Comparative Endothelialization of the Watchman Plug Device and LACBES Pacifier Occluder after Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Background: For patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to oral anticoagulants (OACs). However, incomplete device endothelialization (IDE) after LAAC has been linked to device-related thrombus (DRT) and subsequen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jing Zhou, Zongqi Zhang, Kandi Zhang, Tiantian Zhang, Qing He, Junfeng Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IMR Press 2024-12-01
Series:Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.imrpress.com/journal/RCM/25/12/10.31083/j.rcm2512450
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850058212288495616
author Jing Zhou
Zongqi Zhang
Kandi Zhang
Tiantian Zhang
Qing He
Junfeng Zhang
author_facet Jing Zhou
Zongqi Zhang
Kandi Zhang
Tiantian Zhang
Qing He
Junfeng Zhang
author_sort Jing Zhou
collection DOAJ
description Background: For patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to oral anticoagulants (OACs). However, incomplete device endothelialization (IDE) after LAAC has been linked to device-related thrombus (DRT) and subsequent thromboembolic events. Here, the differences in device endothelialization between the Watchman plug device and the LACBES pacifier occluder after implantation were investigated. Methods: Of 201 consecutive patients with indications for LAAC, 101 received a Watchman 2.5 device, and 100 received a LACBES occluder. IDE was defined as a residual flow of contrast agent inside the left atrial appendage (LAA) on cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) without peri-device leak (PDL) at the 3-month and 6-month follow-ups. Results: There were no significant differences in DRT or PDL incidence between the two groups. However, the IDE rate in the absence of PDL was higher in the LACBES group than in the Watchman group at 3 months (42.4% versus 25.8%; p = 0.025) and at the 6-month follow-up (24.7% versus 11.2%; p = 0.028) as determined by CCTA. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that the LACBES occluder took longer to complete endothelialization than the Watchman device after successful LAAC therapy. CCTA is a reliable imaging method for assessing the sealing of LAAC devices and confirming complete device endothelialization.
format Article
id doaj-art-8cf881df302c473cbbead4a50b2cc39d
institution DOAJ
issn 1530-6550
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher IMR Press
record_format Article
series Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj-art-8cf881df302c473cbbead4a50b2cc39d2025-08-20T02:51:14ZengIMR PressReviews in Cardiovascular Medicine1530-65502024-12-01251245010.31083/j.rcm2512450S1530-6550(24)01604-1Comparative Endothelialization of the Watchman Plug Device and LACBES Pacifier Occluder after Left Atrial Appendage ClosureJing Zhou0Zongqi Zhang1Kandi Zhang2Tiantian Zhang3Qing He4Junfeng Zhang5Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200011 Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200011 Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200011 Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200011 Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200011 Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200011 Shanghai, ChinaBackground: For patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to oral anticoagulants (OACs). However, incomplete device endothelialization (IDE) after LAAC has been linked to device-related thrombus (DRT) and subsequent thromboembolic events. Here, the differences in device endothelialization between the Watchman plug device and the LACBES pacifier occluder after implantation were investigated. Methods: Of 201 consecutive patients with indications for LAAC, 101 received a Watchman 2.5 device, and 100 received a LACBES occluder. IDE was defined as a residual flow of contrast agent inside the left atrial appendage (LAA) on cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) without peri-device leak (PDL) at the 3-month and 6-month follow-ups. Results: There were no significant differences in DRT or PDL incidence between the two groups. However, the IDE rate in the absence of PDL was higher in the LACBES group than in the Watchman group at 3 months (42.4% versus 25.8%; p = 0.025) and at the 6-month follow-up (24.7% versus 11.2%; p = 0.028) as determined by CCTA. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that the LACBES occluder took longer to complete endothelialization than the Watchman device after successful LAAC therapy. CCTA is a reliable imaging method for assessing the sealing of LAAC devices and confirming complete device endothelialization.https://www.imrpress.com/journal/RCM/25/12/10.31083/j.rcm2512450nonvalvular atrial fibrillationleft atrial appendage closureendothelializationcardiac computed tomography angiography
spellingShingle Jing Zhou
Zongqi Zhang
Kandi Zhang
Tiantian Zhang
Qing He
Junfeng Zhang
Comparative Endothelialization of the Watchman Plug Device and LACBES Pacifier Occluder after Left Atrial Appendage Closure
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
left atrial appendage closure
endothelialization
cardiac computed tomography angiography
title Comparative Endothelialization of the Watchman Plug Device and LACBES Pacifier Occluder after Left Atrial Appendage Closure
title_full Comparative Endothelialization of the Watchman Plug Device and LACBES Pacifier Occluder after Left Atrial Appendage Closure
title_fullStr Comparative Endothelialization of the Watchman Plug Device and LACBES Pacifier Occluder after Left Atrial Appendage Closure
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Endothelialization of the Watchman Plug Device and LACBES Pacifier Occluder after Left Atrial Appendage Closure
title_short Comparative Endothelialization of the Watchman Plug Device and LACBES Pacifier Occluder after Left Atrial Appendage Closure
title_sort comparative endothelialization of the watchman plug device and lacbes pacifier occluder after left atrial appendage closure
topic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
left atrial appendage closure
endothelialization
cardiac computed tomography angiography
url https://www.imrpress.com/journal/RCM/25/12/10.31083/j.rcm2512450
work_keys_str_mv AT jingzhou comparativeendothelializationofthewatchmanplugdeviceandlacbespacifieroccluderafterleftatrialappendageclosure
AT zongqizhang comparativeendothelializationofthewatchmanplugdeviceandlacbespacifieroccluderafterleftatrialappendageclosure
AT kandizhang comparativeendothelializationofthewatchmanplugdeviceandlacbespacifieroccluderafterleftatrialappendageclosure
AT tiantianzhang comparativeendothelializationofthewatchmanplugdeviceandlacbespacifieroccluderafterleftatrialappendageclosure
AT qinghe comparativeendothelializationofthewatchmanplugdeviceandlacbespacifieroccluderafterleftatrialappendageclosure
AT junfengzhang comparativeendothelializationofthewatchmanplugdeviceandlacbespacifieroccluderafterleftatrialappendageclosure