Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals
Objective: to analyze the levels of satisfaction, self-confidence, and self-efficacy in clinical simulations among health undergraduates and professionals. Methods: cross-sectional study based on Design Science Research Methodology, with 156 health professionals and 149 health undergraduates who pa...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidade Federal do Ceará
2023-10-01
|
| Series: | Rev Rene |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/91858 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849233195347738624 |
|---|---|
| author | Viviane Christine dos Reis Alves Almeida Jaqueline Costa Lima Gímerson Erick Ferreira João Lucas Campos de Oliveira Jocilene de Carvalho Miraveti Mara Regina Rosa Ribeiro |
| author_facet | Viviane Christine dos Reis Alves Almeida Jaqueline Costa Lima Gímerson Erick Ferreira João Lucas Campos de Oliveira Jocilene de Carvalho Miraveti Mara Regina Rosa Ribeiro |
| author_sort | Viviane Christine dos Reis Alves Almeida |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Objective: to analyze the levels of satisfaction, self-confidence, and self-efficacy in clinical simulations among health undergraduates and professionals. Methods: cross-sectional study based on Design Science Research Methodology, with 156 health professionals and 149 health undergraduates who participated in an educational session about personal protective equipment use during the COVID-19 pandemic, mediated by Rapid-Cycle Deliberate Practice. Participants responded to a social and work-related questionnaire and to validated scales. For descriptive analysis of independent samples, Chi-squared test and Student's t were used considering p<0.05 as significant. Results: we found generally high satisfaction levels (mean ± standard deviation: 4.72±0.58), self-confidence (4.44±0.78), and self-efficacy (4.03±1.17) for favorable items. There were significant statistical differences in seven items in the scale of satisfaction and self-confidence with learning in students, and in six items of the general self-efficacy scale, with p<0.05. Conclusion: undergraduates showed higher means of satisfaction and self-confidence with learning, while professionals had higher means of self-efficacy. These results can collaborate for the continuity of clinical simulation practices, increasing procedural safety and quality. Contributions to practice: the results show that the activities had a positive contribution, increasing learning opportunities and practical experiences that reflect on the excellence of the routine.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8d18ff72370f4311afd934cf6c858f2c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1517-3852 2175-6783 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
| publisher | Universidade Federal do Ceará |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Rev Rene |
| spelling | doaj-art-8d18ff72370f4311afd934cf6c858f2c2025-08-20T12:47:10ZengUniversidade Federal do CearáRev Rene1517-38522175-67832023-10-0124Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionalsViviane Christine dos Reis Alves Almeidahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4680-2346Jaqueline Costa Limahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2264-3301Gímerson Erick Ferreirahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4039-0205João Lucas Campos de Oliveirahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1822-2360Jocilene de Carvalho Miravetihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5432-4890Mara Regina Rosa Ribeirohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7132-3005 Objective: to analyze the levels of satisfaction, self-confidence, and self-efficacy in clinical simulations among health undergraduates and professionals. Methods: cross-sectional study based on Design Science Research Methodology, with 156 health professionals and 149 health undergraduates who participated in an educational session about personal protective equipment use during the COVID-19 pandemic, mediated by Rapid-Cycle Deliberate Practice. Participants responded to a social and work-related questionnaire and to validated scales. For descriptive analysis of independent samples, Chi-squared test and Student's t were used considering p<0.05 as significant. Results: we found generally high satisfaction levels (mean ± standard deviation: 4.72±0.58), self-confidence (4.44±0.78), and self-efficacy (4.03±1.17) for favorable items. There were significant statistical differences in seven items in the scale of satisfaction and self-confidence with learning in students, and in six items of the general self-efficacy scale, with p<0.05. Conclusion: undergraduates showed higher means of satisfaction and self-confidence with learning, while professionals had higher means of self-efficacy. These results can collaborate for the continuity of clinical simulation practices, increasing procedural safety and quality. Contributions to practice: the results show that the activities had a positive contribution, increasing learning opportunities and practical experiences that reflect on the excellence of the routine. https://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/91858Personal Protective Equipment; COVID-19; Simulation Training. |
| spellingShingle | Viviane Christine dos Reis Alves Almeida Jaqueline Costa Lima Gímerson Erick Ferreira João Lucas Campos de Oliveira Jocilene de Carvalho Miraveti Mara Regina Rosa Ribeiro Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals Rev Rene Personal Protective Equipment; COVID-19; Simulation Training. |
| title | Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals |
| title_full | Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals |
| title_fullStr | Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals |
| title_full_unstemmed | Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals |
| title_short | Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals |
| title_sort | satisfaction self confidence and self efficacy in the use of clinical simulations comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals |
| topic | Personal Protective Equipment; COVID-19; Simulation Training. |
| url | https://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/91858 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vivianechristinedosreisalvesalmeida satisfactionselfconfidenceandselfefficacyintheuseofclinicalsimulationscomparisonsbetweenhealthundergraduatesandprofessionals AT jaquelinecostalima satisfactionselfconfidenceandselfefficacyintheuseofclinicalsimulationscomparisonsbetweenhealthundergraduatesandprofessionals AT gimersonerickferreira satisfactionselfconfidenceandselfefficacyintheuseofclinicalsimulationscomparisonsbetweenhealthundergraduatesandprofessionals AT joaolucascamposdeoliveira satisfactionselfconfidenceandselfefficacyintheuseofclinicalsimulationscomparisonsbetweenhealthundergraduatesandprofessionals AT jocilenedecarvalhomiraveti satisfactionselfconfidenceandselfefficacyintheuseofclinicalsimulationscomparisonsbetweenhealthundergraduatesandprofessionals AT marareginarosaribeiro satisfactionselfconfidenceandselfefficacyintheuseofclinicalsimulationscomparisonsbetweenhealthundergraduatesandprofessionals |