Operational wind plants increase planetary boundary layer height: an observational study

<p>As wind energy deployment grows, interactions between wind plants and the surrounding environment become more prevalent. The current investigation seeks to understand these interactions by characterizing the impact of wind plants on the planetary boundary layer height (PBLH), utilizing obse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Abraham, M. Puccioni, A. Jordan, E. Maric, N. Bodini, N. Hamilton, S. Letizia, P. M. Klein, E. N. Smith, S. Wharton, J. Gero, J. D. Jacob, R. Krishnamurthy, R. K. Newsom, M. Pekour, W. Radünz, P. Moriarty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2025-08-01
Series:Wind Energy Science
Online Access:https://wes.copernicus.org/articles/10/1681/2025/wes-10-1681-2025.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:<p>As wind energy deployment grows, interactions between wind plants and the surrounding environment become more prevalent. The current investigation seeks to understand these interactions by characterizing the impact of wind plants on the planetary boundary layer height (PBLH), utilizing observations from the American WAKE experimeNt (AWAKEN) campaign. Given the ambiguity of the definition of PBLH under stable atmospheric conditions, where the impact of wind plants is expected to be strongest, a comparison of different methods for identifying PBLH is first conducted using data collected by multiple types of instruments. The Heffter method is selected as the thermodynamic method because it generates the most consistent results for the radiosonde and infrared spectrometer. A minimum vertical velocity variance method is used for a turbulence-based definition. Using both of these methods, the values of PBLH measured at spatially distributed sites are compared under a range of atmospheric conditions. Both methods show a clear increase in PBLH downstream of a wind plant for stable conditions. These impacts are strongest when the upstream PBLH is shallow (less than 0.25 km), with the thermodynamic method showing a PBLH increase of 35 %–39 % and the turbulence-based method showing a 143 % increase. At a site 20 km downstream of the wind plant, these effects are no longer observed, suggesting PBLH is not influenced by the wind plant at this distance. The results of this investigation show that wind plants can modify PBLH in their vicinity. As PBLH is a key parameter for numerical models, this insight into wind plant–atmosphere interactions can be used to validate and improve the accuracy of wind energy forecasts.</p>
ISSN:2366-7443
2366-7451