1186/s13071-024-06657-zAn indirect ELISA for the detection of antibodies against Dirofilaria spp. in catsLívia Perles0Mariaelisa Carbonara1Jairo Alfonso Mendoza-Roldan2Luigi Venco3Simona Gabrielli4Domenico Otranto5Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of BariDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of BariDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of BariOspedale Veterinario Città Di PaviaDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases “Sapienza”, University of RomeDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of BariAbstract Background Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens are mosquito-borne filaroids that primarily infect dogs but also cats. Diagnosing feline dirofilariosis is challenging because of the low parasitic burdens and transient or absent microfilaremia. To improve detection of antibodies against Dirofilaria spp. in cats, an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using somatic antigens of D. immitis was standardized. Methods Serum samples from cats positive for D. immitis, D. repens, bronchopulmonary metastrongylids and gastrointestinal helminths as well as negative sera were tested to evaluate the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp). Three different antigen concentrations (2, 3 and 4 μg/ml) and two concentrations of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) IgG anti-cat conjugate (1:10,000 and 1:20,000) were used to screen the optimal titration of the test. Once the best conditions were established, Se and Sp were assessed by testing 151 serum samples positive for D. immitis, D. repens and other parasites (i.e. feline lungworms, gastrointestinal helminths) or negative. Results The optimized ELISA showed 89% Se and 98% Sp in detecting D. immitis infections, presenting a cross-reactivity with D. repens. A cut-off point of 1.150 was established to classify positive and negative samples. Conclusions The developed ELISA may improve the detection of antibodies against Dirofilaria spp. in cats, also in epidemiological contexts characterized by multiple helminth infections. Future efforts will focus on reducing the cross-reactivity with D. repens, therefore increasing ELISA Sp. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06657-zDirofilaria immitisDirofilaria repensSerologySomatic antigensFeline dirofilariosis
spellingShingle Lívia Perles
Mariaelisa Carbonara
Jairo Alfonso Mendoza-Roldan
Luigi Venco
Simona Gabrielli
Domenico Otranto
An indirect ELISA for the detection of antibodies against Dirofilaria spp. in cats
Parasites & Vectors
Dirofilaria immitis
Dirofilaria repens
Serology
Somatic antigens
Feline dirofilariosis
title An indirect ELISA for the detection of antibodies against Dirofilaria spp. in cats
title_full An indirect ELISA for the detection of antibodies against Dirofilaria spp. in cats
title_fullStr An indirect ELISA for the detection of antibodies against Dirofilaria spp. in cats
title_full_unstemmed An indirect ELISA for the detection of antibodies against Dirofilaria spp. in cats
title_short An indirect ELISA for the detection of antibodies against Dirofilaria spp. in cats
title_sort indirect elisa for the detection of antibodies against dirofilaria spp in cats
topic Dirofilaria immitis
Dirofilaria repens
Serology
Somatic antigens
Feline dirofilariosis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06657-z
work_keys_str_mv AT liviaperles anindirectelisaforthedetectionofantibodiesagainstdirofilariasppincats
AT mariaelisacarbonara anindirectelisaforthedetectionofantibodiesagainstdirofilariasppincats
AT jairoalfonsomendozaroldan anindirectelisaforthedetectionofantibodiesagainstdirofilariasppincats
AT luigivenco anindirectelisaforthedetectionofantibodiesagainstdirofilariasppincats
AT simonagabrielli anindirectelisaforthedetectionofantibodiesagainstdirofilariasppincats
AT domenicootranto anindirectelisaforthedetectionofantibodiesagainstdirofilariasppincats
AT liviaperles indirectelisaforthedetectionofantibodiesagainstdirofilariasppincats
AT mariaelisacarbonara indirectelisaforthedetectionofantibodiesagainstdirofilariasppincats
AT jairoalfonsomendozaroldan indirectelisaforthedetectionofantibodiesagainstdirofilariasppincats
AT luigivenco indirectelisaforthedetectionofantibodiesagainstdirofilariasppincats
AT simonagabrielli indirectelisaforthedetectionofantibodiesagainstdirofilariasppincats
AT domenicootranto indirectelisaforthedetectionofantibodiesagainstdirofilariasppincats