Measures of knee internal and external rotation made with a digital inclinometer are consistent with the measures made with an electromagnetic tracking system

Abstract Purpose Individuals with excessive knee rotation have higher levels of dysfunction and disability. An inexpensive, and reliable method to assess knee internal (IR) and external (ER) rotation will improve the assessment of knee injuries. The study explored the reliability and measurement err...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark K. Timmons, Hunter G. Copley, Dustin T. Darnell, Seth T. Jude, Gary McIlvain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70209
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850151996802203648
author Mark K. Timmons
Hunter G. Copley
Dustin T. Darnell
Seth T. Jude
Gary McIlvain
author_facet Mark K. Timmons
Hunter G. Copley
Dustin T. Darnell
Seth T. Jude
Gary McIlvain
author_sort Mark K. Timmons
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose Individuals with excessive knee rotation have higher levels of dysfunction and disability. An inexpensive, and reliable method to assess knee internal (IR) and external (ER) rotation will improve the assessment of knee injuries. The study explored the reliability and measurement error of two methods of knee rotation measurement. The study tested the hypothesis that the digital inclinometer will provide reliable measures of knee internal and external rotation and that the digital inclinometer measurements will be consistent with the measurements made with the electromagnetic tracking system. Methods Twenty (20) participants without knee injury participated. Knee IR and ER were measured using electromagnetic tracking and a digital inclinometer. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(2,1)) was calculated for both techniques. Results The within device ICC values ranged from 0.826 to 0.939 for both devices. The within‐device minimal detectable change (MDC) ranged from 1.2° to 1.9°. The ICC values for EI and IR measures collapsed between the devices, ranged from 0.717 to 0.859. The MDC calculated between devices ranged from 1.6° to 1.9°. Conclusion The results of the current study show that knee IR and ER can be measured reliably with both measurement techniques. The measurement of knee ER and IR did not differ between the two devices or between the right and left sides. Level of Evidence Level IV, diagnostic, case series study.
format Article
id doaj-art-8d38f786a74542508fa27798e543eb84
institution OA Journals
issn 2197-1153
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
spelling doaj-art-8d38f786a74542508fa27798e543eb842025-08-20T02:26:05ZengWileyJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics2197-11532025-01-01121n/an/a10.1002/jeo2.70209Measures of knee internal and external rotation made with a digital inclinometer are consistent with the measures made with an electromagnetic tracking systemMark K. Timmons0Hunter G. Copley1Dustin T. Darnell2Seth T. Jude3Gary McIlvain4School of Health and Movement Sciences, College of Health Professions, Marshall University Huntington West Virginia USASchool of Health and Movement Sciences, College of Health Professions, Marshall University Huntington West Virginia USASchool of Health and Movement Sciences, College of Health Professions, Marshall University Huntington West Virginia USASchool of Health and Movement Sciences, College of Health Professions, Marshall University Huntington West Virginia USASchool of Health and Movement Sciences, College of Health Professions, Marshall University Huntington West Virginia USAAbstract Purpose Individuals with excessive knee rotation have higher levels of dysfunction and disability. An inexpensive, and reliable method to assess knee internal (IR) and external (ER) rotation will improve the assessment of knee injuries. The study explored the reliability and measurement error of two methods of knee rotation measurement. The study tested the hypothesis that the digital inclinometer will provide reliable measures of knee internal and external rotation and that the digital inclinometer measurements will be consistent with the measurements made with the electromagnetic tracking system. Methods Twenty (20) participants without knee injury participated. Knee IR and ER were measured using electromagnetic tracking and a digital inclinometer. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(2,1)) was calculated for both techniques. Results The within device ICC values ranged from 0.826 to 0.939 for both devices. The within‐device minimal detectable change (MDC) ranged from 1.2° to 1.9°. The ICC values for EI and IR measures collapsed between the devices, ranged from 0.717 to 0.859. The MDC calculated between devices ranged from 1.6° to 1.9°. Conclusion The results of the current study show that knee IR and ER can be measured reliably with both measurement techniques. The measurement of knee ER and IR did not differ between the two devices or between the right and left sides. Level of Evidence Level IV, diagnostic, case series study.https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70209knee rotationknee stabilitymedial collateral ligament
spellingShingle Mark K. Timmons
Hunter G. Copley
Dustin T. Darnell
Seth T. Jude
Gary McIlvain
Measures of knee internal and external rotation made with a digital inclinometer are consistent with the measures made with an electromagnetic tracking system
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
knee rotation
knee stability
medial collateral ligament
title Measures of knee internal and external rotation made with a digital inclinometer are consistent with the measures made with an electromagnetic tracking system
title_full Measures of knee internal and external rotation made with a digital inclinometer are consistent with the measures made with an electromagnetic tracking system
title_fullStr Measures of knee internal and external rotation made with a digital inclinometer are consistent with the measures made with an electromagnetic tracking system
title_full_unstemmed Measures of knee internal and external rotation made with a digital inclinometer are consistent with the measures made with an electromagnetic tracking system
title_short Measures of knee internal and external rotation made with a digital inclinometer are consistent with the measures made with an electromagnetic tracking system
title_sort measures of knee internal and external rotation made with a digital inclinometer are consistent with the measures made with an electromagnetic tracking system
topic knee rotation
knee stability
medial collateral ligament
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70209
work_keys_str_mv AT markktimmons measuresofkneeinternalandexternalrotationmadewithadigitalinclinometerareconsistentwiththemeasuresmadewithanelectromagnetictrackingsystem
AT huntergcopley measuresofkneeinternalandexternalrotationmadewithadigitalinclinometerareconsistentwiththemeasuresmadewithanelectromagnetictrackingsystem
AT dustintdarnell measuresofkneeinternalandexternalrotationmadewithadigitalinclinometerareconsistentwiththemeasuresmadewithanelectromagnetictrackingsystem
AT sethtjude measuresofkneeinternalandexternalrotationmadewithadigitalinclinometerareconsistentwiththemeasuresmadewithanelectromagnetictrackingsystem
AT garymcilvain measuresofkneeinternalandexternalrotationmadewithadigitalinclinometerareconsistentwiththemeasuresmadewithanelectromagnetictrackingsystem