Environmental effectiveness of GAEC cross-compliance Standard 2.1 ‘Maintaining the level of soil organic matter through management of stubble and crop residues’ and economic evaluation of the competitiveness gap for farmers

Within the Project MO.NA.CO. the Environmental effectiveness of GAEC cross-compliance Standard 2.2 ‘Maintaining the level of soil organic matter through management of stubble and crop residues’ and economic evaluation of the competitiveness gap for farmers were evaluated. The monitoring was performe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Domenico Ventrella, Nino Virzì, Francesco Intrigliolo, Massimo Palumbo, Michele Cambrea, Alfio Platania, Fabiola Sciacca, Stefania Licciardello, Antonio Troccoli, Mario Russo, Rosa Francaviglia, Ulderico Neri, Margherita Falcucci, Giampiero Simonetti, Olimpia Masetti, Ginaluca Renzi, Marisanna Speroni, Lamberto Borrelli, Giovanni Cabassi, Luigi Degano, Roberto Fuccella, Francesco Savi, Paolo Tagliabue, Marco Fedrizzi, Roberto Fanigliulo, Mauro Pagano, Giulio Sperandio, Mirko Guerrieri, Daniele Puri, Francesco Montemurro, Vittorio Alessandro Vonella, Luisa Giglio, Francesco Fornaro, Mirko Castellini, Rita Leogrande, Carolina Vitti, Marcello Mastrangelo, Angelo Fiore, Mariangela Diacono, Francesca Chiarini, Francesco Fracasso, Erica Sartori, Antonio Barbieri, Francesco Fagotto, Paolo Bazzoffi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2015-12-01
Series:Italian Journal of Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.agronomy.it/index.php/agro/article/view/697
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850263234581364736
author Domenico Ventrella
Nino Virzì
Francesco Intrigliolo
Massimo Palumbo
Michele Cambrea
Alfio Platania
Fabiola Sciacca
Stefania Licciardello
Antonio Troccoli
Mario Russo
Rosa Francaviglia
Ulderico Neri
Margherita Falcucci
Giampiero Simonetti
Olimpia Masetti
Ginaluca Renzi
Marisanna Speroni
Lamberto Borrelli
Giovanni Cabassi
Luigi Degano
Roberto Fuccella
Francesco Savi
Paolo Tagliabue
Marco Fedrizzi
Roberto Fanigliulo
Mauro Pagano
Giulio Sperandio
Mirko Guerrieri
Daniele Puri
Francesco Montemurro
Vittorio Alessandro Vonella
Luisa Giglio
Francesco Fornaro
Mirko Castellini
Rita Leogrande
Carolina Vitti
Marcello Mastrangelo
Angelo Fiore
Mariangela Diacono
Francesca Chiarini
Francesco Fracasso
Erica Sartori
Antonio Barbieri
Francesco Fagotto
Paolo Bazzoffi
author_facet Domenico Ventrella
Nino Virzì
Francesco Intrigliolo
Massimo Palumbo
Michele Cambrea
Alfio Platania
Fabiola Sciacca
Stefania Licciardello
Antonio Troccoli
Mario Russo
Rosa Francaviglia
Ulderico Neri
Margherita Falcucci
Giampiero Simonetti
Olimpia Masetti
Ginaluca Renzi
Marisanna Speroni
Lamberto Borrelli
Giovanni Cabassi
Luigi Degano
Roberto Fuccella
Francesco Savi
Paolo Tagliabue
Marco Fedrizzi
Roberto Fanigliulo
Mauro Pagano
Giulio Sperandio
Mirko Guerrieri
Daniele Puri
Francesco Montemurro
Vittorio Alessandro Vonella
Luisa Giglio
Francesco Fornaro
Mirko Castellini
Rita Leogrande
Carolina Vitti
Marcello Mastrangelo
Angelo Fiore
Mariangela Diacono
Francesca Chiarini
Francesco Fracasso
Erica Sartori
Antonio Barbieri
Francesco Fagotto
Paolo Bazzoffi
author_sort Domenico Ventrella
collection DOAJ
description Within the Project MO.NA.CO. the Environmental effectiveness of GAEC cross-compliance Standard 2.2 ‘Maintaining the level of soil organic matter through management of stubble and crop residues’ and economic evaluation of the competitiveness gap for farmers were evaluated. The monitoring was performed in eight experimental farms of the Council for agricultural research and economics (CREA), distributed throughout Italy and with different soil and climatic conditions. Yield parameters and several components of soil organic matter were evaluated in two contrasting treatments applied to one-year rotation of winter durum wheat and maize: i) incorporation into the soil of crop residues (Factual treatment) and ii) burning or removal of crop residues (Counterfactual treatment). The application of the standard ‘crop residue management’ has showed contrasting results with differences (for yield and soil) between the two treatments