Consumer‐Led Codesign of an Effective Online Consumer and Community Involvement Audit Tool
ABSTRACT Introduction There is evidence that consumer and community involvement (CCI) improves the quality and outcomes of health research. However, there is currently limited support for organisations to plan, implement and evaluate CCI activity. We aimed to codesign an audit tool that will enable...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Health Expectations |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70249 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850151544617435136 |
|---|---|
| author | Asvini K. Subasinghe Jo Wilkie Rebekah Puls Tanya Tuffrey Jacqueline A. Boyle |
| author_facet | Asvini K. Subasinghe Jo Wilkie Rebekah Puls Tanya Tuffrey Jacqueline A. Boyle |
| author_sort | Asvini K. Subasinghe |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT Introduction There is evidence that consumer and community involvement (CCI) improves the quality and outcomes of health research. However, there is currently limited support for organisations to plan, implement and evaluate CCI activity. We aimed to codesign an audit tool that will enable organisations, researchers, community members and funders to measure the extent and nature of CCI in their respective settings. The tool was based on the Western Australian Health Translation Network's CCI Handbook. Methods We offered optional online workshops to inform participants about the study (total n = 9). Following this, we obtained feedback on the appropriateness of the Handbook and audit tool (n = 11). Finally, using Qualtrics surveys, we assessed the quality and effectiveness of the tool in evaluating CCI with 10 researchers, 6 funders, and 1 community member (total n = 17) sourced from networks within Monash University and the Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science. Results Overall participants had a positive response to the audit tool and believed it had value in quantifying direct implementation of CCI in their workplaces. Gaps identified included the need to address health and research literacy of community members, culturally responsive approaches when working with community members from migrant backgrounds and an identified need for visual and digital resources. Conclusions Application of the tool enabled participants to identify their respective CCI strengths, weakness and opportunities for improving the meaningful involvement of community members and community in their research activities and to support equity in these processes. Patient or Public Contribution The public participated in workshops providing feedback on the general structure of the audit tool as well as testing it within their research projects. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8d745fe4183a4c188149bb8d18e5b770 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1369-6513 1369-7625 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Health Expectations |
| spelling | doaj-art-8d745fe4183a4c188149bb8d18e5b7702025-08-20T02:26:13ZengWileyHealth Expectations1369-65131369-76252025-04-01282n/an/a10.1111/hex.70249Consumer‐Led Codesign of an Effective Online Consumer and Community Involvement Audit ToolAsvini K. Subasinghe0Jo Wilkie1Rebekah Puls2Tanya Tuffrey3Jacqueline A. Boyle4Eastern Health Clinical School Monash University Box Hill Victoria AustraliaWestern Australian Health Translation Network Nedlands Western Australia AustraliaPerron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science Nedlands Western Australia AustraliaWestern Australian Health Translation Network Nedlands Western Australia AustraliaEastern Health Clinical School Monash University Box Hill Victoria AustraliaABSTRACT Introduction There is evidence that consumer and community involvement (CCI) improves the quality and outcomes of health research. However, there is currently limited support for organisations to plan, implement and evaluate CCI activity. We aimed to codesign an audit tool that will enable organisations, researchers, community members and funders to measure the extent and nature of CCI in their respective settings. The tool was based on the Western Australian Health Translation Network's CCI Handbook. Methods We offered optional online workshops to inform participants about the study (total n = 9). Following this, we obtained feedback on the appropriateness of the Handbook and audit tool (n = 11). Finally, using Qualtrics surveys, we assessed the quality and effectiveness of the tool in evaluating CCI with 10 researchers, 6 funders, and 1 community member (total n = 17) sourced from networks within Monash University and the Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science. Results Overall participants had a positive response to the audit tool and believed it had value in quantifying direct implementation of CCI in their workplaces. Gaps identified included the need to address health and research literacy of community members, culturally responsive approaches when working with community members from migrant backgrounds and an identified need for visual and digital resources. Conclusions Application of the tool enabled participants to identify their respective CCI strengths, weakness and opportunities for improving the meaningful involvement of community members and community in their research activities and to support equity in these processes. Patient or Public Contribution The public participated in workshops providing feedback on the general structure of the audit tool as well as testing it within their research projects.https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70249community involvementconsumer participationequityevaluation audithealthliteracy |
| spellingShingle | Asvini K. Subasinghe Jo Wilkie Rebekah Puls Tanya Tuffrey Jacqueline A. Boyle Consumer‐Led Codesign of an Effective Online Consumer and Community Involvement Audit Tool Health Expectations community involvement consumer participation equity evaluation audit health literacy |
| title | Consumer‐Led Codesign of an Effective Online Consumer and Community Involvement Audit Tool |
| title_full | Consumer‐Led Codesign of an Effective Online Consumer and Community Involvement Audit Tool |
| title_fullStr | Consumer‐Led Codesign of an Effective Online Consumer and Community Involvement Audit Tool |
| title_full_unstemmed | Consumer‐Led Codesign of an Effective Online Consumer and Community Involvement Audit Tool |
| title_short | Consumer‐Led Codesign of an Effective Online Consumer and Community Involvement Audit Tool |
| title_sort | consumer led codesign of an effective online consumer and community involvement audit tool |
| topic | community involvement consumer participation equity evaluation audit health literacy |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70249 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT asviniksubasinghe consumerledcodesignofaneffectiveonlineconsumerandcommunityinvolvementaudittool AT jowilkie consumerledcodesignofaneffectiveonlineconsumerandcommunityinvolvementaudittool AT rebekahpuls consumerledcodesignofaneffectiveonlineconsumerandcommunityinvolvementaudittool AT tanyatuffrey consumerledcodesignofaneffectiveonlineconsumerandcommunityinvolvementaudittool AT jacquelineaboyle consumerledcodesignofaneffectiveonlineconsumerandcommunityinvolvementaudittool |