Number of intraepithelial lymphocytes and presence of a subepithelial band in normal colonic mucosa differs according to stainings and evaluation method

Chronic watery diarrhea is a frequent symptom. In approximately 10% of the patients, a diagnosis of microscopic colitis (MC) is established. The diagnosis relies on specific, but sometimes subtle, histopathological findings. As the histology of normal intestinal mucosa vary, discriminating subtle fe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne-Marie Kanstrup Fiehn, Peter Johan Heiberg Engel, Ulla Engel, Dea Natalie Munch Jepsen, Thomas Blixt, Julie Rasmussen, Signe Wildt, Wojciech Cebula, Andreea-Raluca Diac, Lars Kristian Munck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Pathology Informatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353924000130
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850109364670562304
author Anne-Marie Kanstrup Fiehn
Peter Johan Heiberg Engel
Ulla Engel
Dea Natalie Munch Jepsen
Thomas Blixt
Julie Rasmussen
Signe Wildt
Wojciech Cebula
Andreea-Raluca Diac
Lars Kristian Munck
author_facet Anne-Marie Kanstrup Fiehn
Peter Johan Heiberg Engel
Ulla Engel
Dea Natalie Munch Jepsen
Thomas Blixt
Julie Rasmussen
Signe Wildt
Wojciech Cebula
Andreea-Raluca Diac
Lars Kristian Munck
author_sort Anne-Marie Kanstrup Fiehn
collection DOAJ
description Chronic watery diarrhea is a frequent symptom. In approximately 10% of the patients, a diagnosis of microscopic colitis (MC) is established. The diagnosis relies on specific, but sometimes subtle, histopathological findings. As the histology of normal intestinal mucosa vary, discriminating subtle features of MC from normal tissue can be challenging and therefore auxiliary stainings are increasingly used. The aim of this study was to determine the variance in number of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) and presence of a subepithelial band in normal ileum and colonic mucosa, according to different stains and digital assessment. Sixty-one patients without diarrhea referred to screening colonoscopy due to a positive feacal blood test and presenting with endoscopically normal mucosa were included. Basic histological features, number of IELs, and thickness of a subepithelial band was manually evaluated and a deep learning-based algorithm was developed to digitally determine the number of IELs in each of the two compartments; surface epithelium and cryptal epithelium, and the density of lymphocytes in the lamina propria compartment. The number of IELs was significantly higher on CD3-stained slides compared with slides stained with Hematoxylin-and-Eosin (HE) (p<0.001), and even higher numbers were reached using digital analysis. No significant difference between right and left colon in IELs or density of CD3-positive lymphocytes in lamina propria was found. No subepithelial band was present in HE-stained slides while a thin band was visualized on special stains. Conclusively, in this cohort of prospectively collected ileum and colonic biopsies from asymptomatic patients, the range of IELs and detection of a subepithelial collagenous band varied depending on the stain and method used for assessment. As assessment of biopsies from patients with diarrhea constitute a considerable workload in the pathology departments digital image analysis is highly desired. Knowledge provided by the present study highlight important differences that should be considered before introducing this method in the clinic.
format Article
id doaj-art-8e783877457345e58927c84ae548a4fd
institution OA Journals
issn 2153-3539
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Pathology Informatics
spelling doaj-art-8e783877457345e58927c84ae548a4fd2025-08-20T02:38:05ZengElsevierJournal of Pathology Informatics2153-35392024-12-011510037410.1016/j.jpi.2024.100374Number of intraepithelial lymphocytes and presence of a subepithelial band in normal colonic mucosa differs according to stainings and evaluation methodAnne-Marie Kanstrup Fiehn0Peter Johan Heiberg Engel1Ulla Engel2Dea Natalie Munch Jepsen3Thomas Blixt4Julie Rasmussen5Signe Wildt6Wojciech Cebula7Andreea-Raluca Diac8Lars Kristian Munck9Department of Pathology, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Sygehusvej 9, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark; Corresponding author at: Department of Pathology and Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Sygehusvej 9, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.Department of Pathology, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Sygehusvej 9, 4000 Roskilde, DenmarkDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Allé 30, 2650 Hvidovre, DenmarkDepartment of Pathology, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Sygehusvej 9, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark; Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600 Køge, DenmarkDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600 Køge, DenmarkDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600 Køge, DenmarkGastroUnit, Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Allé 30, 2650 Hvidovre, DenmarkDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, Zealand University Hospital Nykøbing Falster, Fjordvej 15, 4800 Nykøbing Falster, DenmarkDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, Zealand University Hospital Nykøbing Falster, Fjordvej 15, 4800 Nykøbing Falster, DenmarkDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600 Køge, DenmarkChronic watery diarrhea is