Słownictwo politycznych tożsamości w aktach sejmików koronnych z lat 1572–1691

The article focuses on vocabulary related to political identity of the Polish Crown’s nobility in sejmik acts. These sources often mention identities related to particular territories, the larger whole (the Commonwealth, ojczyzna – “fatherland”,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Szymon Rutkowski
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Jagiellonian University 2024-10-01
Series:Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa
Online Access: https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/kshpp/artykul/slownictwo-politycznych-tozsamosci-w-aktach-sejmikow-koronnych-z-lat-1572-1691
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850108937750183936
author Szymon Rutkowski
author_facet Szymon Rutkowski
author_sort Szymon Rutkowski
collection DOAJ
description The article focuses on vocabulary related to political identity of the Polish Crown’s nobility in sejmik acts. These sources often mention identities related to particular territories, the larger whole (the Commonwealth, ojczyzna – “fatherland”, korona – “the Crown”) and one’s legal estate, while religious and ethnic identities are fairly rarely referenced. The linguistic changes are presented through consecutive 40-year divisions of the time frame under study. In the period until 1611 the word korona, as well as terms related to abstract political ideals, appear more often compared to subsequent decades. With time, references to local identities increasingly dominate mentions of the larger ones. The period 1612–1651 is a time of increased attention to the ojczyzna and signs of civic mobilization. The period after 1651 confirms the domination of the word rzeczpospolita over ojczyzna and korona, as well as a focus on bureaucratic functions and military survival of the polity. Word collocations serve as evidence to criticize anachronistic understanding of terms related to country identity in modern times (kraj, państwo, naród – “nation”, which contrary to popular depictions of the period signifies person’s descent more than any sovereign whole). The study shows the array of identity-related terms of the Commonwealth as a system of interrelated concepts, coalescing around the vision of political gathering of palatinates (at the sejm) and the citizens-brethren.
format Article
id doaj-art-8cdc94817d81419d9fe206dfa16ef4d0
institution OA Journals
issn 2084-4115
2084-4131
language deu
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher Jagiellonian University
record_format Article
series Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa
spelling doaj-art-8cdc94817d81419d9fe206dfa16ef4d02025-08-20T02:38:14ZdeuJagiellonian UniversityKrakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa2084-41152084-41312024-10-01Tom 17 (2024)214717810.4467/20844131KS.24.013.20286Słownictwo politycznych tożsamości w aktach sejmików koronnych z lat 1572–1691Szymon Rutkowskihttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6148-502X The article focuses on vocabulary related to political identity of the Polish Crown’s nobility in sejmik acts. These sources often mention identities related to particular territories, the larger whole (the Commonwealth, ojczyzna – “fatherland”, korona – “the Crown”) and one’s legal estate, while religious and ethnic identities are fairly rarely referenced. The linguistic changes are presented through consecutive 40-year divisions of the time frame under study. In the period until 1611 the word korona, as well as terms related to abstract political ideals, appear more often compared to subsequent decades. With time, references to local identities increasingly dominate mentions of the larger ones. The period 1612–1651 is a time of increased attention to the ojczyzna and signs of civic mobilization. The period after 1651 confirms the domination of the word rzeczpospolita over ojczyzna and korona, as well as a focus on bureaucratic functions and military survival of the polity. Word collocations serve as evidence to criticize anachronistic understanding of terms related to country identity in modern times (kraj, państwo, naród – “nation”, which contrary to popular depictions of the period signifies person’s descent more than any sovereign whole). The study shows the array of identity-related terms of the Commonwealth as a system of interrelated concepts, coalescing around the vision of political gathering of palatinates (at the sejm) and the citizens-brethren. https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/kshpp/artykul/slownictwo-politycznych-tozsamosci-w-aktach-sejmikow-koronnych-z-lat-1572-1691
spellingShingle Szymon Rutkowski
Słownictwo politycznych tożsamości w aktach sejmików koronnych z lat 1572–1691
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa
title Słownictwo politycznych tożsamości w aktach sejmików koronnych z lat 1572–1691
title_full Słownictwo politycznych tożsamości w aktach sejmików koronnych z lat 1572–1691
title_fullStr Słownictwo politycznych tożsamości w aktach sejmików koronnych z lat 1572–1691
title_full_unstemmed Słownictwo politycznych tożsamości w aktach sejmików koronnych z lat 1572–1691
title_short Słownictwo politycznych tożsamości w aktach sejmików koronnych z lat 1572–1691
title_sort slownictwo politycznych tozsamosci w aktach sejmikow koronnych z lat 1572 1691
url https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/kshpp/artykul/slownictwo-politycznych-tozsamosci-w-aktach-sejmikow-koronnych-z-lat-1572-1691
work_keys_str_mv AT szymonrutkowski słownictwopolitycznychtozsamosciwaktachsejmikowkoronnychzlat15721691