resulted almost always non significant. The analysis of economic competitiveness gap showed that the CR incorporation is more expensive than CR burning or removal, but the economic disadvantage can be considered rather small and thus easily compensated by Community aids. Therefore, the soil incorporation of crop residues can be considered a ‘good agricultural practice’ that does not penalize farmers in terms of production and cost and at the same time contributes to the maintenance of fertility and soil biodiversity. On the contrary, the removal and burning of residues result in a low or no-addition of organic matter into the soil. Moreover, burning can contribute to decrease the biodiversity and to increase the risk of air pollution, fires and road accidents.
format Article
id doaj-art-8d0c4879256640c09abc7c19a7b536fd
institution OA Journals
issn 1125-4718
2039-6805
language English
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Italian Journal of Agronomy
spelling doaj-art-8d0c4879256640c09abc7c19a7b536fd2025-08-20T01:55:01ZengElsevierItalian Journal of Agronomy1125-47182039-68052015-12-01101s10.4081/ija.2015.697512Environmental effectiveness of GAEC cross-compliance Standard 2.1 ‘Maintaining the level of soil organic matter through management of stubble and crop residues’ and economic evaluation of the competitiveness gap for farmersDomenico Ventrella0Nino Virzì1Francesco Intrigliolo2Massimo Palumbo3Michele Cambrea4Alfio Platania5Fabiola Sciacca6Stefania Licciardello7Antonio Troccoli8Mario Russo9Rosa Francaviglia10Ulderico Neri11Margherita Falcucci12Giampiero Simonetti13Olimpia Masetti14Ginaluca Renzi15Marisanna Speroni16Lamberto Borrelli17Giovanni Cabassi18Luigi Degano19Roberto Fuccella20Francesco Savi21Paolo Tagliabue22Marco Fedrizzi23Roberto Fanigliulo24Mauro Pagano25Giulio Sperandio26Mirko Guerrieri27Daniele Puri28Francesco Montemurro29Vittorio Alessandro Vonella30Luisa Giglio31Francesco Fornaro32Mirko Castellini33Rita Leogrande34Carolina Vitti35Marcello Mastrangelo36Angelo Fiore37Mariangela Diacono38Francesca Chiarini39Francesco Fracasso40Erica Sartori41Antonio Barbieri42Francesco Fagotto43Paolo Bazzoffi44CREA-SCA, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Unit for Cropping Systems in Dry EnvironmentsCREA-ACM, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for the Citrus crops and the MediterraneanCREA-ACM, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for the Citrus crops and the MediterraneanCREA-ACM, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for the Citrus crops and the MediterraneanCREA-ACM, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for the Citrus crops and the MediterraneanCREA-ACM, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for the Citrus crops and the MediterraneanCREA-ACM, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for the Citrus crops and the MediterraneanCREA-ACM, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for the Citrus crops and the MediterraneanCREA-CER, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Cereal CropsCREA-CER, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Cereal CropsCREA-RPS, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for the Soil-Plant SystemCREA-RPS, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for the Soil-Plant SystemCREA-RPS, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for the Soil-Plant SystemCREA-RPS, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for the Soil-Plant SystemCREA-RPS, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for the Soil-Plant SystemCREA-RPS, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for the Soil-Plant SystemCREA-FLC, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Fodder Crop and Dairy ProductionsCREA-FLC, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Fodder Crop and Dairy ProductionsCREA-FLC, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Fodder Crop and Dairy ProductionsCREA-FLC, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Fodder Crop and Dairy ProductionsCREA-FLC, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Fodder Crop and Dairy