Cardiogenic Shock: Protocols, Teams, Centers, and Networks
The mortality of cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unacceptably high. Delays in the recognition of CS and access to disease-modifying or hemodynamically stabilizing interventions likely contribute to poor outcomes. In parallel to successful initiatives in other disease states, such as acute ST-elevatio...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Alex F Warren, Carolyn Rosner, Raghav Gattani, Alex G Truesdell, Alastair G Proudfoot |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Radcliffe Medical Media
2021-10-01
|
| Series: | US Cardiology Review |
| Online Access: | https://www.uscjournal.com/articleindex/usc.2021.10 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The Contemporary Cardiogenic Shock ‘Playbook’
by: Alexander G Truesdell
Published: (2021-11-01) -
Guideline‐directed medical therapy implementation during hospitalization for cardiogenic shock
by: Matthew G. Dimond, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Cardiac shock care center — the next stage in the treatment of cardiogenic shock
by: S. A. Boytsov, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01) -
Impact of a Cardiology-Based Shock Team on Institutional Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use for Cardiogenic Shock
by: Moein Bayat Mokhtari, MD, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
Blueprint for Building and Sustaining a Cardiogenic Shock Program: Qualitative Survey of 12 US Programs
by: Raymond M. Yau, MD, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01)