Processing at-issue and non-at-issue content: Evoked and induced brain activities reveal early and long-lasting differences.

The processing of context-dependent expressions has mostly been studied using metaphors, irony or indirect requests. We add to the literature by monitoring the processing of modal particles (MPs) like German ruhig. These lexemes are ambiguous between a modal particle reading and a counterpart readin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Czypionka, Laura Reimer, Mariya Kharaman, Carsten Eulitz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321953
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850269854612848640
author Anna Czypionka
Laura Reimer
Mariya Kharaman
Carsten Eulitz
author_facet Anna Czypionka
Laura Reimer
Mariya Kharaman
Carsten Eulitz
author_sort Anna Czypionka
collection DOAJ
description The processing of context-dependent expressions has mostly been studied using metaphors, irony or indirect requests. We add to the literature by monitoring the processing of modal particles (MPs) like German ruhig. These lexemes are ambiguous between a modal particle reading and a counterpart reading. While the counterpart contributes at-issue or propositional meaning to the sentence and affects truth conditions, the modal particle contributes non-at-issue meaning, expressing speaker attitudes or linking the sentence to the discourse. In the present study we disambiguated the readings via a preceding context and analysed event-related potentials and the oscillatory brain responses to critical sentences with identical surface forms. Our results show that in comparison to their counterparts, modal particles are associated with enhanced P600 amplitudes on the target lexemes and in the spillover region, and with enhanced P200 amplitudes on target lexemes. In addition, modal particles do not show the gamma power enhancement visible for counterparts. We interpret our findings as showing increased processing cost for modal particles due to them contributing to a higher dimension of meaning. The differences in oscillatory brain activity between both readings may reflect the lack of at-issue meaning contribution for modal particles. Our findings are in line with reports of enhanced P600 amplitudes for semantically and pragmatically complex readings in the literature on context-dependent expressions, and open various future ways of research to check the claims of different models on the processing of complex semantic and pragmatic information.
format Article
id doaj-art-8d28cf4110d14700a7a7d80fa7618147
institution OA Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-8d28cf4110d14700a7a7d80fa76181472025-08-20T01:52:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01205e032195310.1371/journal.pone.0321953Processing at-issue and non-at-issue content: Evoked and induced brain activities reveal early and long-lasting differences.Anna CzypionkaLaura ReimerMariya KharamanCarsten EulitzThe processing of context-dependent expressions has mostly been studied using metaphors, irony or indirect requests. We add to the literature by monitoring the processing of modal particles (MPs) like German ruhig. These lexemes are ambiguous between a modal particle reading and a counterpart reading. While the counterpart contributes at-issue or propositional meaning to the sentence and affects truth conditions, the modal particle contributes non-at-issue meaning, expressing speaker attitudes or linking the sentence to the discourse. In the present study we disambiguated the readings via a preceding context and analysed event-related potentials and the oscillatory brain responses to critical sentences with identical surface forms. Our results show that in comparison to their counterparts, modal particles are associated with enhanced P600 amplitudes on the target lexemes and in the spillover region, and with enhanced P200 amplitudes on target lexemes. In addition, modal particles do not show the gamma power enhancement visible for counterparts. We interpret our findings as showing increased processing cost for modal particles due to them contributing to a higher dimension of meaning. The differences in oscillatory brain activity between both readings may reflect the lack of at-issue meaning contribution for modal particles. Our findings are in line with reports of enhanced P600 amplitudes for semantically and pragmatically complex readings in the literature on context-dependent expressions, and open various future ways of research to check the claims of different models on the processing of complex semantic and pragmatic information.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321953
spellingShingle Anna Czypionka
Laura Reimer
Mariya Kharaman
Carsten Eulitz
Processing at-issue and non-at-issue content: Evoked and induced brain activities reveal early and long-lasting differences.
PLoS ONE
title Processing at-issue and non-at-issue content: Evoked and induced brain activities reveal early and long-lasting differences.
title_full Processing at-issue and non-at-issue content: Evoked and induced brain activities reveal early and long-lasting differences.
title_fullStr Processing at-issue and non-at-issue content: Evoked and induced brain activities reveal early and long-lasting differences.
title_full_unstemmed Processing at-issue and non-at-issue content: Evoked and induced brain activities reveal early and long-lasting differences.
title_short Processing at-issue and non-at-issue content: Evoked and induced brain activities reveal early and long-lasting differences.
title_sort processing at issue and non at issue content evoked and induced brain activities reveal early and long lasting differences
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321953
work_keys_str_mv AT annaczypionka processingatissueandnonatissuecontentevokedandinducedbrainactivitiesrevealearlyandlonglastingdifferences
AT laurareimer processingatissueandnonatissuecontentevokedandinducedbrainactivitiesrevealearlyandlonglastingdifferences
AT mariyakharaman processingatissueandnonatissuecontentevokedandinducedbrainactivitiesrevealearlyandlonglastingdifferences
AT carsteneulitz processingatissueandnonatissuecontentevokedandinducedbrainactivitiesrevealearlyandlonglastingdifferences