Mind the gap: Experimental tests to improve efficacy of fladry for nonlethal management of coyotes

ABSTRACT Coyotes (Canis latrans) are the top predator of livestock in the contiguous United States. Developing more effective nonlethal tools to prevent coyote depredation will facilitate coexistence between livestock producers and coyotes. Fladry is a nonlethal deterrent designed to defend livestoc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julie K. Young, John Draper, Stewart Breck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-06-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.970
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850064666791772160
author Julie K. Young
John Draper
Stewart Breck
author_facet Julie K. Young
John Draper
Stewart Breck
author_sort Julie K. Young
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Coyotes (Canis latrans) are the top predator of livestock in the contiguous United States. Developing more effective nonlethal tools to prevent coyote depredation will facilitate coexistence between livestock producers and coyotes. Fladry is a nonlethal deterrent designed to defend livestock by creating a visual barrier to wolves (C. lupus). Fladry may also be effective with coyotes, but large gap spacing between flags may reduce its efficacy. To address this issue, we performed 2 experiments on captive coyotes using fladry modified to reduce gap spacing at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Predator Research Facility in Millville, Utah, USA, during 2015–2016 and 2017–2018. In 2015–2016, we tested 2 styles for attaching flags (top‐knot and shower‐curtain) to the rope‐line that reduce gaps by preventing coiling of individual flags. In 2017–2018, we tested the efficacy of gap spacing (27.9 cm vs. 45.7 cm) between flags for preventing coyote crossings. For both tests, we compared the time until coyotes crossed the fladry between treatment types. We found no differences in time to crossing between the 2 attachment designs. In our second experiment, fladry with smaller gaps between flags had greater efficacy of preventing coyote crossings than did fladry with larger gaps. Our results also indicated that for each additional minute coyotes spent interacting with fladry overall (i.e., increased persistent behavior), survival of the barrier decreased. These results suggest that persistent coyotes may overcome neophobia more rapidly than coyotes that do not exhibit persistent behaviors. Furthermore, use of top‐knot fladry and coyote‐width spacing will increase protection of livestock from coyotes. © 2019 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-8afedc3eb98d48809fe5a009a7ac0b1a
institution DOAJ
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-8afedc3eb98d48809fe5a009a7ac0b1a2025-08-20T02:49:15ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402019-06-0143226527110.1002/wsb.970Mind the gap: Experimental tests to improve efficacy of fladry for nonlethal management of coyotesJulie K. Young0John Draper1Stewart Breck2U.S. Department of Agriculture National Wildlife Research Center, Predator Research Facility Millville UT 84326 USAEcology Center Utah State University Logan UT 84322 USAU.S. Department of Agriculture National Wildlife Research Center, Predator Research Facility Fort Collins CO 80521 USAABSTRACT Coyotes (Canis latrans) are the top predator of livestock in the contiguous United States. Developing more effective nonlethal tools to prevent coyote depredation will facilitate coexistence between livestock producers and coyotes. Fladry is a nonlethal deterrent designed to defend livestock by creating a visual barrier to wolves (C. lupus). Fladry may also be effective with coyotes, but large gap spacing between flags may reduce its efficacy. To address this issue, we performed 2 experiments on captive coyotes using fladry modified to reduce gap spacing at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Predator Research Facility in Millville, Utah, USA, during 2015–2016 and 2017–2018. In 2015–2016, we tested 2 styles for attaching flags (top‐knot and shower‐curtain) to the rope‐line that reduce gaps by preventing coiling of individual flags. In 2017–2018, we tested the efficacy of gap spacing (27.9 cm vs. 45.7 cm) between flags for preventing coyote crossings. For both tests, we compared the time until coyotes crossed the fladry between treatment types. We found no differences in time to crossing between the 2 attachment designs. In our second experiment, fladry with smaller gaps between flags had greater efficacy of preventing coyote crossings than did fladry with larger gaps. Our results also indicated that for each additional minute coyotes spent interacting with fladry overall (i.e., increased persistent behavior), survival of the barrier decreased. These results suggest that persistent coyotes may overcome neophobia more rapidly than coyotes that do not exhibit persistent behaviors. Furthermore, use of top‐knot fladry and coyote‐width spacing will increase protection of livestock from coyotes. © 2019 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.970Canis latranscarnivoreconservationcoyotelivestock depredationnonlethal control
spellingShingle Julie K. Young
John Draper
Stewart Breck
Mind the gap: Experimental tests to improve efficacy of fladry for nonlethal management of coyotes
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Canis latrans
carnivore
conservation
coyote
livestock depredation
nonlethal control
title Mind the gap: Experimental tests to improve efficacy of fladry for nonlethal management of coyotes
title_full Mind the gap: Experimental tests to improve efficacy of fladry for nonlethal management of coyotes
title_fullStr Mind the gap: Experimental tests to improve efficacy of fladry for nonlethal management of coyotes
title_full_unstemmed Mind the gap: Experimental tests to improve efficacy of fladry for nonlethal management of coyotes
title_short Mind the gap: Experimental tests to improve efficacy of fladry for nonlethal management of coyotes
title_sort mind the gap experimental tests to improve efficacy of fladry for nonlethal management of coyotes
topic Canis latrans
carnivore
conservation
coyote
livestock depredation
nonlethal control
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.970
work_keys_str_mv AT juliekyoung mindthegapexperimentalteststoimproveefficacyoffladryfornonlethalmanagementofcoyotes
AT johndraper mindthegapexperimentalteststoimproveefficacyoffladryfornonlethalmanagementofcoyotes
AT stewartbreck mindthegapexperimentalteststoimproveefficacyoffladryfornonlethalmanagementofcoyotes