An Artificial Intelligence Generated Automated Algorithm to Measure Total Kidney Volume in ADPKD
Introduction: Accurate tools to inform individual prognosis in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) are lacking. Here, we report an artificial intelligence (AI)-generated method for routinely measuring total kidney volume (TKV). Methods: An ensemble U-net algorithm was...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2024-02-01
|
| Series: | Kidney International Reports |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024923015711 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Introduction: Accurate tools to inform individual prognosis in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) are lacking. Here, we report an artificial intelligence (AI)-generated method for routinely measuring total kidney volume (TKV). Methods: An ensemble U-net algorithm was created using the nnUNet approach. The training and internal cross-validation cohort consisted of all 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data acquired using 5 different MRI scanners (454 kidneys, 227 scans) in the CYSTic consortium, which was first manually segmented by a single human operator. As an independent validation cohort, we utilized 48 sequential clinical MRI scans with reference results of manual segmentation acquired by 6 individual analysts at a single center. The tool was then implemented for clinical use and its performance analyzed. Results: The training or internal validation cohort was younger (mean age 44.0 vs. 51.5 years) and the female-to-male ratio higher (1.2 vs. 0.94) compared to the clinical validation cohort. The majority of CYSTic patients had PKD1 mutations (79%) and typical disease (Mayo Imaging class 1, 86%). The median DICE score on the clinical validation data set between the algorithm and human analysts was 0.96 for left and right kidneys with a median TKV error of −1.8%. The time taken to manually segment kidneys in the CYSTic data set was 56 (±28) minutes, whereas manual corrections of the algorithm output took 8.5 (±9.2) minutes per scan. Conclusion: Our AI-based algorithm demonstrates performance comparable to manual segmentation. Its rapidity and precision in real-world clinical cases demonstrate its suitability for clinical application. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2468-0249 |