Perceptions of ICU Care Following Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: A Military Perspective

Objectives:. Although do-not-resuscitate orders only prohibit cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the case of cardiac arrest, the common initiation of this code status in the context of end-of-life care may lead providers to draw premature conclusions about other goals of care. The aim of this study is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sydney E. Dishman, BS, Kathryn E. Driggers, MD, Laura S. Johnson, MD, FACS, Cara H. Olsen, MS, DrPH, Andrea B. Ryan, RN, MSN, Melissa M. McLawhorn, RN, BSN, Kevin K. Chung, MD, FCCM
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2020-07-01
Series:Critical Care Explorations
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000153
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850229596345073664
author Sydney E. Dishman, BS
Kathryn E. Driggers, MD
Laura S. Johnson, MD, FACS
Cara H. Olsen, MS, DrPH
Andrea B. Ryan, RN, MSN
Melissa M. McLawhorn, RN, BSN
Kevin K. Chung, MD, FCCM
author_facet Sydney E. Dishman, BS
Kathryn E. Driggers, MD
Laura S. Johnson, MD, FACS
Cara H. Olsen, MS, DrPH
Andrea B. Ryan, RN, MSN
Melissa M. McLawhorn, RN, BSN
Kevin K. Chung, MD, FCCM
author_sort Sydney E. Dishman, BS
collection DOAJ
description Objectives:. Although do-not-resuscitate orders only prohibit cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the case of cardiac arrest, the common initiation of this code status in the context of end-of-life care may lead providers to draw premature conclusions about other goals of care. The aim of this study is to identify concerns regarding care quality in the setting of do-not-resuscitate orders within the Department of Defense and compare differences in perceptions between members of the critical care team. Design:. A cross sectional observational study was conducted. Setting:. This study took place in the setting of critical care within the Department of Defense. Subjects:. All members of the Uniformed Services Section of the Society of Critical Care Medicine were invited to participate. Interventions:. A validated 31-question survey exploring the perceptions of care quality in the setting of do-not-resuscitate status was distributed. Measurements and Main Results:. Exploratory factor analysis was used to categorically group survey questions, and average factor scores were compared between respondent groups using t tests. Responses to individual questions were also analyzed between comparison groups using Fisher exact tests. Factor analysis revealed no significant differences between respondents of different training backgrounds; however, those with do-not-resuscitate training were more likely to agree that active treatment would be pursued (p = 0.024) and that trust and communication would be maintained (p = 0.005). Although 38% of all respondents worry that quality of care will decrease, 93% agree that life-prolonging treatments should be offered. About a third of providers wrongly believed that a do-not-resuscitate order must be reversed prior to an operation. Conclusions:. Although providers across training backgrounds held similar concerns about decreased care quality in the ICU, there is wide belief that the routine and noninvasive interventions are offered as indicated. Those with do-not-resuscitate training were more likely to believe that standards of care continued to be met after code status change.
format Article
id doaj-art-8c8a36f2baa34ffe94d8586ea4de51e2
institution OA Journals
issn 2639-8028
language English
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Critical Care Explorations
spelling doaj-art-8c8a36f2baa34ffe94d8586ea4de51e22025-08-20T02:04:09ZengWolters KluwerCritical Care Explorations2639-80282020-07-0127e015310.1097/CCE.0000000000000153202007000-00013Perceptions of ICU Care Following Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: A Military PerspectiveSydney E. Dishman, BS0Kathryn E. Driggers, MD1Laura S. Johnson, MD, FACS2Cara H. Olsen, MS, DrPH3Andrea B. Ryan, RN, MSN4Melissa M. McLawhorn, RN, BSN5Kevin K. Chung, MD, FCCM61 Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.2 Department of Internal Medicine, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD.3 Burn/Trauma Section, Department of Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine & The Burn Center, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.4 Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.5 Quality and Outcomes Department, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.6 Firefighters’ Burn and Surgical Research Laboratory, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC.7 Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.Objectives:. Although do-not-resuscitate orders only prohibit cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the case of cardiac arrest, the common initiation of this code status in the context of end-of-life care may lead providers to draw premature conclusions about other goals of care. The aim of this study is to identify concerns regarding care quality in the setting of do-not-resuscitate orders within the Department of Defense and compare differences in perceptions between members of the critical care team. Design:. A cross sectional observational study was conducted. Setting:. This study took place in the setting of critical care within the Department of Defense. Subjects:. All members of the Uniformed Services Section of the Society of Critical Care Medicine were invited to participate. Interventions:. A validated 31-question survey exploring the perceptions of care quality in the setting of do-not-resuscitate status was distributed. Measurements and Main Results:. Exploratory factor analysis was used to categorically group survey questions, and average factor scores were compared between respondent groups using t tests. Responses to individual questions were also analyzed between comparison groups using Fisher exact tests. Factor analysis revealed no significant differences between respondents of different training backgrounds; however, those with do-not-resuscitate training were more likely to agree that active treatment would be pursued (p = 0.024) and that trust and communication would be maintained (p = 0.005). Although 38% of all respondents worry that quality of care will decrease, 93% agree that life-prolonging treatments should be offered. About a third of providers wrongly believed that a do-not-resuscitate order must be reversed prior to an operation. Conclusions:. Although providers across training backgrounds held similar concerns about decreased care quality in the ICU, there is wide belief that the routine and noninvasive interventions are offered as indicated. Those with do-not-resuscitate training were more likely to believe that standards of care continued to be met after code status change.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000153
spellingShingle Sydney E. Dishman, BS
Kathryn E. Driggers, MD
Laura S. Johnson, MD, FACS
Cara H. Olsen, MS, DrPH
Andrea B. Ryan, RN, MSN
Melissa M. McLawhorn, RN, BSN
Kevin K. Chung, MD, FCCM
Perceptions of ICU Care Following Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: A Military Perspective
Critical Care Explorations
title Perceptions of ICU Care Following Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: A Military Perspective
title_full Perceptions of ICU Care Following Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: A Military Perspective
title_fullStr Perceptions of ICU Care Following Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: A Military Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions of ICU Care Following Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: A Military Perspective
title_short Perceptions of ICU Care Following Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: A Military Perspective
title_sort perceptions of icu care following do not resuscitate orders a military perspective
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000153
work_keys_str_mv AT sydneyedishmanbs perceptionsoficucarefollowingdonotresuscitateordersamilitaryperspective
AT kathrynedriggersmd perceptionsoficucarefollowingdonotresuscitateordersamilitaryperspective
AT laurasjohnsonmdfacs perceptionsoficucarefollowingdonotresuscitateordersamilitaryperspective
AT caraholsenmsdrph perceptionsoficucarefollowingdonotresuscitateordersamilitaryperspective
AT andreabryanrnmsn perceptionsoficucarefollowingdonotresuscitateordersamilitaryperspective
AT melissammclawhornrnbsn perceptionsoficucarefollowingdonotresuscitateordersamilitaryperspective
AT kevinkchungmdfccm perceptionsoficucarefollowingdonotresuscitateordersamilitaryperspective