Truth and justification in the criminal procedure
After clarifying that the only truth that criminal judge must declare is the “sad truth” of the defendant’s culpability, the Author of this article disputes the widespread opinion that this truth would be a minor and conventional truth, not comparable to scientific or historical ones. Also in the cr...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal
2017-03-01
|
| Series: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/30 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850053191548272640 |
|---|---|
| author | Francesco Caprioli |
| author_facet | Francesco Caprioli |
| author_sort | Francesco Caprioli |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | After clarifying that the only truth that criminal judge must declare is the “sad truth” of the defendant’s culpability, the Author of this article disputes the widespread opinion that this truth would be a minor and conventional truth, not comparable to scientific or historical ones. Also in the criminal proceedings we pursue the Truth with capital T, which must be regarded as correspondence between the indictment and the facts described in it. Only under these conditions the judgment of conviction can be considered rationally justified. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8b866151c5cc430dbd0a7426a815c678 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2525-510X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2017-03-01 |
| publisher | Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal |
| spelling | doaj-art-8b866151c5cc430dbd0a7426a815c6782025-08-20T02:52:35ZengInstituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual PenalRevista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal2525-510X2017-03-013131734210.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.3024Truth and justification in the criminal procedureFrancesco Caprioli0Università degli studi di Torino/ItáliaAfter clarifying that the only truth that criminal judge must declare is the “sad truth” of the defendant’s culpability, the Author of this article disputes the widespread opinion that this truth would be a minor and conventional truth, not comparable to scientific or historical ones. Also in the criminal proceedings we pursue the Truth with capital T, which must be regarded as correspondence between the indictment and the facts described in it. Only under these conditions the judgment of conviction can be considered rationally justified.http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/30Processo PenalVerdadeValoração da provaProcesso penal italiano. |
| spellingShingle | Francesco Caprioli Truth and justification in the criminal procedure Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal Processo Penal Verdade Valoração da prova Processo penal italiano. |
| title | Truth and justification in the criminal procedure |
| title_full | Truth and justification in the criminal procedure |
| title_fullStr | Truth and justification in the criminal procedure |
| title_full_unstemmed | Truth and justification in the criminal procedure |
| title_short | Truth and justification in the criminal procedure |
| title_sort | truth and justification in the criminal procedure |
| topic | Processo Penal Verdade Valoração da prova Processo penal italiano. |
| url | http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/30 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT francescocaprioli truthandjustificationinthecriminalprocedure |