Statistical overview of the Sniffin’ sticks olfactory test from the perspectives of anosmia and hyposmia

Abstract The Sniffin’ Sticks test is evaluated by summing the scores of threshold, discrimination, and identification subtests to establish an olfactory diagnosis (anosmia, hyposmia, normosmia). However, variations in thresholds, ranges and inconsistencies have been observed. Statistical analyses (d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: László Sipos, Zsófia Galambosi, Sándor Bozóki, Zsombor Szádoczki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93380-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849773839133704192
author László Sipos
Zsófia Galambosi
Sándor Bozóki
Zsombor Szádoczki
author_facet László Sipos
Zsófia Galambosi
Sándor Bozóki
Zsombor Szádoczki
author_sort László Sipos
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The Sniffin’ Sticks test is evaluated by summing the scores of threshold, discrimination, and identification subtests to establish an olfactory diagnosis (anosmia, hyposmia, normosmia). However, variations in thresholds, ranges and inconsistencies have been observed. Statistical analyses (distributions, quantiles), protocol simulation, and implementations of the Sniffin’ Sticks test were conducted. This study contributes a statistical revision: determining a cut-off point for the total TDI score, optimising the number of alternatives in the identification subtest, and equalising correct responses (frequency, balanced in time, subsequent pairs). The upper score threshold used to diagnose anosmia is lower than the typical first-order error thresholds applied in comparable assessments (anosmia ≤ 16.75 points, hyposmia ≥ 17 points at 90% confidence level). In the culturally adapted 16-pen Sniffin’ Sticks identification tests, the frequency of correct responses was aligned with that of the original test. However, the equalisation of the frequency of adjacent correct response pairs and the temporal occurrence of correct responses was not met in any test. The order of all correct answers that simultaneously satisfied all three matching conditions was determined. The practical significance of the results is that the recommended protocol of the Sniffin’ Sticks test system can be implemented in clinical practice with minimal modification.
format Article
id doaj-art-8a8bfe40d0ac4ecab2ff0587fd293167
institution DOAJ
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-8a8bfe40d0ac4ecab2ff0587fd2931672025-08-20T03:01:55ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-03-0115111810.1038/s41598-025-93380-zStatistical overview of the Sniffin’ sticks olfactory test from the perspectives of anosmia and hyposmiaLászló Sipos0Zsófia Galambosi1Sándor Bozóki2Zsombor Szádoczki3Department of Postharvest, Commercial and Sensory Science, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life SciencesDepartment of Postharvest, Commercial and Sensory Science, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life SciencesResearch Laboratory on Engineering & Management Intelligence, HUN-REN Institute for Computer Science and Control (SZTAKI)Research Laboratory on Engineering & Management Intelligence, HUN-REN Institute for Computer Science and Control (SZTAKI)Abstract The Sniffin’ Sticks test is evaluated by summing the scores of threshold, discrimination, and identification subtests to establish an olfactory diagnosis (anosmia, hyposmia, normosmia). However, variations in thresholds, ranges and inconsistencies have been observed. Statistical analyses (distributions, quantiles), protocol simulation, and implementations of the Sniffin’ Sticks test were conducted. This study contributes a statistical revision: determining a cut-off point for the total TDI score, optimising the number of alternatives in the identification subtest, and equalising correct responses (frequency, balanced in time, subsequent pairs). The upper score threshold used to diagnose anosmia is lower than the typical first-order error thresholds applied in comparable assessments (anosmia ≤ 16.75 points, hyposmia ≥ 17 points at 90% confidence level). In the culturally adapted 16-pen Sniffin’ Sticks identification tests, the frequency of correct responses was aligned with that of the original test. However, the equalisation of the frequency of adjacent correct response pairs and the temporal occurrence of correct responses was not met in any test. The order of all correct answers that simultaneously satisfied all three matching conditions was determined. The practical significance of the results is that the recommended protocol of the Sniffin’ Sticks test system can be implemented in clinical practice with minimal modification.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93380-zOlfactory testSniffin’ sticksTDI thresholdIdentificationNumber of alternativesBalanced
spellingShingle László Sipos
Zsófia Galambosi
Sándor Bozóki
Zsombor Szádoczki
Statistical overview of the Sniffin’ sticks olfactory test from the perspectives of anosmia and hyposmia
Scientific Reports
Olfactory test
Sniffin’ sticks
TDI threshold
Identification
Number of alternatives
Balanced
title Statistical overview of the Sniffin’ sticks olfactory test from the perspectives of anosmia and hyposmia
title_full Statistical overview of the Sniffin’ sticks olfactory test from the perspectives of anosmia and hyposmia
title_fullStr Statistical overview of the Sniffin’ sticks olfactory test from the perspectives of anosmia and hyposmia
title_full_unstemmed Statistical overview of the Sniffin’ sticks olfactory test from the perspectives of anosmia and hyposmia
title_short Statistical overview of the Sniffin’ sticks olfactory test from the perspectives of anosmia and hyposmia
title_sort statistical overview of the sniffin sticks olfactory test from the perspectives of anosmia and hyposmia
topic Olfactory test
Sniffin’ sticks
TDI threshold
Identification
Number of alternatives
Balanced
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93380-z
work_keys_str_mv AT laszlosipos statisticaloverviewofthesniffinsticksolfactorytestfromtheperspectivesofanosmiaandhyposmia
AT zsofiagalambosi statisticaloverviewofthesniffinsticksolfactorytestfromtheperspectivesofanosmiaandhyposmia
AT sandorbozoki statisticaloverviewofthesniffinsticksolfactorytestfromtheperspectivesofanosmiaandhyposmia
AT zsomborszadoczki statisticaloverviewofthesniffinsticksolfactorytestfromtheperspectivesofanosmiaandhyposmia