Nominative objects in Korean

This article addresses the hitherto neglected topic of the Korean Nominative Object Construction (NOC) within the Cognitive Grammar (CG) framework. In the NOC, schematically illustrated as [N-NOM N-NOM PSYCH-PRED], the second NP behaves like a direct object. While the construction has puzzled many r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Park Chongwon, Kim Jong-Bok
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2022-09-01
Series:Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0248
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832570444271583232
author Park Chongwon
Kim Jong-Bok
author_facet Park Chongwon
Kim Jong-Bok
author_sort Park Chongwon
collection DOAJ
description This article addresses the hitherto neglected topic of the Korean Nominative Object Construction (NOC) within the Cognitive Grammar (CG) framework. In the NOC, schematically illustrated as [N-NOM N-NOM PSYCH-PRED], the second NP behaves like a direct object. While the construction has puzzled many researchers in different languages, and a sizable amount of research exists, relatively little attention has been paid to Korean. It is worth noting that the findings made in the extant generative-linguistic research – including the research on Japanese, which exhibits significant typological similarities to Korean – are not sufficient to account for the Korean data. After identifying the properties of the Korean NOC, we demonstrate that the NOC merely reflects how the experiencer conceptualizes the stimulus that exists in a certain domain of mental experience within her mind. This internal representation of the stimulus is marked nominative by being the sole participant in the relationship profiled by the psychological verb at the lower level of organization. At the higher level of organization, the first nominal is the primary participant as an experiencer, thereby receiving nominative case as well. Our analysis is extended to the desiderative construction, which exhibits similar patterns to the PSYCH-PRED NOC but allows alternation of case in the second nominal between nominative and accusative marking. The case alternation is motivated by two different types of construals of the same conceptual base. The nominative marking arises when the embedded transitive relationship is backgrounded, whereas the accusative marking becomes available when the profile is given to the transitive relationship. We demonstrate that the source of the case alternation lies in the profile, rejecting the dichotomous division of the construction based on its mono- or bi-clausal properties.
format Article
id doaj-art-8d9362dfb4544022b11a7f420635ece5
institution Kabale University
issn 0024-3949
1613-396X
language English
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Linguistics
spelling doaj-art-8d9362dfb4544022b11a7f420635ece52025-02-02T15:46:00ZengDe GruyterLinguistics0024-39491613-396X2022-09-016051487153710.1515/ling-2020-0248Nominative objects in KoreanPark Chongwon0Kim Jong-Bok1Department of English, Linguistics, and Writing Studies, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, USASchool of English, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, KoreaThis article addresses the hitherto neglected topic of the Korean Nominative Object Construction (NOC) within the Cognitive Grammar (CG) framework. In the NOC, schematically illustrated as [N-NOM N-NOM PSYCH-PRED], the second NP behaves like a direct object. While the construction has puzzled many researchers in different languages, and a sizable amount of research exists, relatively little attention has been paid to Korean. It is worth noting that the findings made in the extant generative-linguistic research – including the research on Japanese, which exhibits significant typological similarities to Korean – are not sufficient to account for the Korean data. After identifying the properties of the Korean NOC, we demonstrate that the NOC merely reflects how the experiencer conceptualizes the stimulus that exists in a certain domain of mental experience within her mind. This internal representation of the stimulus is marked nominative by being the sole participant in the relationship profiled by the psychological verb at the lower level of organization. At the higher level of organization, the first nominal is the primary participant as an experiencer, thereby receiving nominative case as well. Our analysis is extended to the desiderative construction, which exhibits similar patterns to the PSYCH-PRED NOC but allows alternation of case in the second nominal between nominative and accusative marking. The case alternation is motivated by two different types of construals of the same conceptual base. The nominative marking arises when the embedded transitive relationship is backgrounded, whereas the accusative marking becomes available when the profile is given to the transitive relationship. We demonstrate that the source of the case alternation lies in the profile, rejecting the dichotomous division of the construction based on its mono- or bi-clausal properties.https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0248cognitive grammar (cg)complex predicatedesiderative constructionkoreannominative object construction (noc))psychological verbs
spellingShingle Park Chongwon
Kim Jong-Bok
Nominative objects in Korean
Linguistics
cognitive grammar (cg)
complex predicate
desiderative construction
korean
nominative object construction (noc))
psychological verbs
title Nominative objects in Korean
title_full Nominative objects in Korean
title_fullStr Nominative objects in Korean
title_full_unstemmed Nominative objects in Korean
title_short Nominative objects in Korean
title_sort nominative objects in korean
topic cognitive grammar (cg)
complex predicate
desiderative construction
korean
nominative object construction (noc))
psychological verbs
url https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0248
work_keys_str_mv AT parkchongwon nominativeobjectsinkorean
AT kimjongbok nominativeobjectsinkorean