a frequent symptom. In approximately 10% of the patients, a diagnosis of microscopic colitis (MC) is established. The diagnosis relies on specific, but sometimes subtle, histopathological findings. As the histology of normal intestinal mucosa vary, discriminating subtle features of MC from normal tissue can be challenging and therefore auxiliary stainings are increasingly used. The aim of this study was to determine the variance in number of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) and presence of a subepithelial band in normal ileum and colonic mucosa, according to different stains and digital assessment. Sixty-one patients without diarrhea referred to screening colonoscopy due to a positive feacal blood test and presenting with endoscopically normal mucosa were included. Basic histological features, number of IELs, and thickness of a subepithelial band was manually evaluated and a deep learning-based algorithm was developed to digitally determine the number of IELs in each of the two compartments; surface epithelium and cryptal epithelium, and the density of lymphocytes in the lamina propria compartment. The number of IELs was significantly higher on CD3-stained slides compared with slides stained with Hematoxylin-and-Eosin (HE) (p<0.001), and even higher numbers were reached using digital analysis. No significant difference between right and left colon in IELs or density of CD3-positive lymphocytes in lamina propria was found. No subepithelial band was present in HE-stained slides while a thin band was visualized on special stains. Conclusively, in this cohort of prospectively collected ileum and colonic biopsies from asymptomatic patients, the range of IELs and detection of a subepithelial collagenous band varied depending on the stain and method used for assessment. As assessment of biopsies from patients with diarrhea constitute a considerable workload in the pathology departments digital image analysis is highly desired. Knowledge provided by the present study highlight important differences that should be considered before introducing this method in the clinic.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353924000130Normal histologyHistopathologyIntestinal mucosaMicroscopic colitisImmunohistochemical stainingDigital pathology
spellingShingle Anne-Marie Kanstrup Fiehn
Peter Johan Heiberg Engel
Ulla Engel
Dea Natalie Munch Jepsen
Thomas Blixt
Julie Rasmussen
Signe Wildt
Wojciech Cebula
Andreea-Raluca Diac
Lars Kristian Munck
Number of intraepithelial lymphocytes and presence of a subepithelial band in normal colonic mucosa differs according to stainings and evaluation method
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Normal histology
Histopathology
Intestinal mucosa
Microscopic colitis
Immunohistochemical staining
Digital pathology
title Number of intraepithelial lymphocytes and presence of a subepithelial band in normal colonic mucosa differs according to stainings and evaluation method
title_full Number of intraepithelial lymphocytes and presence of a subepithelial band in normal colonic mucosa differs according to stainings and evaluation method
title_fullStr Number of intraepithelial lymphocytes and presence of a subepithelial band in normal colonic mucosa differs according to stainings and evaluation method
title_full_unstemmed Number of intraepithelial lymphocytes and presence of a subepithelial band in normal colonic mucosa differs according to stainings and evaluation method
title_short Number of intraepithelial lymphocytes and presence of a subepithelial band in normal colonic mucosa differs according to stainings and evaluation method
title_sort number of intraepithelial lymphocytes and presence of a subepithelial band in normal colonic mucosa differs according to stainings and evaluation method
topic Normal histology
Histopathology
Intestinal mucosa
Microscopic colitis
Immunohistochemical staining
Digital pathology
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353924000130
work_keys_str_mv AT annemariekanstrupfiehn numberofintraepitheliallymphocytesandpresenceofasubepithelialbandinnormalcolonicmucosadiffersaccordingtostainingsandevaluationmethod
AT peterjohanheibergengel numberofintraepitheliallymphocytesandpresenceofasubepithelialbandinnormalcolonicmucosadiffersaccordingtostainingsandevaluationmethod
AT ullaengel numberofintraepitheliallymphocytesandpresenceofasubepithelialbandinnormalcolonicmucosadiffersaccordingtostainingsandevaluationmethod
AT deanataliemunchjepsen numberofintraepitheliallymphocytesandpresenceofasubepithelialbandinnormalcolonicmucosadiffersaccordingtostainingsandevaluationmethod
AT thomasblixt numberofintraepitheliallymphocytesandpresenceofasubepithelialbandinnormalcolonicmucosadiffersaccordingtostainingsandevaluationmethod
AT julierasmussen numberofintraepitheliallymphocytesandpresenceofasubepithelialbandinnormalcolonicmucosadiffersaccordingtostainingsandevaluationmethod
AT signewildt numberofintraepitheliallymphocytesandpresenceofasubepithelialbandinnormalcolonicmucosadiffersaccordingtostainingsandevaluationmethod
AT wojciechcebula numberofintraepitheliallymphocytesandpresenceofasubepithelialbandinnormalcolonicmucosadiffersaccordingtostainingsandevaluationmethod
AT andreearalucadiac numberofintraepitheliallymphocytesandpresenceofasubepithelialbandinnormalcolonicmucosadiffersaccordingtostainingsandevaluationmethod
AT larskristianmunck numberofintraepitheliallymphocytesandpresenceofasubepithelialbandinnormalcolonicmucosadiffersaccordingtostainingsandevaluationmethod