Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey
Objectives To develop effective interventions to prevent publishing in presumed predatory journals (ie, journals that display deceptive characteristics, markers or data that cannot be verified), it is helpful to understand the motivations and experiences of those who have published in these journals...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | David Moher, Agnes Grudniewicz, Kelly D Cobey, Manoj M Lalu, Danielle B Rice, Hana Raffoul |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019-03-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/3/e026516.full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Stinging predatory journals: a brief overview and recommendations
by: Adam Larson, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
How do predatory medical journals try to seduce and fool potential authors?: Analysis of an 18-months monitoring survey
by: van Loon Olaf R., et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Migrate, Publish, Repeat: TEI Journals in the Open Journal Systems Platform
by: Nicholas Homenda, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01) -
List of Papers Published in “Energetika” Journal, 2021
by: article editotial
Published: (2021-12-01) -
Recommendations and guidelines for creating scholarly biomedical journals: A scoping review.
by: Jeremy Y Ng, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)