ProductionsCREA-FLC, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Fodder Crop and Dairy ProductionsCREA-FLC, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Fodder Crop and Dairy ProductionsCREA-ING, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Unit for Agricultural EngineeringCREA-ING, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Unit for Agricultural EngineeringCREA-ING, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Unit for Agricultural EngineeringCREA-ING, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Unit for Agricultural EngineeringCREA-ING, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Unit for Agricultural EngineeringCREA-ING, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Unit for Agricultural EngineeringCREA-SCA, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Unit for Cropping Systems in Dry EnvironmentsCREA-SCA, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Unit for Cropping Systems in Dry EnvironmentsCREA-SCA, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Unit for Cropping Systems in Dry EnvironmentsCREA-SCA, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Unit for Cropping Systems in Dry EnvironmentsCREA-SCA, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Unit for Cropping Systems in Dry EnvironmentsCREA-SCA, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Unit for Cropping Systems in Dry EnvironmentsCREA-SCA, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Unit for Cropping Systems in Dry EnvironmentsCREA-SCA, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Unit for Cropping Systems in Dry EnvironmentsCREA-SCA, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Unit for Cropping Systems in Dry EnvironmentsVeneto Agricoltura, Regional Agency for the agricultural, forestry and agri-food sectorVeneto Agricoltura, Regional Agency for the agricultural, forestry and agri-food sectorVeneto Agricoltura, Regional Agency for the agricultural, forestry and agri-food sectorVeneto Agricoltura, Regional Agency for the agricultural, forestry and agri-food sectorVeneto Agricoltura, Azienda Regionale per i settori Agricolo, Forestale e Agro-AlimentareVeneto Agricoltura, Regional Agency for the agricultural, forestry and agri-food sectorCREA-ABP, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Agrobiology and PedologyWithin the Project MO.NA.CO. the Environmental effectiveness of GAEC cross-compliance Standard 2.2 ‘Maintaining the level of soil organic matter through management of stubble and crop residues’ and economic evaluation of the competitiveness gap for farmers were evaluated. The monitoring was performed in eight experimental farms of the Council for agricultural research and economics (CREA), distributed throughout Italy and with different soil and climatic conditions. Yield parameters and several components of soil organic matter were evaluated in two contrasting treatments applied to one-year rotation of winter durum wheat and maize: i) incorporation into the soil of crop residues (Factual treatment) and ii) burning or removal of crop residues (Counterfactual treatment). The application of the standard ‘crop residue management’ has showed contrasting results with differences (for yield and soil) between the two treatments resulted almost always non significant. The analysis of economic competitiveness gap showed that the CR incorporation is more expensive than CR burning or removal, but the economic disadvantage can be considered rather small and thus easily compensated by Community aids. Therefore, the soil incorporation of crop residues can be considered a ‘good agricultural practice’ that does not penalize farmers in terms of production and cost and at the same time contributes to the maintenance of fertility and soil biodiversity. On the contrary, the removal and burning of residues result in a low or no-addition of organic matter into the soil. Moreover, burning can contribute to decrease the biodiversity and to increase the risk of air pollution, fires and road accidents.https://www.agronomy.it/index.php/agro/article/view/697Cross-compliancerural developmentstandard 2.1stubble and crop residues managementcompetitiveness.
