Analysis of Suhrawardī’s Opinion on the Issue of General Principles and Mullā Ṣadrā’s Confrontation
Muslim philosophers have been influenced by the views of ancient Greek philosophers in the issue of generality (generic) and partiality, so that the essence of the views presented in the Islamic era can be seen in the opinions of Plato and Aristotle. Avicenna, like Aristotle, has denied the theory o...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Razavi University of Islamic Sciences
2022-08-01
|
| Series: | آموزههای فلسفه اسلامي |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ipd.razavi.ac.ir/article_1676_9c140ba2a88dcd693e8c8df04f6c1992.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849706674230657024 |
|---|---|
| author | Muhammad Hosseinzadeh |
| author_facet | Muhammad Hosseinzadeh |
| author_sort | Muhammad Hosseinzadeh |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Muslim philosophers have been influenced by the views of ancient Greek philosophers in the issue of generality (generic) and partiality, so that the essence of the views presented in the Islamic era can be seen in the opinions of Plato and Aristotle. Avicenna, like Aristotle, has denied the theory of Forms (theory of Ideas) and rejected Plato’s view about the general and partial issue. Unlike Avicenna, Suhrawardī has accepted the Platonic theory of Forms, but he has denied the Platonic generality in the issue of generality (generic) and partiality and has had a common opinion in explaining of “generic” (Arabic: کلّی) with Aristotle and Avicenna, which means that he, like Avicenna, considers generality to be the same of mental concept as independently subsistent. Of course, Shaikh al-ʿIshraq (Master of Illumination) has opposed Avicenna in some minor aspects of this issue and has presented innovations. This article has explained Suhrawardī’s point of view on the issue of generality (generic) and partiality by an analytical-descriptive method and studied the reason of his tendency to Peripatetic explanation of the “generic”. Suhrawardī’s critiques of Sinavi’s approach have also been explained in this analytical study, and their impact on Mullā Ṣadrā’s critique on Peripatetic’s theory has been shown. Also, Mullā Ṣadrā’s encounter with Suhrawardī’s view on the issue of generality (generic) has been analyzed. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8d4c2aca786e4b16b284d3ee2ca1789e |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2251-9386 2783-4026 |
| language | fas |
| publishDate | 2022-08-01 |
| publisher | Razavi University of Islamic Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | آموزههای فلسفه اسلامي |
| spelling | doaj-art-8d4c2aca786e4b16b284d3ee2ca1789e2025-08-20T03:16:07ZfasRazavi University of Islamic Sciencesآموزههای فلسفه اسلامي2251-93862783-40262022-08-01173010510310.30513/ipd.2023.4172.13501676Analysis of Suhrawardī’s Opinion on the Issue of General Principles and Mullā Ṣadrā’s ConfrontationMuhammad Hosseinzadeh0Assistant professor at Iranian Research Institute of Hikmat & PhilosophyMuslim philosophers have been influenced by the views of ancient Greek philosophers in the issue of generality (generic) and partiality, so that the essence of the views presented in the Islamic era can be seen in the opinions of Plato and Aristotle. Avicenna, like Aristotle, has denied the theory of Forms (theory of Ideas) and rejected Plato’s view about the general and partial issue. Unlike Avicenna, Suhrawardī has accepted the Platonic theory of Forms, but he has denied the Platonic generality in the issue of generality (generic) and partiality and has had a common opinion in explaining of “generic” (Arabic: کلّی) with Aristotle and Avicenna, which means that he, like Avicenna, considers generality to be the same of mental concept as independently subsistent. Of course, Shaikh al-ʿIshraq (Master of Illumination) has opposed Avicenna in some minor aspects of this issue and has presented innovations. This article has explained Suhrawardī’s point of view on the issue of generality (generic) and partiality by an analytical-descriptive method and studied the reason of his tendency to Peripatetic explanation of the “generic”. Suhrawardī’s critiques of Sinavi’s approach have also been explained in this analytical study, and their impact on Mullā Ṣadrā’s critique on Peripatetic’s theory has been shown. Also, Mullā Ṣadrā’s encounter with Suhrawardī’s view on the issue of generality (generic) has been analyzed.https://ipd.razavi.ac.ir/article_1676_9c140ba2a88dcd693e8c8df04f6c1992.pdfgeneralpartialplatonic theory of forms (theory of ideas)naturesuhrawardī |
| spellingShingle | Muhammad Hosseinzadeh Analysis of Suhrawardī’s Opinion on the Issue of General Principles and Mullā Ṣadrā’s Confrontation آموزههای فلسفه اسلامي general partial platonic theory of forms (theory of ideas) nature suhrawardī |
| title | Analysis of Suhrawardī’s Opinion on the Issue of General Principles and Mullā Ṣadrā’s Confrontation |
| title_full | Analysis of Suhrawardī’s Opinion on the Issue of General Principles and Mullā Ṣadrā’s Confrontation |
| title_fullStr | Analysis of Suhrawardī’s Opinion on the Issue of General Principles and Mullā Ṣadrā’s Confrontation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Suhrawardī’s Opinion on the Issue of General Principles and Mullā Ṣadrā’s Confrontation |
| title_short | Analysis of Suhrawardī’s Opinion on the Issue of General Principles and Mullā Ṣadrā’s Confrontation |
| title_sort | analysis of suhrawardi s opinion on the issue of general principles and mulla sadra s confrontation |
| topic | general partial platonic theory of forms (theory of ideas) nature suhrawardī |
| url | https://ipd.razavi.ac.ir/article_1676_9c140ba2a88dcd693e8c8df04f6c1992.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT muhammadhosseinzadeh analysisofsuhrawardisopinionontheissueofgeneralprinciplesandmullasadrasconfrontation |