Intensive care infection score: ICIS discriminates between infected and uninfected critically ill patients in routine intensive care unit practice

Abstract Background Diagnosis of infectious inflammation is challenging as acute phase protein expression is nonspecific, limiting the utility of well-established biomarkers, such as procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). The emergent blood cell-derived Intensive Care Infection Score (ICI...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emre Deniz, Stefanie Klatte, Nilgün Tekin-Bubenheim, Mathias Zimmermann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-06-01
Series:Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00767-3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849470083657629696
author Emre Deniz
Stefanie Klatte
Nilgün Tekin-Bubenheim
Mathias Zimmermann
author_facet Emre Deniz
Stefanie Klatte
Nilgün Tekin-Bubenheim
Mathias Zimmermann
author_sort Emre Deniz
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Diagnosis of infectious inflammation is challenging as acute phase protein expression is nonspecific, limiting the utility of well-established biomarkers, such as procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). The emergent blood cell-derived Intensive Care Infection Score (ICIS) is an innovative approach for the sensitive and specific diagnosis of infection in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This study aimed to confirm the suitability of routine ICIS use in various ICU settings. Methods This retrospective study included 115 patients from three ICUs. Seventy-five patients were diagnosed as infected and 40 as uninfected. ICIS, CRP, and PCT were compared to routine clinical assessment to evaluate their effectiveness in predicting infection in critically ill patients. Results ICIS was superior to CRP and PCT in discriminating infection from no infection on day 1 in the ICU. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, ICIS exhibited an AUC = 0.984, sensitivity of 90.7%, specificity of 97.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 97.7% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 89.9%, by the best cutoff value of 3. CRP gave an AUC = 0.727, PPV of 70.0% and NPV of 67.8% by best cutoff value of 8.3 mg/L with a sensitivity of 74.7% and specificity of 62.5%. The best cutoff value of 0.9 ng/mL was calculated for PCT with an AUC = 0.812, PPV of 84.4%, NPV of 70.3%, sensitivity of 69.3% and specificity of 85.0%. Conclusions ICIS outperformed CRP and PCT in identifying infection in critically ill patients across different ICU settings on the first day in the ICU. The high NPV emphasizes the potential of ICIS as an adjuvant tool to rule out infections thereby facilitating the reduction of antibiotic overuse and consequently limiting antimicrobial resistance (AMR) development. ICIS appears suitable for routine implementation in various ICU settings. Graphical Abstract
format Article
id doaj-art-8a949943d74644678dab8e6c4c71ad64
institution Kabale University
issn 2197-425X
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
spelling doaj-art-8a949943d74644678dab8e6c4c71ad642025-08-20T03:25:15ZengSpringerOpenIntensive Care Medicine Experimental2197-425X2025-06-0113111010.1186/s40635-025-00767-3Intensive care infection score: ICIS discriminates between infected and uninfected critically ill patients in routine intensive care unit practiceEmre Deniz0Stefanie Klatte1Nilgün Tekin-Bubenheim2Mathias Zimmermann3Institute of Laboratory Medicine, DRK Kliniken Berlin WestendMedical Science Department, Sysmex Europe SEHematology Department, Sysmex Europe SEInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, DRK Kliniken Berlin WestendAbstract Background Diagnosis of infectious inflammation is challenging as acute phase protein expression is nonspecific, limiting the utility of well-established biomarkers, such as procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). The emergent blood cell-derived Intensive Care Infection Score (ICIS) is an innovative approach for the sensitive and specific diagnosis of infection in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This study aimed to confirm the suitability of routine ICIS use in various ICU settings. Methods This retrospective study included 115 patients from three ICUs. Seventy-five patients were diagnosed as infected and 40 as uninfected. ICIS, CRP, and PCT were compared to routine clinical assessment to evaluate their effectiveness in predicting infection in critically ill patients. Results ICIS was superior to CRP and PCT in discriminating infection from no infection on day 1 in the ICU. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, ICIS exhibited an AUC = 0.984, sensitivity of 90.7%, specificity of 97.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 97.7% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 89.9%, by the best cutoff value of 3. CRP gave an AUC = 0.727, PPV of 70.0% and NPV of 67.8% by best cutoff value of 8.3 mg/L with a sensitivity of 74.7% and specificity of 62.5%. The best cutoff value of 0.9 ng/mL was calculated for PCT with an AUC = 0.812, PPV of 84.4%, NPV of 70.3%, sensitivity of 69.3% and specificity of 85.0%. Conclusions ICIS outperformed CRP and PCT in identifying infection in critically ill patients across different ICU settings on the first day in the ICU. The high NPV emphasizes the potential of ICIS as an adjuvant tool to rule out infections thereby facilitating the reduction of antibiotic overuse and consequently limiting antimicrobial resistance (AMR) development. ICIS appears suitable for routine implementation in various ICU settings. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00767-3InfectionSepsisC-reactive protein (CRP)Procalcitonin (PCT)Intensive care infection score (ICIS)Cellular biomarkers
spellingShingle Emre Deniz
Stefanie Klatte
Nilgün Tekin-Bubenheim
Mathias Zimmermann
Intensive care infection score: ICIS discriminates between infected and uninfected critically ill patients in routine intensive care unit practice
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Infection
Sepsis
C-reactive protein (CRP)
Procalcitonin (PCT)
Intensive care infection score (ICIS)
Cellular biomarkers
title Intensive care infection score: ICIS discriminates between infected and uninfected critically ill patients in routine intensive care unit practice
title_full Intensive care infection score: ICIS discriminates between infected and uninfected critically ill patients in routine intensive care unit practice
title_fullStr Intensive care infection score: ICIS discriminates between infected and uninfected critically ill patients in routine intensive care unit practice
title_full_unstemmed Intensive care infection score: ICIS discriminates between infected and uninfected critically ill patients in routine intensive care unit practice
title_short Intensive care infection score: ICIS discriminates between infected and uninfected critically ill patients in routine intensive care unit practice
title_sort intensive care infection score icis discriminates between infected and uninfected critically ill patients in routine intensive care unit practice
topic Infection
Sepsis
C-reactive protein (CRP)
Procalcitonin (PCT)
Intensive care infection score (ICIS)
Cellular biomarkers
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00767-3
work_keys_str_mv AT emredeniz intensivecareinfectionscoreicisdiscriminatesbetweeninfectedanduninfectedcriticallyillpatientsinroutineintensivecareunitpractice
AT stefanieklatte intensivecareinfectionscoreicisdiscriminatesbetweeninfectedanduninfectedcriticallyillpatientsinroutineintensivecareunitpractice
AT nilguntekinbubenheim intensivecareinfectionscoreicisdiscriminatesbetweeninfectedanduninfectedcriticallyillpatientsinroutineintensivecareunitpractice
AT mathiaszimmermann intensivecareinfectionscoreicisdiscriminatesbetweeninfectedanduninfectedcriticallyillpatientsinroutineintensivecareunitpractice