Tendințe în cercetarea RAM: O perspectivă bibliometrică asupra păsărilor domestice vs. sălbatice (2015–2025)
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Enterobacteriaceae remains a critical challenge for both public and veterinary health, driven by intensive antibiotic use in poultry production and the natural dissemination of resistant bacteria via wildlife. This study aimed to perform a comparative bibliometric a...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Asociaţia Naţională a Fabricanţilor de Produse de Uz Veterinar
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Medicamentul Veterinar |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://veterinarypharmacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/2025_VD_191_ART.2.ROM_.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Enterobacteriaceae remains a critical challenge for both public and veterinary health, driven by intensive antibiotic use in poultry production and the natural dissemination of resistant bacteria via wildlife. This study aimed to perform a comparative bibliometric analysis of scientific literature on AMR in domestic (poultry) and wild birds, using PubMed data from 2015 to 2025. The results revealed a markedly higher number of publications focusing on poultry, predominantly from Asia and
Western Europe. In contrast, studies on wild birds were fewer but exhibited greater methodological diversity, incorporating advanced techniques such as metagenomics and 16S rRNA sequencing. MeSH
term analysis highlighted thematic differences: poultry-related articles emphasized zoonotic risks and food production, whereas studies on wild birds focused on ecological surveillance. These findings underscore the need to integrate wild birds into AMR monitoring frameworks as part of a holistic One Health approach. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1843-9527 2069-2463 |