Can Jurors Disregard Inadmissible Evidence? Using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy to Test Interventions Derived from Cognitive and Social Psychological Theories
Inadmissible evidence generally biases jurors toward guilty verdicts; jurors who hear inadmissible evidence are more likely to convict than jurors not exposed to inadmissible evidence—even when <i>admissible</i> evidence is constant. When inadmissible evidence is introduced, the common l...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Pamela N. Sandberg, Tess M. S. Neal, Karey L. O’Hara |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Behavioral Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/1/7 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Race, wrongful convictions, and Texas: An analysis of the impact of juror and defendant ethnicity on wrongful convictions in Texas
by: Howard-Waddingham, W.
Published: (2018-07-01) -
Making legal sense: on jurors’ discovery of objectivity in Argentina’s experience of lay participation in criminal trials
by: Santiago Abel Amietta
Published: (2025-07-01) -
The Role of Stereotypes in Jurors’ Indian Status Determinations and Guilt Decisions
by: Kimberly Schweitzer, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
Jurymen Seldom Rule Against a Person That They Like: The Relationship Between Emotions Towards a Defendant, the Understanding of Case Facts, and Juror Judgments in Civil Trials
by: Hannah J. Phalen, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
THEORETICAL-HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF JURY TRIALS FORMATION IN RUSSIA
by: I. V. Yermakova
Published: (2011-12-01)