Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of nicotine chewing gum and nicotine patches as nicotine replacement therapy using salivary cotinine levels as a biochemical validation measure

Background: Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and habit cessation counseling are considered the mainstay treatment for high nicotine dependence smokers. However, adherence to NRT is very poor. Among the NRTs, nicotine gums and nicotine patches are the most widely available. This study mainly evalua...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T Sivasankari, Avudaiappan Sankaran, Senthil Murugappan, Veni Subramanyam, Balanehru Subramanian, RC Jagat Reddy, S Vandana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-06-01
Series:Indian Journal of Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_314_22
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591244334727168
author T Sivasankari
Avudaiappan Sankaran
Senthil Murugappan
Veni Subramanyam
Balanehru Subramanian
RC Jagat Reddy
S Vandana
author_facet T Sivasankari
Avudaiappan Sankaran
Senthil Murugappan
Veni Subramanyam
Balanehru Subramanian
RC Jagat Reddy
S Vandana
author_sort T Sivasankari
collection DOAJ
description Background: Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and habit cessation counseling are considered the mainstay treatment for high nicotine dependence smokers. However, adherence to NRT is very poor. Among the NRTs, nicotine gums and nicotine patches are the most widely available. This study mainly evaluates the efficacy of nicotine gum and nicotine patches as NRT using salivary cotinine levels as a biochemical validation measure. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 72 known smokers who were willing to receive nicotine replacement therapy for cessation of smoking habits. The sample was divided into two groups: Group 1 tobacco smokers were offered nicotine chewing gum, and group 2 tobacco smokers were offered nicotine patches. Both groups received treatment for 12 weeks. At baseline and at the end of the trial period, the saliva samples were analyzed for cotinine levels using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The severity of smoking was assessed using the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND). Results: The quit rate was higher in the nicotine patch group compared with the nicotine gum group. On comparison of week one vs week twelve in the nicotine group nicotine gum group showed (CI: 18.10 to 13.83) and in the patch group (CI: 7.754 to 6.56) with P < 0.001. The pre- and post-cotinine estimation was significantly reduced for nicotine patches compared with nicotine gums, and patient compliance also yielded better results for nicotine patches. Conclusion: This study depicts that nicotine patches were better adhered to in comparison with nicotine gums, and salivary cotinine level is an effective biochemical validation measure.
format Article
id doaj-art-8b526844e09f4a3880df96a05837d748
institution Kabale University
issn 0019-5545
1998-3794
language English
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Psychiatry
spelling doaj-art-8b526844e09f4a3880df96a05837d7482025-01-22T14:55:48ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Psychiatry0019-55451998-37942023-06-0165662663410.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_314_22Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of nicotine chewing gum and nicotine patches as nicotine replacement therapy using salivary cotinine levels as a biochemical validation measureT SivasankariAvudaiappan SankaranSenthil MurugappanVeni SubramanyamBalanehru SubramanianRC Jagat ReddyS VandanaBackground: Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and habit cessation counseling are considered the mainstay treatment for high nicotine dependence smokers. However, adherence to NRT is very poor. Among the NRTs, nicotine gums and nicotine patches are the most widely available. This study mainly evaluates the efficacy of nicotine gum and nicotine patches as NRT using salivary cotinine levels as a biochemical validation measure. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 72 known smokers who were willing to receive nicotine replacement therapy for cessation of smoking habits. The sample was divided into two groups: Group 1 tobacco smokers were offered nicotine chewing gum, and group 2 tobacco smokers were offered nicotine patches. Both groups received treatment for 12 weeks. At baseline and at the end of the trial period, the saliva samples were analyzed for cotinine levels using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The severity of smoking was assessed using the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND). Results: The quit rate was higher in the nicotine patch group compared with the nicotine gum group. On comparison of week one vs week twelve in the nicotine group nicotine gum group showed (CI: 18.10 to 13.83) and in the patch group (CI: 7.754 to 6.56) with P < 0.001. The pre- and post-cotinine estimation was significantly reduced for nicotine patches compared with nicotine gums, and patient compliance also yielded better results for nicotine patches. Conclusion: This study depicts that nicotine patches were better adhered to in comparison with nicotine gums, and salivary cotinine level is an effective biochemical validation measure.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_314_22counselingfagerstrom scalenicotine gumsnicotine patches
spellingShingle T Sivasankari
Avudaiappan Sankaran
Senthil Murugappan
Veni Subramanyam
Balanehru Subramanian
RC Jagat Reddy
S Vandana
Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of nicotine chewing gum and nicotine patches as nicotine replacement therapy using salivary cotinine levels as a biochemical validation measure
Indian Journal of Psychiatry
counseling
fagerstrom scale
nicotine gums
nicotine patches
title Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of nicotine chewing gum and nicotine patches as nicotine replacement therapy using salivary cotinine levels as a biochemical validation measure
title_full Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of nicotine chewing gum and nicotine patches as nicotine replacement therapy using salivary cotinine levels as a biochemical validation measure
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of nicotine chewing gum and nicotine patches as nicotine replacement therapy using salivary cotinine levels as a biochemical validation measure
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of nicotine chewing gum and nicotine patches as nicotine replacement therapy using salivary cotinine levels as a biochemical validation measure
title_short Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of nicotine chewing gum and nicotine patches as nicotine replacement therapy using salivary cotinine levels as a biochemical validation measure
title_sort comparative evaluation of the efficacy of nicotine chewing gum and nicotine patches as nicotine replacement therapy using salivary cotinine levels as a biochemical validation measure
topic counseling
fagerstrom scale
nicotine gums
nicotine patches
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_314_22
work_keys_str_mv AT tsivasankari comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyofnicotinechewinggumandnicotinepatchesasnicotinereplacementtherapyusingsalivarycotininelevelsasabiochemicalvalidationmeasure
AT avudaiappansankaran comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyofnicotinechewinggumandnicotinepatchesasnicotinereplacementtherapyusingsalivarycotininelevelsasabiochemicalvalidationmeasure
AT senthilmurugappan comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyofnicotinechewinggumandnicotinepatchesasnicotinereplacementtherapyusingsalivarycotininelevelsasabiochemicalvalidationmeasure
AT venisubramanyam comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyofnicotinechewinggumandnicotinepatchesasnicotinereplacementtherapyusingsalivarycotininelevelsasabiochemicalvalidationmeasure
AT balanehrusubramanian comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyofnicotinechewinggumandnicotinepatchesasnicotinereplacementtherapyusingsalivarycotininelevelsasabiochemicalvalidationmeasure
AT rcjagatreddy comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyofnicotinechewinggumandnicotinepatchesasnicotinereplacementtherapyusingsalivarycotininelevelsasabiochemicalvalidationmeasure
AT svandana comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyofnicotinechewinggumandnicotinepatchesasnicotinereplacementtherapyusingsalivarycotininelevelsasabiochemicalvalidationmeasure