Impact of plasticization temperature on the mechanical properties of sports mouthguards

Objective: Mouthguards can reduce or even prevent orofacial injuries. These devices are responsible for absorbing part of the energy of an impact force, while the remaining part is dissipated. The present study aimed to evaluate how the plasticization temperature of the sports mouthguards’ manufact...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ester Stephany Rodrigues da Silva, Thales Ribeiro de Magalhães Filho, Simone Saldanha Ignácio de Oliveira, Karin de Mello Weig, Luise Gomes da Motta, Juliana Nunes da Silva Meirelles Dória Maia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual Paulista 2024-09-01
Series:Brazilian Dental Science
Online Access:https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/4357
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: Mouthguards can reduce or even prevent orofacial injuries. These devices are responsible for absorbing part of the energy of an impact force, while the remaining part is dissipated. The present study aimed to evaluate how the plasticization temperature of the sports mouthguards’ manufacturing process influences their mechanical properties and protective potential. Material and Methods: Specimens were made according to different plasticization temperatures (85°C, 103°C, 121°C and 128°C) and different dental brands of EVA sheets (Bio-art and FGM). Plasticization temperatures were measured using a culinary thermometer (Term; TP300). The mechanical properties evaluated were: energy absorption capacity, deformation, and modulus of elasticity. Compression testing was carried out in the Emic universal testing machine with a speed of 600 mm/min to simulate a punch. Results: EVA sheets submitted to the highest temperatures (121°C and 128°C) had their energy absorption capacity reduced. In addition, the samples that plasticized at the lowest temperature (85°C) showed higher absorption capacity, lower elastic modulus, and less variation in its dimensions. It proved to be the most effective in protection and with greater durability. Conclusion: The plasticization temperature proved to be an influential factor in the absorption capacity of mouthguards, so the increase in temperature led to a reduction in this property, especially when higher than 120°C. In addition, the plasticization temperature may vary depending on the sheet brand used. Finally, the kitchen thermometer used proved to be efficient and practical, thanks to its easy-to-read display and wide availability on the market. KEYWORDS Modulus of elasticity; Mouthguards; Physicochemical absorption; Polyethylene vinyl acetate; Temperature.
ISSN:2178-6011