Assessing participants’ experiences with the COVID-19 symptom diary in a clinical trial

Abstract During a phase 2/3 study of twice-daily nirmatrelvir 300 mg coadministered with ritonavir 100 mg versus placebo for 5 days (NCT05011513), participants reported presence and severity of COVID-19 symptoms using a COVID-19 symptom diary in accordance with FDA guidance. Here, we aimed to evalua...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. Michelle Brown, Chisom Kanu, Magdalena Harrington
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-08-01
Series:Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00901-5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849234913351434240
author T. Michelle Brown
Chisom Kanu
Magdalena Harrington
author_facet T. Michelle Brown
Chisom Kanu
Magdalena Harrington
author_sort T. Michelle Brown
collection DOAJ
description Abstract During a phase 2/3 study of twice-daily nirmatrelvir 300 mg coadministered with ritonavir 100 mg versus placebo for 5 days (NCT05011513), participants reported presence and severity of COVID-19 symptoms using a COVID-19 symptom diary in accordance with FDA guidance. Here, we aimed to evaluate the content validity of the COVID-19 symptom diary and global impression items through qualitative interviews as recommended by the FDA. Study participants kept a daily electronic diary to record the presence and severity of 14 COVID-19 symptoms (stuffy or runny nose, sore throat, shortness of breath, cough, low energy or tiredness, muscle or body aches, headache, chills/shivering, feeling hot or feverish, nausea, frequency of vomiting, frequency of diarrhea, sense of smell, and sense of taste). They also answered questions regarding 3 global impression items (return to health, return to usual activities, and overall symptom severity). A subset of clinical trial participants was interviewed at study completion to assess content validity of the diary. Overall, 25 participants were interviewed across 10 clinical sites. Each of the 14 symptoms included in the diary were reported by ≥ 1 participant, with low energy/tiredness being reported most frequently (88.0%). Twelve participants (48.0%) reported ≥ 1 symptom that was not captured by the diary, with dizziness being the most common (12.0%). Rates of these symptoms were lower (≤ 12.0%) than the 14 prespecified symptoms included in the diary (16.0−88.0%). Based on participant feedback, all 14 diary items were clear and generally easy to answer using the response scales, and all were interpreted as intended. The 3 global items received similar feedback, although a few participants noted that there were challenges in interpreting the items, describing questions as “vague” and “confusing”, or that responses were too limited; one-third reported having difficulty calculating overall symptom experience for multiple symptoms. Participants reported that the electronic application for the diary and global items was easy to use and enabled the items to be easily completed. Exit interview results support the content validity of the COVID-19 symptom diary and global impression items, with the 14 symptoms included in the diary reflecting the most commonly experienced COVID-19 symptoms. NCT05011513; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05011513 .
format Article
id doaj-art-8e28cdb452484b0eb01aa74e9e05dc97
institution Kabale University
issn 2509-8020
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
spelling doaj-art-8e28cdb452484b0eb01aa74e9e05dc972025-08-20T04:02:56ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Patient-Reported Outcomes2509-80202025-08-01911910.1186/s41687-025-00901-5Assessing participants’ experiences with the COVID-19 symptom diary in a clinical trialT. Michelle Brown0Chisom Kanu1Magdalena Harrington2RTI Health SolutionsRTI Health SolutionsGlobal Access & Value, Pfizer IncAbstract During a phase 2/3 study of twice-daily nirmatrelvir 300 mg coadministered with ritonavir 100 mg versus placebo for 5 days (NCT05011513), participants reported presence and severity of COVID-19 symptoms using a COVID-19 symptom diary in accordance with FDA guidance. Here, we aimed to evaluate the content validity of the COVID-19 symptom diary and global impression items through qualitative interviews as recommended by the FDA. Study participants kept a daily electronic diary to record the presence and severity of 14 COVID-19 symptoms (stuffy or runny nose, sore throat, shortness of breath, cough, low energy or tiredness, muscle or body aches, headache, chills/shivering, feeling hot or feverish, nausea, frequency of vomiting, frequency of diarrhea, sense of smell, and sense of taste). They also answered questions regarding 3 global impression items (return to health, return to usual activities, and overall symptom severity). A subset of clinical trial participants was interviewed at study completion to assess content validity of the diary. Overall, 25 participants were interviewed across 10 clinical sites. Each of the 14 symptoms included in the diary were reported by ≥ 1 participant, with low energy/tiredness being reported most frequently (88.0%). Twelve participants (48.0%) reported ≥ 1 symptom that was not captured by the diary, with dizziness being the most common (12.0%). Rates of these symptoms were lower (≤ 12.0%) than the 14 prespecified symptoms included in the diary (16.0−88.0%). Based on participant feedback, all 14 diary items were clear and generally easy to answer using the response scales, and all were interpreted as intended. The 3 global items received similar feedback, although a few participants noted that there were challenges in interpreting the items, describing questions as “vague” and “confusing”, or that responses were too limited; one-third reported having difficulty calculating overall symptom experience for multiple symptoms. Participants reported that the electronic application for the diary and global items was easy to use and enabled the items to be easily completed. Exit interview results support the content validity of the COVID-19 symptom diary and global impression items, with the 14 symptoms included in the diary reflecting the most commonly experienced COVID-19 symptoms. NCT05011513; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05011513 .https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00901-5COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Patient-reported outcomesExit interviewsClinical trial
spellingShingle T. Michelle Brown
Chisom Kanu
Magdalena Harrington
Assessing participants’ experiences with the COVID-19 symptom diary in a clinical trial
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
Patient-reported outcomes
Exit interviews
Clinical trial
title Assessing participants’ experiences with the COVID-19 symptom diary in a clinical trial
title_full Assessing participants’ experiences with the COVID-19 symptom diary in a clinical trial
title_fullStr Assessing participants’ experiences with the COVID-19 symptom diary in a clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Assessing participants’ experiences with the COVID-19 symptom diary in a clinical trial
title_short Assessing participants’ experiences with the COVID-19 symptom diary in a clinical trial
title_sort assessing participants experiences with the covid 19 symptom diary in a clinical trial
topic COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
Patient-reported outcomes
Exit interviews
Clinical trial
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00901-5
work_keys_str_mv AT tmichellebrown assessingparticipantsexperienceswiththecovid19symptomdiaryinaclinicaltrial
AT chisomkanu assessingparticipantsexperienceswiththecovid19symptomdiaryinaclinicaltrial
AT magdalenaharrington assessingparticipantsexperienceswiththecovid19symptomdiaryinaclinicaltrial