The Feasibility Study of the Acceptance of the Liability of Human Interests Loss in the Light of the Rule of Prohibition of Detriment (Arabic: لا ضَرَرَ, principle of harm)

There are disagreements about the issue of the “liability of human lost interests” in Imamiyyah jurisprudence, despite the consensus of the majority of jurists on the principle of the necessity of compensating for unjust losses and its reasonableness, which can be rooted in the difference between th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sayyid Ali Sajjadizadeh, Ali Asghar Sa'emi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Razavi University of Islamic Sciences 2023-05-01
Series:آموزه‌‌های فقه مدني
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cjd.razavi.ac.ir/article_1446_0004ff58394b9823de8fd980bcb9f41d.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849253568363626496
author Sayyid Ali Sajjadizadeh
Ali Asghar Sa'emi
author_facet Sayyid Ali Sajjadizadeh
Ali Asghar Sa'emi
author_sort Sayyid Ali Sajjadizadeh
collection DOAJ
description There are disagreements about the issue of the “liability of human lost interests” in Imamiyyah jurisprudence, despite the consensus of the majority of jurists on the principle of the necessity of compensating for unjust losses and its reasonableness, which can be rooted in the difference between the approach of jurists in the jurisprudential principles of “liability”. Therefore, one of the remarkable jurisprudential proofs (evidence) of the necessity of compensation (liability) is the rule of “prohibition of detriment (Arabic: لا ضَرَرَ, principle of harm)”, which has been accepted by a number of jurists, especially a group of Imami jurists. The question of this research is whether it is possible to consider “the necessity of compensating for the loss caused by the lost interests of human” within the rule of the “prohibition of detriment” and the jurisprudential views about it? There are two different jurisprudential views in this regard based on the findings of this study, which have been accomplished in descriptive-analytical method and by referring to reliable sources of jurisprudence. The authors, by defending the view of expanding the rule of “prohibition of detriment” and the evidence of reason, has proved the jurisprudential view that believes in the “liability of human lost interests”.
format Article
id doaj-art-8b2db9c828e24158abeb1581f477948d
institution Kabale University
issn 2251-936X
2783-3690
language fas
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Razavi University of Islamic Sciences
record_format Article
series آموزه‌‌های فقه مدني
spelling doaj-art-8b2db9c828e24158abeb1581f477948d2025-08-20T03:56:17ZfasRazavi University of Islamic Sciencesآموزه‌‌های فقه مدني2251-936X2783-36902023-05-0115276910010.30513/cjd.2021.2647.14781446The Feasibility Study of the Acceptance of the Liability of Human Interests Loss in the Light of the Rule of Prohibition of Detriment (Arabic: لا ضَرَرَ, principle of harm)Sayyid Ali Sajjadizadeh0Ali Asghar Sa'emi1Assistant professor at Razavi University of Islamic Sciences(A student at the 4th level of Mashhad seminary)There are disagreements about the issue of the “liability of human lost interests” in Imamiyyah jurisprudence, despite the consensus of the majority of jurists on the principle of the necessity of compensating for unjust losses and its reasonableness, which can be rooted in the difference between the approach of jurists in the jurisprudential principles of “liability”. Therefore, one of the remarkable jurisprudential proofs (evidence) of the necessity of compensation (liability) is the rule of “prohibition of detriment (Arabic: لا ضَرَرَ, principle of harm)”, which has been accepted by a number of jurists, especially a group of Imami jurists. The question of this research is whether it is possible to consider “the necessity of compensating for the loss caused by the lost interests of human” within the rule of the “prohibition of detriment” and the jurisprudential views about it? There are two different jurisprudential views in this regard based on the findings of this study, which have been accomplished in descriptive-analytical method and by referring to reliable sources of jurisprudence. The authors, by defending the view of expanding the rule of “prohibition of detriment” and the evidence of reason, has proved the jurisprudential view that believes in the “liability of human lost interests”.https://cjd.razavi.ac.ir/article_1446_0004ff58394b9823de8fd980bcb9f41d.pdfhuman interestsliabilitycivil liabilityprohibition of detriment (arabic: لا ضَرَرَprinciple of harm)
spellingShingle Sayyid Ali Sajjadizadeh
Ali Asghar Sa'emi
The Feasibility Study of the Acceptance of the Liability of Human Interests Loss in the Light of the Rule of Prohibition of Detriment (Arabic: لا ضَرَرَ, principle of harm)
آموزه‌‌های فقه مدني
human interests
liability
civil liability
prohibition of detriment (arabic: لا ضَرَرَ
principle of harm)
title The Feasibility Study of the Acceptance of the Liability of Human Interests Loss in the Light of the Rule of Prohibition of Detriment (Arabic: لا ضَرَرَ, principle of harm)
title_full The Feasibility Study of the Acceptance of the Liability of Human Interests Loss in the Light of the Rule of Prohibition of Detriment (Arabic: لا ضَرَرَ, principle of harm)
title_fullStr The Feasibility Study of the Acceptance of the Liability of Human Interests Loss in the Light of the Rule of Prohibition of Detriment (Arabic: لا ضَرَرَ, principle of harm)
title_full_unstemmed The Feasibility Study of the Acceptance of the Liability of Human Interests Loss in the Light of the Rule of Prohibition of Detriment (Arabic: لا ضَرَرَ, principle of harm)
title_short The Feasibility Study of the Acceptance of the Liability of Human Interests Loss in the Light of the Rule of Prohibition of Detriment (Arabic: لا ضَرَرَ, principle of harm)
title_sort feasibility study of the acceptance of the liability of human interests loss in the light of the rule of prohibition of detriment arabic لا ضَرَرَ principle of harm
topic human interests
liability
civil liability
prohibition of detriment (arabic: لا ضَرَرَ
principle of harm)
url https://cjd.razavi.ac.ir/article_1446_0004ff58394b9823de8fd980bcb9f41d.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sayyidalisajjadizadeh thefeasibilitystudyoftheacceptanceoftheliabilityofhumaninterestslossinthelightoftheruleofprohibitionofdetrimentarabiclạḍararaprincipleofharm
AT aliasgharsa039emi thefeasibilitystudyoftheacceptanceoftheliabilityofhumaninterestslossinthelightoftheruleofprohibitionofdetrimentarabiclạḍararaprincipleofharm
AT sayyidalisajjadizadeh feasibilitystudyoftheacceptanceoftheliabilityofhumaninterestslossinthelightoftheruleofprohibitionofdetrimentarabiclạḍararaprincipleofharm
AT aliasgharsa039emi feasibilitystudyoftheacceptanceoftheliabilityofhumaninterestslossinthelightoftheruleofprohibitionofdetrimentarabiclạḍararaprincipleofharm