Effect of different pretreatment methods on the quality of fermented mustard

In order to optimize the production process of fermented mustard, the effects of different pretreatment methods of fresh mustard on physicochemical indexes, color parameters, texture, volatile flavor components, and sensory quality of fermented mustard were investigated. Principal component analysis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: ZHENG Qilin, DENG Fangming, ZHAO Lingyan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Editorial Department of China Brewing 2025-03-01
Series:Zhongguo niangzao
Subjects:
Online Access:https://manu61.magtech.com.cn/zgnz/fileup/0254-5071/PDF/0254-5071-2025-44-3-156.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850040571600568320
author ZHENG Qilin, DENG Fangming, ZHAO Lingyan
author_facet ZHENG Qilin, DENG Fangming, ZHAO Lingyan
author_sort ZHENG Qilin, DENG Fangming, ZHAO Lingyan
collection DOAJ
description In order to optimize the production process of fermented mustard, the effects of different pretreatment methods of fresh mustard on physicochemical indexes, color parameters, texture, volatile flavor components, and sensory quality of fermented mustard were investigated. Principal component analysis (PCA), orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) and cluster analysis (CA) were performed based on texture, volatile flavor components, and differential volatile flavor components were screened using variable importance in the projection (VIP) values. The results showed that the optimal pre-treatment method for fresh mustard: soaked it in 4% saline for 2 h, then dried the surface moisture naturally (dried 8 h, moisture 83.3%). The total acid and amino acid nitrogen contents of the naturally fermented mustard product were 19.98 g/kg and 0.28 g/100 g, and the L* value, a* value, b* value, and color difference value were 36.07, -0.27, 4.70, 4.21, respectively. The comprehensive texture score was 1.71 points, and the sensory score was 92 points. The nitrite content was 0.014 3 mg/kg, which was much lower than the national limit standard (20 mg/kg). A total of 74 volatile flavor components in fermented mustard samples with different pretreatments were detected, including 15 alcohols, 1 phenol, 2 ketones, 12 aldehydes, 3 nitriles, 7 esters, 4 isothiocyanates, 29 hydrocarbons, and 1 other type. OPLS-DA could effectively distinguish fermented mustard samples with different pretreatments, and a total of 45 differentially volatile flavor components (VIP values>1) were screened.
format Article
id doaj-art-8e514a1a557449c99fef31ed7bc5ef4b
institution DOAJ
issn 0254-5071
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Editorial Department of China Brewing
record_format Article
series Zhongguo niangzao
spelling doaj-art-8e514a1a557449c99fef31ed7bc5ef4b2025-08-20T02:56:02ZengEditorial Department of China BrewingZhongguo niangzao0254-50712025-03-0144315616410.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2025.03.024Effect of different pretreatment methods on the quality of fermented mustardZHENG Qilin, DENG Fangming, ZHAO Lingyan0College of Food Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, HunanIn order to optimize the production process of fermented mustard, the effects of different pretreatment methods of fresh mustard on physicochemical indexes, color parameters, texture, volatile flavor components, and sensory quality of fermented mustard were investigated. Principal component analysis (PCA), orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) and cluster analysis (CA) were performed based on texture, volatile flavor components, and differential volatile flavor components were screened using variable importance in the projection (VIP) values. The results showed that the optimal pre-treatment method for fresh mustard: soaked it in 4% saline for 2 h, then dried the surface moisture naturally (dried 8 h, moisture 83.3%). The total acid and amino acid nitrogen contents of the naturally fermented mustard product were 19.98 g/kg and 0.28 g/100 g, and the L* value, a* value, b* value, and color difference value were 36.07, -0.27, 4.70, 4.21, respectively. The comprehensive texture score was 1.71 points, and the sensory score was 92 points. The nitrite content was 0.014 3 mg/kg, which was much lower than the national limit standard (20 mg/kg). A total of 74 volatile flavor components in fermented mustard samples with different pretreatments were detected, including 15 alcohols, 1 phenol, 2 ketones, 12 aldehydes, 3 nitriles, 7 esters, 4 isothiocyanates, 29 hydrocarbons, and 1 other type. OPLS-DA could effectively distinguish fermented mustard samples with different pretreatments, and a total of 45 differentially volatile flavor components (VIP values>1) were screened.https://manu61.magtech.com.cn/zgnz/fileup/0254-5071/PDF/0254-5071-2025-44-3-156.pdfhuarong large leaf mustard|pretreatment method|sensory quality|texture|flavor|physicochemical index
spellingShingle ZHENG Qilin, DENG Fangming, ZHAO Lingyan
Effect of different pretreatment methods on the quality of fermented mustard
Zhongguo niangzao
huarong large leaf mustard|pretreatment method|sensory quality|texture|flavor|physicochemical index
title Effect of different pretreatment methods on the quality of fermented mustard
title_full Effect of different pretreatment methods on the quality of fermented mustard
title_fullStr Effect of different pretreatment methods on the quality of fermented mustard
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different pretreatment methods on the quality of fermented mustard
title_short Effect of different pretreatment methods on the quality of fermented mustard
title_sort effect of different pretreatment methods on the quality of fermented mustard
topic huarong large leaf mustard|pretreatment method|sensory quality|texture|flavor|physicochemical index
url https://manu61.magtech.com.cn/zgnz/fileup/0254-5071/PDF/0254-5071-2025-44-3-156.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengqilindengfangmingzhaolingyan effectofdifferentpretreatmentmethodsonthequalityoffermentedmustard