The Elite Paradigm Driving Australian Aid Policy: Learning to Live With the ‘Cautious Consensus’
ABSTRACT This article explores the underlying reasons for why the Albanese Labor Governmentʼs stated policy ambition to ‘rebuild Australiaʼs international development program’ has not yet been accomplished and is unlikely to be realised, at least in the near‐to‐medium term. Based on interviews condu...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.70009 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832576214807609344 |
|---|---|
| author | Benjamin Day Tamas Wells |
| author_facet | Benjamin Day Tamas Wells |
| author_sort | Benjamin Day |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT This article explores the underlying reasons for why the Albanese Labor Governmentʼs stated policy ambition to ‘rebuild Australiaʼs international development program’ has not yet been accomplished and is unlikely to be realised, at least in the near‐to‐medium term. Based on interviews conducted with 21 Australian Members of Parliament, we find that the ‘cautious consensus’—a collection of ideas guiding elite perspectives on Australian aid policy that emerged during the COVID‐19 pandemic—has rapidly consolidated, to the point where it can now be considered a paradigm. We identify three main factors that have led to this consolidation: the declining salience of aid; growing elite scepticism about the usefulness of aid; and a combination of political challenges that are difficult for Labor to navigate, as it seeks to become a long‐term Government. Given the prospects of shifting the unambitious status quo are unlikely in the in the near‐to‐medium term, we examine what ‘living with the cautious consensus’ means for the Australian development sector. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8b2dd6f37375418684572583dcae9e08 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2050-2680 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies |
| spelling | doaj-art-8b2dd6f37375418684572583dcae9e082025-01-31T08:45:15ZengWileyAsia & the Pacific Policy Studies2050-26802025-01-01121n/an/a10.1002/app5.70009The Elite Paradigm Driving Australian Aid Policy: Learning to Live With the ‘Cautious Consensus’Benjamin Day0Tamas Wells1Department of International Relations ANU College of Asia & the Pacific The Australian National University Canberra AustraliaSchool of Social and Political Sciences Faculty of Arts University of Melbourne Melbourne AustraliaABSTRACT This article explores the underlying reasons for why the Albanese Labor Governmentʼs stated policy ambition to ‘rebuild Australiaʼs international development program’ has not yet been accomplished and is unlikely to be realised, at least in the near‐to‐medium term. Based on interviews conducted with 21 Australian Members of Parliament, we find that the ‘cautious consensus’—a collection of ideas guiding elite perspectives on Australian aid policy that emerged during the COVID‐19 pandemic—has rapidly consolidated, to the point where it can now be considered a paradigm. We identify three main factors that have led to this consolidation: the declining salience of aid; growing elite scepticism about the usefulness of aid; and a combination of political challenges that are difficult for Labor to navigate, as it seeks to become a long‐term Government. Given the prospects of shifting the unambitious status quo are unlikely in the in the near‐to‐medium term, we examine what ‘living with the cautious consensus’ means for the Australian development sector.https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.70009Australian aidbipartisanshipdevelopment assistanceforeign aidpolicy studiespolitical elites |
| spellingShingle | Benjamin Day Tamas Wells The Elite Paradigm Driving Australian Aid Policy: Learning to Live With the ‘Cautious Consensus’ Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies Australian aid bipartisanship development assistance foreign aid policy studies political elites |
| title | The Elite Paradigm Driving Australian Aid Policy: Learning to Live With the ‘Cautious Consensus’ |
| title_full | The Elite Paradigm Driving Australian Aid Policy: Learning to Live With the ‘Cautious Consensus’ |
| title_fullStr | The Elite Paradigm Driving Australian Aid Policy: Learning to Live With the ‘Cautious Consensus’ |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Elite Paradigm Driving Australian Aid Policy: Learning to Live With the ‘Cautious Consensus’ |
| title_short | The Elite Paradigm Driving Australian Aid Policy: Learning to Live With the ‘Cautious Consensus’ |
| title_sort | elite paradigm driving australian aid policy learning to live with the cautious consensus |
| topic | Australian aid bipartisanship development assistance foreign aid policy studies political elites |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.70009 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT benjaminday theeliteparadigmdrivingaustralianaidpolicylearningtolivewiththecautiousconsensus AT tamaswells theeliteparadigmdrivingaustralianaidpolicylearningtolivewiththecautiousconsensus AT benjaminday eliteparadigmdrivingaustralianaidpolicylearningtolivewiththecautiousconsensus AT tamaswells eliteparadigmdrivingaustralianaidpolicylearningtolivewiththecautiousconsensus |