Prevalence and predictors of Implanon uptake in Ugu (Ugu North Sub District) 2016/17

Background: The contraceptive implant (Implanon) has been recognised as one of the most effective family planning methods and is a healthier choice for women in Africa due to its efficacy and convenience. Despite the evidence of effectiveness and safety of the implant, the actual uptake for Implanon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anudha Moodley, Ozayr Mahomed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2019-04-01
Series:South African Family Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://safpj.co.za/index.php/safpj/article/view/5006
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849737524845477888
author Anudha Moodley
Ozayr Mahomed
author_facet Anudha Moodley
Ozayr Mahomed
author_sort Anudha Moodley
collection DOAJ
description Background: The contraceptive implant (Implanon) has been recognised as one of the most effective family planning methods and is a healthier choice for women in Africa due to its efficacy and convenience. Despite the evidence of effectiveness and safety of the implant, the actual uptake for Implanon use in the Ugu district of KwaZulu-Natal is relatively low. The aim of the study was to determine factors associated with Implanon uptake in Ugu North Sub District 2016/17. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study with an analytical component using self-administered questionnaires to collect information from 385 participants using randomised systematic sampling was conducted at family planning clinics at GJ Crookes Hospital and seven surrounding primary health care clinics. The chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression was used to determine associations. Results: Some 16% (n = 60) of the participants utilised Implanon. Despite having the correct knowledge 65.7% (n = 220) were not willing to use Implanon if it were offered. In addition, 55% of participants (n = 177) believed Implanon had more side effects. Parity ( 4 children) was found to be a statistically significant protective factor against (p 0.05) Implanon uptake. Conclusion: Implanon is a highly unattractive method of contraception for women residing in the Ugu North Sub District. Fear of side effects and invasive method of insertion were identified as the major barriers to Implanon use. Education and increased patient awareness are strategies to increase the desirability and uptake of Implanon.
format Article
id doaj-art-8e9c5111ecb64cfda0c87c324caedd12
institution DOAJ
issn 2078-6190
2078-6204
language English
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series South African Family Practice
spelling doaj-art-8e9c5111ecb64cfda0c87c324caedd122025-08-20T03:06:53ZengAOSISSouth African Family Practice2078-61902078-62042019-04-0161210.4102/safp.v61i2.50063982Prevalence and predictors of Implanon uptake in Ugu (Ugu North Sub District) 2016/17Anudha Moodley0Ozayr Mahomed1University of KwaZulu-NatalUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalBackground: The contraceptive implant (Implanon) has been recognised as one of the most effective family planning methods and is a healthier choice for women in Africa due to its efficacy and convenience. Despite the evidence of effectiveness and safety of the implant, the actual uptake for Implanon use in the Ugu district of KwaZulu-Natal is relatively low. The aim of the study was to determine factors associated with Implanon uptake in Ugu North Sub District 2016/17. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study with an analytical component using self-administered questionnaires to collect information from 385 participants using randomised systematic sampling was conducted at family planning clinics at GJ Crookes Hospital and seven surrounding primary health care clinics. The chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression was used to determine associations. Results: Some 16% (n = 60) of the participants utilised Implanon. Despite having the correct knowledge 65.7% (n = 220) were not willing to use Implanon if it were offered. In addition, 55% of participants (n = 177) believed Implanon had more side effects. Parity ( 4 children) was found to be a statistically significant protective factor against (p 0.05) Implanon uptake. Conclusion: Implanon is a highly unattractive method of contraception for women residing in the Ugu North Sub District. Fear of side effects and invasive method of insertion were identified as the major barriers to Implanon use. Education and increased patient awareness are strategies to increase the desirability and uptake of Implanon.https://safpj.co.za/index.php/safpj/article/view/5006contraceptionsexual healthparityimplanon uptakeprimary healthcare
spellingShingle Anudha Moodley
Ozayr Mahomed
Prevalence and predictors of Implanon uptake in Ugu (Ugu North Sub District) 2016/17
South African Family Practice
contraception
sexual health
parity
implanon uptake
primary healthcare
title Prevalence and predictors of Implanon uptake in Ugu (Ugu North Sub District) 2016/17
title_full Prevalence and predictors of Implanon uptake in Ugu (Ugu North Sub District) 2016/17
title_fullStr Prevalence and predictors of Implanon uptake in Ugu (Ugu North Sub District) 2016/17
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and predictors of Implanon uptake in Ugu (Ugu North Sub District) 2016/17
title_short Prevalence and predictors of Implanon uptake in Ugu (Ugu North Sub District) 2016/17
title_sort prevalence and predictors of implanon uptake in ugu ugu north sub district 2016 17
topic contraception
sexual health
parity
implanon uptake
primary healthcare
url https://safpj.co.za/index.php/safpj/article/view/5006
work_keys_str_mv AT anudhamoodley prevalenceandpredictorsofimplanonuptakeinuguugunorthsubdistrict201617
AT ozayrmahomed prevalenceandpredictorsofimplanonuptakeinuguugunorthsubdistrict201617