Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department

Objective: Return visit to emergency department (ED) is a common phenomenon and has been a clinical indicator of quality of care in ED. Most of previous articles focused on the characteristics of the patients returning within 72 h after ED discharge, while those on subsequent admission are numbered....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sung-Wei Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.tcmjmed.com/article.asp?issn=1016-3190;year=2021;volume=33;issue=2;spage=169;epage=174;aulast=Liu
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850210971126071296
author Sung-Wei Liu
author_facet Sung-Wei Liu
author_sort Sung-Wei Liu
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Return visit to emergency department (ED) is a common phenomenon and has been a clinical indicator of quality of care in ED. Most of previous articles focused on the characteristics of the patients returning within 72 h after ED discharge, while those on subsequent admission are numbered. This study's purpose is to identify risk factors for admission among 72-h return visit in the ED adult population. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a medical center in Eastern Taiwan. The study period was from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013. We excluded patients who left against medical advice or without being seen, who was admitted or transferred at the index ED visit, whose medical records were incomplete, and whose age was below 18 years old. Significant variables were selected based on univariate analysis and later entered into multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for 72-h return admission. Results: We identified 1575 eligible visits, and there were 1,119 visits entering into the final analysis. Male gender (odds ratio [OR] = 1.44), ambulance-transport at return visit (OR = 3.68), senior staff (OR = 1.52), work-up (OR = 3.03), and longer length of stay (LOS) were associated with higher risks of admission among ED 72-h return visits. Age, comorbidity, mode of transport at index visit, consultation, triage, type of illness, outpatient department visit between ED visits, and interval between index and return visits were not significantly associated with return admission.Conclusion: Gender, mode of transportation, staff experience, check-up, and LOS are associated with ED return admission.
format Article
id doaj-art-8e1aab3ee9464331a262aba8df4041a5
institution OA Journals
issn 1016-3190
2223-8956
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Tzu Chi Medical Journal
spelling doaj-art-8e1aab3ee9464331a262aba8df4041a52025-08-20T02:09:40ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsTzu Chi Medical Journal1016-31902223-89562021-01-0133216917410.4103/tcmj.tcmj_155_20Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency departmentSung-Wei LiuObjective: Return visit to emergency department (ED) is a common phenomenon and has been a clinical indicator of quality of care in ED. Most of previous articles focused on the characteristics of the patients returning within 72 h after ED discharge, while those on subsequent admission are numbered. This study's purpose is to identify risk factors for admission among 72-h return visit in the ED adult population. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a medical center in Eastern Taiwan. The study period was from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013. We excluded patients who left against medical advice or without being seen, who was admitted or transferred at the index ED visit, whose medical records were incomplete, and whose age was below 18 years old. Significant variables were selected based on univariate analysis and later entered into multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for 72-h return admission. Results: We identified 1575 eligible visits, and there were 1,119 visits entering into the final analysis. Male gender (odds ratio [OR] = 1.44), ambulance-transport at return visit (OR = 3.68), senior staff (OR = 1.52), work-up (OR = 3.03), and longer length of stay (LOS) were associated with higher risks of admission among ED 72-h return visits. Age, comorbidity, mode of transport at index visit, consultation, triage, type of illness, outpatient department visit between ED visits, and interval between index and return visits were not significantly associated with return admission.Conclusion: Gender, mode of transportation, staff experience, check-up, and LOS are associated with ED return admission.http://www.tcmjmed.com/article.asp?issn=1016-3190;year=2021;volume=33;issue=2;spage=169;epage=174;aulast=Liuadmissionemergency departmentreturn visit
spellingShingle Sung-Wei Liu
Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department
Tzu Chi Medical Journal
admission
emergency department
return visit
title Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department
title_full Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department
title_fullStr Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department
title_short Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department
title_sort risk factors of admission in 72 h return visits to emergency department
topic admission
emergency department
return visit
url http://www.tcmjmed.com/article.asp?issn=1016-3190;year=2021;volume=33;issue=2;spage=169;epage=174;aulast=Liu
work_keys_str_mv AT sungweiliu riskfactorsofadmissionin72hreturnvisitstoemergencydepartment