Differential survival outcomes in upper versus lower extremity metastatic bone disease: a retrospective comparative cohort analysis

Abstract Background The rising prevalence of metastatic bone disease (MBDex) of the extremities substantially affects patient quality of life due to skeletal-related events. Determining whether surgical intervention benefits patient survival is crucial in the management of MBDex. However, there is c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chih-Wei Chen, Chih-Chi Su, Jyun-Hao Chen, Jaw-Lin Wang, Tzu-Hao Tseng, Olivier Q. Groot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06079-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849234697170714624
author Chih-Wei Chen
Chih-Chi Su
Jyun-Hao Chen
Jaw-Lin Wang
Tzu-Hao Tseng
Olivier Q. Groot
author_facet Chih-Wei Chen
Chih-Chi Su
Jyun-Hao Chen
Jaw-Lin Wang
Tzu-Hao Tseng
Olivier Q. Groot
author_sort Chih-Wei Chen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The rising prevalence of metastatic bone disease (MBDex) of the extremities substantially affects patient quality of life due to skeletal-related events. Determining whether surgical intervention benefits patient survival is crucial in the management of MBDex. However, there is currently limited evidence regarding the survival impact of upper versus lower extremity involvement. This study aims to evaluate differences in survival outcomes regarding metastatic site, and the impact of operative versus nonoperative management. Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated 1,719 patients with a two-year follow-up period after treatment for MBDex at a major tertiary medical center in Taiwan from 2010 to 2018. Inclusion criteria included patients aged over 20 who underwent operative or nonoperative management. Exclusion criteria involved patients with concurrent upper and lower extremity metastases. Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression models were used to analyze survival and prognostic factors. Results Compared to upper MBDex, lower MBDex patients have poorer pretreatment Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. Lower MBDex was associated with worse two-year survival, particularly among those receiving nonoperative management. Common prognostic factors included ECOG performance status, Charlson’s comorbidities, primary tumor type, and albumin levels, while previous systemic treatment and the presence of visceral and brain metastases were specifically detrimental in lower MBDex. Conclusions Lower MBDex is associated with poorer survival outcomes. Operative management is associated with survival benefit in lower MBDex, a benefit not as pronounced in upper MBDex. These findings highlight the importance of differentiating between upper and lower extremity metastases in survival analyses and prediction.
format Article
id doaj-art-8dcf5c4dec9b4cd9a8c5de8007ef42ca
institution Kabale University
issn 1749-799X
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj-art-8dcf5c4dec9b4cd9a8c5de8007ef42ca2025-08-20T04:03:03ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2025-07-0120111110.1186/s13018-025-06079-2Differential survival outcomes in upper versus lower extremity metastatic bone disease: a retrospective comparative cohort analysisChih-Wei Chen0Chih-Chi Su1Jyun-Hao Chen2Jaw-Lin Wang3Tzu-Hao Tseng4Olivier Q. Groot5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University HospitalDepartment of Medical Education, National Taiwan University HospitalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan UniversityDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center UtrechtAbstract Background The rising prevalence of metastatic bone disease (MBDex) of the extremities substantially affects patient quality of life due to skeletal-related events. Determining whether surgical intervention benefits patient survival is crucial in the management of MBDex. However, there is currently limited evidence regarding the survival impact of upper versus lower extremity involvement. This study aims to evaluate differences in survival outcomes regarding metastatic site, and the impact of operative versus nonoperative management. Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated 1,719 patients with a two-year follow-up period after treatment for MBDex at a major tertiary medical center in Taiwan from 2010 to 2018. Inclusion criteria included patients aged over 20 who underwent operative or nonoperative management. Exclusion criteria involved patients with concurrent upper and lower extremity metastases. Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression models were used to analyze survival and prognostic factors. Results Compared to upper MBDex, lower MBDex patients have poorer pretreatment Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. Lower MBDex was associated with worse two-year survival, particularly among those receiving nonoperative management. Common prognostic factors included ECOG performance status, Charlson’s comorbidities, primary tumor type, and albumin levels, while previous systemic treatment and the presence of visceral and brain metastases were specifically detrimental in lower MBDex. Conclusions Lower MBDex is associated with poorer survival outcomes. Operative management is associated with survival benefit in lower MBDex, a benefit not as pronounced in upper MBDex. These findings highlight the importance of differentiating between upper and lower extremity metastases in survival analyses and prediction.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06079-2Metastatic bone diseaseMetastases of lower extremitiesMetastases of upper extremitiesSurvival
spellingShingle Chih-Wei Chen
Chih-Chi Su
Jyun-Hao Chen
Jaw-Lin Wang
Tzu-Hao Tseng
Olivier Q. Groot
Differential survival outcomes in upper versus lower extremity metastatic bone disease: a retrospective comparative cohort analysis
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Metastatic bone disease
Metastases of lower extremities
Metastases of upper extremities
Survival
title Differential survival outcomes in upper versus lower extremity metastatic bone disease: a retrospective comparative cohort analysis
title_full Differential survival outcomes in upper versus lower extremity metastatic bone disease: a retrospective comparative cohort analysis
title_fullStr Differential survival outcomes in upper versus lower extremity metastatic bone disease: a retrospective comparative cohort analysis
title_full_unstemmed Differential survival outcomes in upper versus lower extremity metastatic bone disease: a retrospective comparative cohort analysis
title_short Differential survival outcomes in upper versus lower extremity metastatic bone disease: a retrospective comparative cohort analysis
title_sort differential survival outcomes in upper versus lower extremity metastatic bone disease a retrospective comparative cohort analysis
topic Metastatic bone disease
Metastases of lower extremities
Metastases of upper extremities
Survival
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06079-2
work_keys_str_mv AT chihweichen differentialsurvivaloutcomesinupperversuslowerextremitymetastaticbonediseasearetrospectivecomparativecohortanalysis
AT chihchisu differentialsurvivaloutcomesinupperversuslowerextremitymetastaticbonediseasearetrospectivecomparativecohortanalysis
AT jyunhaochen differentialsurvivaloutcomesinupperversuslowerextremitymetastaticbonediseasearetrospectivecomparativecohortanalysis
AT jawlinwang differentialsurvivaloutcomesinupperversuslowerextremitymetastaticbonediseasearetrospectivecomparativecohortanalysis
AT tzuhaotseng differentialsurvivaloutcomesinupperversuslowerextremitymetastaticbonediseasearetrospectivecomparativecohortanalysis
AT olivierqgroot differentialsurvivaloutcomesinupperversuslowerextremitymetastaticbonediseasearetrospectivecomparativecohortanalysis