Use of Step-Section Histopathology to Evaluate F-Fluorocholine PET Sextant Localization of Prostate Cancer

To assess positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorocholine for sextant localization of malignant prostate tumors. Histopathologic analysis was performed on step-sectioned whole-mounted prostate specimens from 15 patients who underwent PET with fluorocholine prior to radical prostate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandi A. Kwee, Gregory P. Thibault, Richard S. Stack, Marc N. Coel, Bungo Furusato, Isabell A. Sesterhenn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2008-01-01
Series:Molecular Imaging
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2008.00002
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841564474176176128
author Sandi A. Kwee
Gregory P. Thibault
Richard S. Stack
Marc N. Coel
Bungo Furusato
Isabell A. Sesterhenn
author_facet Sandi A. Kwee
Gregory P. Thibault
Richard S. Stack
Marc N. Coel
Bungo Furusato
Isabell A. Sesterhenn
author_sort Sandi A. Kwee
collection DOAJ
description To assess positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorocholine for sextant localization of malignant prostate tumors. Histopathologic analysis was performed on step-sectioned whole-mounted prostate specimens from 15 patients who underwent PET with fluorocholine prior to radical prostatectomy. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) corresponding to prostate sextants on PET was measured by region of interest analysis and compared with histopathologic results. Histopathology demonstrated malignant involvement in 61 of 90 prostate sextants. The mean total tumor volume per specimen was 4.9 mL (range 0.01–28.7 mL). Mean SUVmax was 6.0 ± 2.0 in malignant sextants and 3.8 ± 1.4 in benign sextants ( p < .0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82 for sextant detection of malignancy based on SUVmax measurement. Tumor diameter directly correlated with sextant SUVmax in malignant sextants ( r = .54, p < .05). In 13 subjects, the largest tumor in the specimen corresponded to the sextant with the highest SUVmax. Fluorocholine PET can serve to localize dominant areas of malignancy in patients with prostate cancer. However, PET with fluorocholine may fail to identify sextants with smaller volumes of malignancy.
format Article
id doaj-art-8d40fea185004c59b1f349a807020234
institution Kabale University
issn 1536-0121
language English
publishDate 2008-01-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Molecular Imaging
spelling doaj-art-8d40fea185004c59b1f349a8070202342025-01-02T22:38:08ZengSAGE PublishingMolecular Imaging1536-01212008-01-01710.2310/7290.2008.0000210.2310_7290.2008.00002Use of Step-Section Histopathology to Evaluate F-Fluorocholine PET Sextant Localization of Prostate CancerSandi A. KweeGregory P. ThibaultRichard S. StackMarc N. CoelBungo FurusatoIsabell A. SesterhennTo assess positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorocholine for sextant localization of malignant prostate tumors. Histopathologic analysis was performed on step-sectioned whole-mounted prostate specimens from 15 patients who underwent PET with fluorocholine prior to radical prostatectomy. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) corresponding to prostate sextants on PET was measured by region of interest analysis and compared with histopathologic results. Histopathology demonstrated malignant involvement in 61 of 90 prostate sextants. The mean total tumor volume per specimen was 4.9 mL (range 0.01–28.7 mL). Mean SUVmax was 6.0 ± 2.0 in malignant sextants and 3.8 ± 1.4 in benign sextants ( p < .0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82 for sextant detection of malignancy based on SUVmax measurement. Tumor diameter directly correlated with sextant SUVmax in malignant sextants ( r = .54, p < .05). In 13 subjects, the largest tumor in the specimen corresponded to the sextant with the highest SUVmax. Fluorocholine PET can serve to localize dominant areas of malignancy in patients with prostate cancer. However, PET with fluorocholine may fail to identify sextants with smaller volumes of malignancy.https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2008.00002
spellingShingle Sandi A. Kwee
Gregory P. Thibault
Richard S. Stack
Marc N. Coel
Bungo Furusato
Isabell A. Sesterhenn
Use of Step-Section Histopathology to Evaluate F-Fluorocholine PET Sextant Localization of Prostate Cancer
Molecular Imaging
title Use of Step-Section Histopathology to Evaluate F-Fluorocholine PET Sextant Localization of Prostate Cancer
title_full Use of Step-Section Histopathology to Evaluate F-Fluorocholine PET Sextant Localization of Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Use of Step-Section Histopathology to Evaluate F-Fluorocholine PET Sextant Localization of Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Use of Step-Section Histopathology to Evaluate F-Fluorocholine PET Sextant Localization of Prostate Cancer
title_short Use of Step-Section Histopathology to Evaluate F-Fluorocholine PET Sextant Localization of Prostate Cancer
title_sort use of step section histopathology to evaluate f fluorocholine pet sextant localization of prostate cancer
url https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2008.00002
work_keys_str_mv AT sandiakwee useofstepsectionhistopathologytoevaluateffluorocholinepetsextantlocalizationofprostatecancer
AT gregorypthibault useofstepsectionhistopathologytoevaluateffluorocholinepetsextantlocalizationofprostatecancer
AT richardsstack useofstepsectionhistopathologytoevaluateffluorocholinepetsextantlocalizationofprostatecancer
AT marcncoel useofstepsectionhistopathologytoevaluateffluorocholinepetsextantlocalizationofprostatecancer
AT bungofurusato useofstepsectionhistopathologytoevaluateffluorocholinepetsextantlocalizationofprostatecancer
AT isabellasesterhenn useofstepsectionhistopathologytoevaluateffluorocholinepetsextantlocalizationofprostatecancer