Blastocyst selection through an interpretable artificial intelligence method versus traditional morphology grading: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Introduction The quality of the blastocyst (day 5/6 embryo) selected for transfer is critical for the success of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment. Embryologists perform blastocyst evaluation by observing the morphology of each blastocyst. Human assessment is subjective and inconsistent in pred...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/7/e099631.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849320815469789184 |
|---|---|
| author | Lei Chen Yu Sun Shanshan Wang Chen Sun Hang Liu Guanqiao Shan Haixiang Sun |
| author_facet | Lei Chen Yu Sun Shanshan Wang Chen Sun Hang Liu Guanqiao Shan Haixiang Sun |
| author_sort | Lei Chen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction The quality of the blastocyst (day 5/6 embryo) selected for transfer is critical for the success of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment. Embryologists perform blastocyst evaluation by observing the morphology of each blastocyst. Human assessment is subjective and inconsistent in predicting which blastocyst can result in a successful pregnancy or birth. Several artificial intelligence (AI) methods have been proposed to predict IVF outcomes from blastocyst images. However, the reasoning processes of these AI methods are uninterpretable, causing epistemic and ethical concerns that prevent their implementation in clinical practice. To address this issue, the authors developed a novel interpretable AI method for blastocyst selection. The method is clinically applicable because it is transparent to embryologists and allows them to understand its reasoning processes. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to test the effectiveness of this blastocyst selection method with the aim of improving IVF outcomes.Methods and analysis In this single-centre, single-blind RCT, we will enrol 1100 women aged 20–35 years undergoing their first cycle of IVF, with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The study will be conducted at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, a public class A tertiary hospital in China. On the fifth day of embryo culture, participants with two or more usable blastocysts will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either the conventional morphology group or the AI group. The primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy, defined as a viable intrauterine pregnancy of 12 weeks gestation or more.Ethics and dissemination The research ethics committee of the Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital approved this study (approval number: 2023-259-02). All participants will provide written informed consent prior to enrolment. The findings will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration number ChiCTR2300076851. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8c7740d237044bbc9ce511d5ff0a691c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-8c7740d237044bbc9ce511d5ff0a691c2025-08-20T03:49:56ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552025-07-0115710.1136/bmjopen-2025-099631Blastocyst selection through an interpretable artificial intelligence method versus traditional morphology grading: study protocol for a randomised controlled trialLei Chen0Yu Sun1Shanshan Wang2Chen Sun3Hang Liu4Guanqiao Shan5Haixiang Sun6Center for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, ChinaDepartment of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaCenter for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, ChinaDepartment of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaCenter for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, ChinaIntroduction The quality of the blastocyst (day 5/6 embryo) selected for transfer is critical for the success of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment. Embryologists perform blastocyst evaluation by observing the morphology of each blastocyst. Human assessment is subjective and inconsistent in predicting which blastocyst can result in a successful pregnancy or birth. Several artificial intelligence (AI) methods have been proposed to predict IVF outcomes from blastocyst images. However, the reasoning processes of these AI methods are uninterpretable, causing epistemic and ethical concerns that prevent their implementation in clinical practice. To address this issue, the authors developed a novel interpretable AI method for blastocyst selection. The method is clinically applicable because it is transparent to embryologists and allows them to understand its reasoning processes. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to test the effectiveness of this blastocyst selection method with the aim of improving IVF outcomes.Methods and analysis In this single-centre, single-blind RCT, we will enrol 1100 women aged 20–35 years undergoing their first cycle of IVF, with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The study will be conducted at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, a public class A tertiary hospital in China. On the fifth day of embryo culture, participants with two or more usable blastocysts will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either the conventional morphology group or the AI group. The primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy, defined as a viable intrauterine pregnancy of 12 weeks gestation or more.Ethics and dissemination The research ethics committee of the Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital approved this study (approval number: 2023-259-02). All participants will provide written informed consent prior to enrolment. The findings will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration number ChiCTR2300076851.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/7/e099631.full |
| spellingShingle | Lei Chen Yu Sun Shanshan Wang Chen Sun Hang Liu Guanqiao Shan Haixiang Sun Blastocyst selection through an interpretable artificial intelligence method versus traditional morphology grading: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial BMJ Open |
| title | Blastocyst selection through an interpretable artificial intelligence method versus traditional morphology grading: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
| title_full | Blastocyst selection through an interpretable artificial intelligence method versus traditional morphology grading: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
| title_fullStr | Blastocyst selection through an interpretable artificial intelligence method versus traditional morphology grading: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Blastocyst selection through an interpretable artificial intelligence method versus traditional morphology grading: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
| title_short | Blastocyst selection through an interpretable artificial intelligence method versus traditional morphology grading: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
| title_sort | blastocyst selection through an interpretable artificial intelligence method versus traditional morphology grading study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/7/e099631.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT leichen blastocystselectionthroughaninterpretableartificialintelligencemethodversustraditionalmorphologygradingstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT yusun blastocystselectionthroughaninterpretableartificialintelligencemethodversustraditionalmorphologygradingstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT shanshanwang blastocystselectionthroughaninterpretableartificialintelligencemethodversustraditionalmorphologygradingstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT chensun blastocystselectionthroughaninterpretableartificialintelligencemethodversustraditionalmorphologygradingstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hangliu blastocystselectionthroughaninterpretableartificialintelligencemethodversustraditionalmorphologygradingstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT guanqiaoshan blastocystselectionthroughaninterpretableartificialintelligencemethodversustraditionalmorphologygradingstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT haixiangsun blastocystselectionthroughaninterpretableartificialintelligencemethodversustraditionalmorphologygradingstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |