Comparison of the Methods for Diagnosing the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Background. Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common and widespread peripheral neuropathy in the world. The diagnostic testing methods for the carpal tunnel syndrome are based on anamnesis data, objective and instrumental inspection. Electroneuromyography is the main instrumental test when carpal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aurimas Dobilinskas, Saulius Knystautas, Kęstutis Braziulis, Irmantas Rutkauskas, Loreta Pilipaitytė
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius University Press 2023-11-01
Series:Lietuvos Chirurgija
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journals.vu.lt/lietuvos-chirurgija/article/view/33730
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832593277342187520
author Aurimas Dobilinskas
Saulius Knystautas
Kęstutis Braziulis
Irmantas Rutkauskas
Loreta Pilipaitytė
author_facet Aurimas Dobilinskas
Saulius Knystautas
Kęstutis Braziulis
Irmantas Rutkauskas
Loreta Pilipaitytė
author_sort Aurimas Dobilinskas
collection DOAJ
description Background. Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common and widespread peripheral neuropathy in the world. The diagnostic testing methods for the carpal tunnel syndrome are based on anamnesis data, objective and instrumental inspection. Electroneuromyography is the main instrumental test when carpal tunnel syndrome is suspected. An ultrasound imaging may also be performed. Objective. To determine the effectiveness, sensitivity and specificity of instrumental diagnostics methods used to diagnose the carpal tunnel syndrome, and to compare them. Methods. Diagnostic testing – ultrasound and electroneuromyography was applied to persons under study. The area of the median nerve (mm2) was assessed during the ultrasound examination. The results of the electroneuromyography study evaluated the response speed of the sensory impulse (ms), the speed of the motor impulse response (ms). Later, the tests, their sensitivity and specificity were evaluated and compared. Results. 30 patients participated in the study, of which 26 (86.7%) were women, 4 (13.3%) were men. Electroneuromyography was found to be both sensitive and specific for a measure of sensory propagation velocity, 76.2 and 75%, respectively (p = 0.042); of motor propagation speed – 100 and 75% (p = 0.040). Ultrasonography is sensitive (87.5%) but nonspecific (66.7%) (p = 0.008). The study showed that the ultrasound dimension strongly, directly and reliably correlates with the sensory impulse response rate (p < 0.001), and the ultrasound dimension moderately, directly and reliably correlates with the motor impulse response rate (p < 0.001). Conclusions. Carpal tunnel syndrome can be suspected by ultrasound measurement of the area of the median nerve, but the test is only sensitive but non-specific. Electroneuromyography can confirm the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome, as the test is both sensitive and specific. Comparing the studies, a strong, direct and reliable relationship between the results of the ultrasound and the electroneuromyography testing was established.
format Article
id doaj-art-8cb634ad752749e1a249a798a2805ab1
institution Kabale University
issn 1392-0995
1648-9942
language English
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Vilnius University Press
record_format Article
series Lietuvos Chirurgija
spelling doaj-art-8cb634ad752749e1a249a798a2805ab12025-01-20T18:14:29ZengVilnius University PressLietuvos Chirurgija1392-09951648-99422023-11-0122410.15388/LietChirur.2023.22(4).4Comparison of the Methods for Diagnosing the Carpal Tunnel SyndromeAurimas Dobilinskas0Saulius Knystautas1Kęstutis Braziulis2Irmantas Rutkauskas3Loreta Pilipaitytė4Lithuanian University of Health SciencesLithuanian University of Health SciencesLithuanian University of Health SciencesLithuanian University of Health SciencesLithuanian University of Health Sciences Background. Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common and widespread peripheral neuropathy in the world. The diagnostic testing methods for the carpal tunnel syndrome are based on anamnesis data, objective and instrumental inspection. Electroneuromyography is the main instrumental test when carpal tunnel syndrome is suspected. An ultrasound imaging may also be performed. Objective. To determine the effectiveness, sensitivity and specificity of instrumental diagnostics methods used to diagnose the carpal tunnel syndrome, and to compare them. Methods. Diagnostic testing – ultrasound and electroneuromyography was applied to persons under study. The area of the median nerve (mm2) was assessed during the ultrasound examination. The results of the electroneuromyography study evaluated the response speed of the sensory impulse (ms), the speed of the motor impulse response (ms). Later, the tests, their sensitivity and specificity were evaluated and compared. Results. 30 patients participated in the study, of which 26 (86.7%) were women, 4 (13.3%) were men. Electroneuromyography was found to be both sensitive and specific for a measure of sensory propagation velocity, 76.2 and 75%, respectively (p = 0.042); of motor propagation speed – 100 and 75% (p = 0.040). Ultrasonography is sensitive (87.5%) but nonspecific (66.7%) (p = 0.008). The study showed that the ultrasound dimension strongly, directly and reliably correlates with the sensory impulse response rate (p < 0.001), and the ultrasound dimension moderately, directly and reliably correlates with the motor impulse response rate (p < 0.001). Conclusions. Carpal tunnel syndrome can be suspected by ultrasound measurement of the area of the median nerve, but the test is only sensitive but non-specific. Electroneuromyography can confirm the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome, as the test is both sensitive and specific. Comparing the studies, a strong, direct and reliable relationship between the results of the ultrasound and the electroneuromyography testing was established. https://www.journals.vu.lt/lietuvos-chirurgija/article/view/33730carpal tunnel syndromeultrasound examinationelectroneuromyography
spellingShingle Aurimas Dobilinskas
Saulius Knystautas
Kęstutis Braziulis
Irmantas Rutkauskas
Loreta Pilipaitytė
Comparison of the Methods for Diagnosing the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Lietuvos Chirurgija
carpal tunnel syndrome
ultrasound examination
electroneuromyography
title Comparison of the Methods for Diagnosing the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
title_full Comparison of the Methods for Diagnosing the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
title_fullStr Comparison of the Methods for Diagnosing the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Methods for Diagnosing the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
title_short Comparison of the Methods for Diagnosing the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
title_sort comparison of the methods for diagnosing the carpal tunnel syndrome
topic carpal tunnel syndrome
ultrasound examination
electroneuromyography
url https://www.journals.vu.lt/lietuvos-chirurgija/article/view/33730
work_keys_str_mv AT aurimasdobilinskas comparisonofthemethodsfordiagnosingthecarpaltunnelsyndrome
AT sauliusknystautas comparisonofthemethodsfordiagnosingthecarpaltunnelsyndrome
AT kestutisbraziulis comparisonofthemethodsfordiagnosingthecarpaltunnelsyndrome
AT irmantasrutkauskas comparisonofthemethodsfordiagnosingthecarpaltunnelsyndrome
AT loretapilipaityte comparisonofthemethodsfordiagnosingthecarpaltunnelsyndrome