spellingShingle Domenico Ventrella
Nino Virzì
Francesco Intrigliolo
Massimo Palumbo
Michele Cambrea
Alfio Platania
Fabiola Sciacca
Stefania Licciardello
Antonio Troccoli
Mario Russo
Rosa Francaviglia
Ulderico Neri
Margherita Falcucci
Giampiero Simonetti
Olimpia Masetti
Ginaluca Renzi
Marisanna Speroni
Lamberto Borrelli
Giovanni Cabassi
Luigi Degano
Roberto Fuccella
Francesco Savi
Paolo Tagliabue
Marco Fedrizzi
Roberto Fanigliulo
Mauro Pagano
Giulio Sperandio
Mirko Guerrieri
Daniele Puri
Francesco Montemurro
Vittorio Alessandro Vonella
Luisa Giglio
Francesco Fornaro
Mirko Castellini
Rita Leogrande
Carolina Vitti
Marcello Mastrangelo
Angelo Fiore
Mariangela Diacono
Francesca Chiarini
Francesco Fracasso
Erica Sartori
Antonio Barbieri
Francesco Fagotto
Paolo Bazzoffi
Environmental effectiveness of GAEC cross-compliance Standard 2.1 ‘Maintaining the level of soil organic matter through management of stubble and crop residues’ and economic evaluation of the competitiveness gap for farmers
Italian Journal of Agronomy
Cross-compliance
rural development
standard 2.1
stubble and crop residues management
competitiveness.
title Environmental effectiveness of GAEC cross-compliance Standard 2.1 ‘Maintaining the level of soil organic matter through management of stubble and crop residues’ and economic evaluation of the competitiveness gap for farmers
title_full Environmental effectiveness of GAEC cross-compliance Standard 2.1 ‘Maintaining the level of soil organic matter through management of stubble and crop residues’ and economic evaluation of the competitiveness gap for farmers
title_fullStr Environmental effectiveness of GAEC cross-compliance Standard 2.1 ‘Maintaining the level of soil organic matter through management of stubble and crop residues’ and economic evaluation of the competitiveness gap for farmers
title_full_unstemmed Environmental effectiveness of GAEC cross-compliance Standard 2.1 ‘Maintaining the level of soil organic matter through management of stubble and crop residues’ and economic evaluation of the competitiveness gap for farmers
title_short Environmental effectiveness of GAEC cross-compliance Standard 2.1 ‘Maintaining the level of soil organic matter through management of stubble and crop residues’ and economic evaluation of the competitiveness gap for farmers
title_sort environmental effectiveness of gaec cross compliance standard 2 1 maintaining the level of soil organic matter through management of stubble and crop residues and economic evaluation of the competitiveness gap for farmers
topic Cross-compliance
rural development
standard 2.1
stubble and crop residues management
competitiveness.
url https://www.agronomy.it/index.php/agro/article/view/697
work_keys_str_mv AT domenicoventrella environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT ninovirzi environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT francescointrigliolo environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT massimopalumbo environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT michelecambrea environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT alfioplatania environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT fabiolasciacca environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT stefanialicciardello environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT antoniotroccoli environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT mariorusso environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT rosafrancaviglia environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT uldericoneri environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT margheritafalcucci environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT giampierosimonetti environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT olimpiamasetti environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT ginalucarenzi environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT marisannasperoni environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT lambertoborrelli environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT giovannicabassi environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT luigidegano environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT robertofuccella environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT francescosavi environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT paolotagliabue environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT marcofedrizzi environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT robertofanigliulo environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT mauropagano environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT giuliosperandio environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT mirkoguerrieri environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT danielepuri environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT francescomontemurro environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT vittorioalessandrovonella environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT luisagiglio environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT francescofornaro environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT mirkocastellini environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT ritaleogrande environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT carolinavitti environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT marcellomastrangelo environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT angelofiore environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT mariangeladiacono environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT francescachiarini environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT francescofracasso environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT ericasartori environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT antoniobarbieri environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT francescofagotto environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers
AT paolobazzoffi environmentaleffectivenessofgaeccrosscompliancestandard21maintainingthelevelofsoilorganicmatterthroughmanagementofstubbleandcropresiduesandeconomicevaluationofthecompetitivenessgapforfarmers