Patient experiences and discomfort associated with mid-palatal temporary skeletal anchorage devices

Abstract Background Mid-palatal placement of temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs) has become increasingly popular among clinicians due to high success rates, low associated risk and streamlining and enhanced customization of associated supra-structures. There is however limited patient data...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aoife P. Barry, Vanessa Knode, Padhraig S. Fleming, Björn Ludwig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-02-01
Series:Progress in Orthodontics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-024-00549-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861575646183424
author Aoife P. Barry
Vanessa Knode
Padhraig S. Fleming
Björn Ludwig
author_facet Aoife P. Barry
Vanessa Knode
Padhraig S. Fleming
Björn Ludwig
author_sort Aoife P. Barry
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Mid-palatal placement of temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs) has become increasingly popular among clinicians due to high success rates, low associated risk and streamlining and enhanced customization of associated supra-structures. There is however limited patient data in relation to associated experiences and impacts. Methods A survey of patients undergoing mid-palatal TSAD insertion was undertaken using a 27-item bespoke questionnaire. Questionnaires were sent using both electronic and surface mail with a 3-month period allowed for response. Pain experience; the use of analgesia; requirement for additional visits; impacts on hygiene, speech, eating, and hobbies; and social impacts were assessed. Reponses involved the use of a Visual Analogue Scale as well as binary information. Results Overall, 152 responses were obtained with 87.5% describing experience of TSAD insertion either “as expected” or “better”. Procedural pain was reported as mild in 62.5%. Local post-operative pain was scored as moderate in 21.1%. Some functional impairment was reported with 63.2% attributing difficulty with speech and 67.8% difficulty with eating due to the implant. However, these functional impairments were generally considered mild (by 68.1% and 60.2%, respectively) and most were very likely to recommend this treatment to others, with 65.1% (n = 99) scoring 8 or above out of 10. Conclusions Appreciable levels of pain, discomfort and functional impairment were noted with the use of mid-palatal TSADs. However, any unpleasant experiences were generally regarded as mild with most highly likely to recommend mid-palatal TSADs to prospective patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-8e9734779e8b414887796d1f2c9c91e7
institution Kabale University
issn 2196-1042
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Progress in Orthodontics
spelling doaj-art-8e9734779e8b414887796d1f2c9c91e72025-02-09T12:56:38ZengSpringerOpenProgress in Orthodontics2196-10422025-02-0126111110.1186/s40510-024-00549-9Patient experiences and discomfort associated with mid-palatal temporary skeletal anchorage devicesAoife P. Barry0Vanessa Knode1Padhraig S. Fleming2Björn Ludwig3School of Dental Science, Dublin Dental University Hospital, University of Dublin, Trinity College DublinUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University MainzSchool of Dental Science, Dublin Dental University Hospital, University of Dublin, Trinity College DublinDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Homburg/SaarAbstract Background Mid-palatal placement of temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs) has become increasingly popular among clinicians due to high success rates, low associated risk and streamlining and enhanced customization of associated supra-structures. There is however limited patient data in relation to associated experiences and impacts. Methods A survey of patients undergoing mid-palatal TSAD insertion was undertaken using a 27-item bespoke questionnaire. Questionnaires were sent using both electronic and surface mail with a 3-month period allowed for response. Pain experience; the use of analgesia; requirement for additional visits; impacts on hygiene, speech, eating, and hobbies; and social impacts were assessed. Reponses involved the use of a Visual Analogue Scale as well as binary information. Results Overall, 152 responses were obtained with 87.5% describing experience of TSAD insertion either “as expected” or “better”. Procedural pain was reported as mild in 62.5%. Local post-operative pain was scored as moderate in 21.1%. Some functional impairment was reported with 63.2% attributing difficulty with speech and 67.8% difficulty with eating due to the implant. However, these functional impairments were generally considered mild (by 68.1% and 60.2%, respectively) and most were very likely to recommend this treatment to others, with 65.1% (n = 99) scoring 8 or above out of 10. Conclusions Appreciable levels of pain, discomfort and functional impairment were noted with the use of mid-palatal TSADs. However, any unpleasant experiences were generally regarded as mild with most highly likely to recommend mid-palatal TSADs to prospective patients.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-024-00549-9Patient experiencePatient reported outcomesMid-palatalAnchorageTSAD (Temporary skeletal anchorage device)MI (Mini-implant)
spellingShingle Aoife P. Barry
Vanessa Knode
Padhraig S. Fleming
Björn Ludwig
Patient experiences and discomfort associated with mid-palatal temporary skeletal anchorage devices
Progress in Orthodontics
Patient experience
Patient reported outcomes
Mid-palatal
Anchorage
TSAD (Temporary skeletal anchorage device)
MI (Mini-implant)
title Patient experiences and discomfort associated with mid-palatal temporary skeletal anchorage devices
title_full Patient experiences and discomfort associated with mid-palatal temporary skeletal anchorage devices
title_fullStr Patient experiences and discomfort associated with mid-palatal temporary skeletal anchorage devices
title_full_unstemmed Patient experiences and discomfort associated with mid-palatal temporary skeletal anchorage devices
title_short Patient experiences and discomfort associated with mid-palatal temporary skeletal anchorage devices
title_sort patient experiences and discomfort associated with mid palatal temporary skeletal anchorage devices
topic Patient experience
Patient reported outcomes
Mid-palatal
Anchorage
TSAD (Temporary skeletal anchorage device)
MI (Mini-implant)
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-024-00549-9
work_keys_str_mv AT aoifepbarry patientexperiencesanddiscomfortassociatedwithmidpalataltemporaryskeletalanchoragedevices
AT vanessaknode patientexperiencesanddiscomfortassociatedwithmidpalataltemporaryskeletalanchoragedevices
AT padhraigsfleming patientexperiencesanddiscomfortassociatedwithmidpalataltemporaryskeletalanchoragedevices
AT bjornludwig patientexperiencesanddiscomfortassociatedwithmidpalataltemporaryskeletalanchoragedevices