Fruit Quality Evaluation and Optimal Selection of 16 Lines of Feijoa (Acca sellowiana)

In order to comprehensively evaluate the difference in fruit quality among 16 different feijoa lines, this study determined the external and internal quality indicators and antioxidant activities of 16 feijoa lines. Variability analysis, correlation analysis and principal component analysis were use...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: YANG Shiqi, LIU Yumin, LIU Yamin, LI Ju, LI Chengxiang, GAO Bingli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: China Food Publishing Company 2025-05-01
Series:Shipin Kexue
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.spkx.net.cn/fileup/1002-6630/PDF/2025-46-10-004.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849470553288605696
author YANG Shiqi, LIU Yumin, LIU Yamin, LI Ju, LI Chengxiang, GAO Bingli
author_facet YANG Shiqi, LIU Yumin, LIU Yamin, LI Ju, LI Chengxiang, GAO Bingli
author_sort YANG Shiqi, LIU Yumin, LIU Yamin, LI Ju, LI Chengxiang, GAO Bingli
collection DOAJ
description In order to comprehensively evaluate the difference in fruit quality among 16 different feijoa lines, this study determined the external and internal quality indicators and antioxidant activities of 16 feijoa lines. Variability analysis, correlation analysis and principal component analysis were used to identify core indicators. The weights of these indicators were determined by analytic hierarchy process, and a comprehensive evaluation model for fruit quality was established by grey relational analysis. The accuracy of the model was verified by sensory evaluation. The results indicated a significant variation in fruit quality across feijoa lines. Four core fruit quality indexes were selected, including single fruit mass (X1), juice yield (X2), sugar/acid ratio (X3), and total phenol content (X4). The comprehensive evaluation model was described as follows: weighted grey relational grade = 0.381 0X1 + 0.298 2X2 + 0.210 8X3 + 0.110 0X4. The model results were correlated well with those of sensory evaluation (R2 = 0.869), indicating high accuracy of the model. Two excellent lines, Y4 and Y1, were selected for promotion. The findings provide a reference for the establishment of a comprehensive evaluation system for feijoa quality and offer scientific guidance for feijoa breeding.
format Article
id doaj-art-8c7d83106dbe4039b065c2da00f289b5
institution Kabale University
issn 1002-6630
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher China Food Publishing Company
record_format Article
series Shipin Kexue
spelling doaj-art-8c7d83106dbe4039b065c2da00f289b52025-08-20T03:25:07ZengChina Food Publishing CompanyShipin Kexue1002-66302025-05-014610313810.7506/spkx1002-6630-20240716-161Fruit Quality Evaluation and Optimal Selection of 16 Lines of Feijoa (Acca sellowiana)YANG Shiqi, LIU Yumin, LIU Yamin, LI Ju, LI Chengxiang, GAO Bingli0(1. College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China; 2. Chongqing Hemu Qianli Ecological Agriculture Technology Co. Ltd., Chongqing 402760, China)In order to comprehensively evaluate the difference in fruit quality among 16 different feijoa lines, this study determined the external and internal quality indicators and antioxidant activities of 16 feijoa lines. Variability analysis, correlation analysis and principal component analysis were used to identify core indicators. The weights of these indicators were determined by analytic hierarchy process, and a comprehensive evaluation model for fruit quality was established by grey relational analysis. The accuracy of the model was verified by sensory evaluation. The results indicated a significant variation in fruit quality across feijoa lines. Four core fruit quality indexes were selected, including single fruit mass (X1), juice yield (X2), sugar/acid ratio (X3), and total phenol content (X4). The comprehensive evaluation model was described as follows: weighted grey relational grade = 0.381 0X1 + 0.298 2X2 + 0.210 8X3 + 0.110 0X4. The model results were correlated well with those of sensory evaluation (R2 = 0.869), indicating high accuracy of the model. Two excellent lines, Y4 and Y1, were selected for promotion. The findings provide a reference for the establishment of a comprehensive evaluation system for feijoa quality and offer scientific guidance for feijoa breeding.https://www.spkx.net.cn/fileup/1002-6630/PDF/2025-46-10-004.pdffeijoa; fruit quality; analytic hierarchy process; grey relational analysis; comprehensive evaluation
spellingShingle YANG Shiqi, LIU Yumin, LIU Yamin, LI Ju, LI Chengxiang, GAO Bingli
Fruit Quality Evaluation and Optimal Selection of 16 Lines of Feijoa (Acca sellowiana)
Shipin Kexue
feijoa; fruit quality; analytic hierarchy process; grey relational analysis; comprehensive evaluation
title Fruit Quality Evaluation and Optimal Selection of 16 Lines of Feijoa (Acca sellowiana)
title_full Fruit Quality Evaluation and Optimal Selection of 16 Lines of Feijoa (Acca sellowiana)
title_fullStr Fruit Quality Evaluation and Optimal Selection of 16 Lines of Feijoa (Acca sellowiana)
title_full_unstemmed Fruit Quality Evaluation and Optimal Selection of 16 Lines of Feijoa (Acca sellowiana)
title_short Fruit Quality Evaluation and Optimal Selection of 16 Lines of Feijoa (Acca sellowiana)
title_sort fruit quality evaluation and optimal selection of 16 lines of feijoa acca sellowiana
topic feijoa; fruit quality; analytic hierarchy process; grey relational analysis; comprehensive evaluation
url https://www.spkx.net.cn/fileup/1002-6630/PDF/2025-46-10-004.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT yangshiqiliuyuminliuyaminlijulichengxianggaobingli fruitqualityevaluationandoptimalselectionof16linesoffeijoaaccasellowiana