Breeding bird response to adaptive multi‐paddock and continuous grazing practices in Southeastern United States
Abstract Grassland bird populations are declining steeply, reflecting the degradation and loss of native grassland habitats. To assess how grazing management affects declining grassland bird populations, we compared breeding avifaunal communities in adaptive multi‐paddock (AMP) grazed and continuous...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Ecosphere |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70107 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832584187882766336 |
|---|---|
| author | Michael J. McGraw Steven I. Apfelbaum Ry Thompson Fugui Wang Michael A. Szuter Richard Teague Peter Byck Russ Conser |
| author_facet | Michael J. McGraw Steven I. Apfelbaum Ry Thompson Fugui Wang Michael A. Szuter Richard Teague Peter Byck Russ Conser |
| author_sort | Michael J. McGraw |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Grassland bird populations are declining steeply, reflecting the degradation and loss of native grassland habitats. To assess how grazing management affects declining grassland bird populations, we compared breeding avifaunal communities in adaptive multi‐paddock (AMP) grazed and continuously grazed (CG) pastures in the Southeastern United States. AMP grazing involves alternating very short grazing periods at high animal densities with prolonged recovery periods across many small paddocks. Both the AMP and CG paddocks attracted obligate grassland birds during the breeding season; however, AMP‐grazed paddocks supported significantly higher detection of four obligate grassland breeding bird species. We used distance sampling techniques to account for differences in detectability for each species. The resulting densities for the grassland guild and Eastern Meadowlark as a species both revealed significantly higher densities within the AMP versus CG paddocks. Despite significantly more unadjusted detections of confirmed breeding ecotonal species, such as Blue Grosbeak, Eastern Bluebird, Brown Thrasher, Yellow‐breasted Chat, Eastern Towhee, Loggerhead Shrike, and Field Sparrow in AMP versus CG paddocks, no significant difference was found in the ecotonal guild after adjusting densities using effective detection radii. The CG paddocks supported fewer obligate grassland and ecotonal birds, with some exceptions (e.g., higher adjusted density of Eastern Bluebirds in CG) but supported comparable overall bird species richness. AMP grazing practices offer a viable strategy for increasing the diversity and abundance of obligate grassland and ecotonal breeding birds within existing cattle‐grazed landscapes in the Southeastern United States. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8b8277ec77584e658a51d4180a091e46 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2150-8925 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecosphere |
| spelling | doaj-art-8b8277ec77584e658a51d4180a091e462025-01-27T14:51:33ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252024-12-011512n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.70107Breeding bird response to adaptive multi‐paddock and continuous grazing practices in Southeastern United StatesMichael J. McGraw0Steven I. Apfelbaum1Ry Thompson2Fugui Wang3Michael A. Szuter4Richard Teague5Peter Byck6Russ Conser7Resource Environmental Solutions Bellaire Texas USAApplied Ecological Institute, Inc. Juda Wisconsin USAResource Environmental Solutions Bellaire Texas USAAgoro Carbon Alliance Tampa Florida USAResource Environmental Solutions Bellaire Texas USATexas A&M AgriLife Research Center Vernon Texas USASchool of Sustainability, Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USAStandard Soil Fulshear Texas USAAbstract Grassland bird populations are declining steeply, reflecting the degradation and loss of native grassland habitats. To assess how grazing management affects declining grassland bird populations, we compared breeding avifaunal communities in adaptive multi‐paddock (AMP) grazed and continuously grazed (CG) pastures in the Southeastern United States. AMP grazing involves alternating very short grazing periods at high animal densities with prolonged recovery periods across many small paddocks. Both the AMP and CG paddocks attracted obligate grassland birds during the breeding season; however, AMP‐grazed paddocks supported significantly higher detection of four obligate grassland breeding bird species. We used distance sampling techniques to account for differences in detectability for each species. The resulting densities for the grassland guild and Eastern Meadowlark as a species both revealed significantly higher densities within the AMP versus CG paddocks. Despite significantly more unadjusted detections of confirmed breeding ecotonal species, such as Blue Grosbeak, Eastern Bluebird, Brown Thrasher, Yellow‐breasted Chat, Eastern Towhee, Loggerhead Shrike, and Field Sparrow in AMP versus CG paddocks, no significant difference was found in the ecotonal guild after adjusting densities using effective detection radii. The CG paddocks supported fewer obligate grassland and ecotonal birds, with some exceptions (e.g., higher adjusted density of Eastern Bluebirds in CG) but supported comparable overall bird species richness. AMP grazing practices offer a viable strategy for increasing the diversity and abundance of obligate grassland and ecotonal breeding birds within existing cattle‐grazed landscapes in the Southeastern United States.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70107AMP grazingbiodiversitybird conservationbreeding bird densitygrasslandgrazing practice |
| spellingShingle | Michael J. McGraw Steven I. Apfelbaum Ry Thompson Fugui Wang Michael A. Szuter Richard Teague Peter Byck Russ Conser Breeding bird response to adaptive multi‐paddock and continuous grazing practices in Southeastern United States Ecosphere AMP grazing biodiversity bird conservation breeding bird density grassland grazing practice |
| title | Breeding bird response to adaptive multi‐paddock and continuous grazing practices in Southeastern United States |
| title_full | Breeding bird response to adaptive multi‐paddock and continuous grazing practices in Southeastern United States |
| title_fullStr | Breeding bird response to adaptive multi‐paddock and continuous grazing practices in Southeastern United States |
| title_full_unstemmed | Breeding bird response to adaptive multi‐paddock and continuous grazing practices in Southeastern United States |
| title_short | Breeding bird response to adaptive multi‐paddock and continuous grazing practices in Southeastern United States |
| title_sort | breeding bird response to adaptive multi paddock and continuous grazing practices in southeastern united states |
| topic | AMP grazing biodiversity bird conservation breeding bird density grassland grazing practice |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70107 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT michaeljmcgraw breedingbirdresponsetoadaptivemultipaddockandcontinuousgrazingpracticesinsoutheasternunitedstates AT steveniapfelbaum breedingbirdresponsetoadaptivemultipaddockandcontinuousgrazingpracticesinsoutheasternunitedstates AT rythompson breedingbirdresponsetoadaptivemultipaddockandcontinuousgrazingpracticesinsoutheasternunitedstates AT fuguiwang breedingbirdresponsetoadaptivemultipaddockandcontinuousgrazingpracticesinsoutheasternunitedstates AT michaelaszuter breedingbirdresponsetoadaptivemultipaddockandcontinuousgrazingpracticesinsoutheasternunitedstates AT richardteague breedingbirdresponsetoadaptivemultipaddockandcontinuousgrazingpracticesinsoutheasternunitedstates AT peterbyck breedingbirdresponsetoadaptivemultipaddockandcontinuousgrazingpracticesinsoutheasternunitedstates AT russconser breedingbirdresponsetoadaptivemultipaddockandcontinuousgrazingpracticesinsoutheasternunitedstates |