Investigating the Social Boundaries of Fairness by Modeling Ultimatum Game Responders’ Decisions with Multinomial Processing Tree Models
Fairness in competitive games such as the Ultimatum Game is often defined theoretically. According to some of the literature, in which fairness is determined only based on resource allocation, a proposal splitting resources evenly (i.e., 5:5) is generally assumed as fair, and minimal deviation (i.e....
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Marco Biella, Max Hennig, Laura Oswald |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Games |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/16/1/2 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Dynamic interplay of hierarchical rank and social contexts in shaping perceived fairness
by: Yaner Su, et al.
Published: (2025-08-01) -
Detailed analysis of drift diffusion model parameters estimated for the ultimatum game
by: Shotaro Numano, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
The influence of third-party's power on multi-player fairness decision-making
by: Xiaoqing Lu, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
A Critique of Methodological Individualism: The Concept of Altruism and Application of the Ultimatum Game
by: Yıldız Zeliha Hatipoğlu
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Beyond Choice: Affective Representations of Economic and Moral Decisions
by: Jongwan Kim, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01)