Coupled Lake‐Atmosphere‐Land Physics Uncertainties in a Great Lakes Regional Climate Model

Abstract This study develops a surrogate‐based method to assess the uncertainty within a convective permitting integrated modeling system of the Great Lakes region, arising from interacting physics parameterizations across the lake, atmosphere, and land surface. Perturbed physics ensembles of the mo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: William J. Pringle, Chenfu Huang, Pengfei Xue, Jiali Wang, Khachik Sargsyan, Miraj B. Kayastha, T. C. Chakraborty, Zhao Yang, Yun Qian, Robert D. Hetland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2025-02-01
Series:Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004337
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850187349824110592
author William J. Pringle
Chenfu Huang
Pengfei Xue
Jiali Wang
Khachik Sargsyan
Miraj B. Kayastha
T. C. Chakraborty
Zhao Yang
Yun Qian
Robert D. Hetland
author_facet William J. Pringle
Chenfu Huang
Pengfei Xue
Jiali Wang
Khachik Sargsyan
Miraj B. Kayastha
T. C. Chakraborty
Zhao Yang
Yun Qian
Robert D. Hetland
author_sort William J. Pringle
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This study develops a surrogate‐based method to assess the uncertainty within a convective permitting integrated modeling system of the Great Lakes region, arising from interacting physics parameterizations across the lake, atmosphere, and land surface. Perturbed physics ensembles of the model during the 2018 summer are used to train a neural network surrogate model to predict lake surface temperature (LST) and near‐surface air temperature (T2m). Average physics uncertainties are determined to be 1.5°C for LST and T2m over land, and 1.9°C for T2m over lake, but these have significant spatiotemporal variations. We find that atmospheric physics parameterizations alone are the dominant sources of uncertainty (45%–53%), while lake and land parameterizations account for 33% and 38% of the uncertainty of LST and T2m over land respectively. Interactions of atmosphere physics parameterizations with those of the land and lake contribute to an additional 13%–17% of the total variance. LST and T2m over the lake are more uncertain in the deeper northern lakes, particularly during the rapid warming phase that occurs in late spring/early summer. The LST uncertainty increases with sensitivity to the lake model's surface wind stress scheme. T2m over land is more uncertain over forested areas in the north, where it is most sensitive to the land surface model, than the more agricultural land in the south, where it is most sensitive to the atmospheric planetary boundary and surface layer scheme. Uncertainty also increases in the southwest during multiday temperature declines with higher sensitivity to the land surface model.
format Article
id doaj-art-8a7ab05a12da4e29a60e975e03d1b505
institution OA Journals
issn 1942-2466
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format Article
series Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
spelling doaj-art-8a7ab05a12da4e29a60e975e03d1b5052025-08-20T02:16:06ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems1942-24662025-02-01172n/an/a10.1029/2024MS004337Coupled Lake‐Atmosphere‐Land Physics Uncertainties in a Great Lakes Regional Climate ModelWilliam J. Pringle0Chenfu Huang1Pengfei Xue2Jiali Wang3Khachik Sargsyan4Miraj B. Kayastha5T. C. Chakraborty6Zhao Yang7Yun Qian8Robert D. Hetland9Environmental Science Division Argonne National Laboratory Lemont IL USADepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geospatial Engineering Michigan Technological University Houghton MI USAEnvironmental Science Division Argonne National Laboratory Lemont IL USAEnvironmental Science Division Argonne National Laboratory Lemont IL USASandia National Laboratories Livermore CA USADepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geospatial Engineering Michigan Technological University Houghton MI USAPacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA USAPacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA USAPacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA USAPacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA USAAbstract This study develops a surrogate‐based method to assess the uncertainty within a convective permitting integrated modeling system of the Great Lakes region, arising from interacting physics parameterizations across the lake, atmosphere, and land surface. Perturbed physics ensembles of the model during the 2018 summer are used to train a neural network surrogate model to predict lake surface temperature (LST) and near‐surface air temperature (T2m). Average physics uncertainties are determined to be 1.5°C for LST and T2m over land, and 1.9°C for T2m over lake, but these have significant spatiotemporal variations. We find that atmospheric physics parameterizations alone are the dominant sources of uncertainty (45%–53%), while lake and land parameterizations account for 33% and 38% of the uncertainty of LST and T2m over land respectively. Interactions of atmosphere physics parameterizations with those of the land and lake contribute to an additional 13%–17% of the total variance. LST and T2m over the lake are more uncertain in the deeper northern lakes, particularly during the rapid warming phase that occurs in late spring/early summer. The LST uncertainty increases with sensitivity to the lake model's surface wind stress scheme. T2m over land is more uncertain over forested areas in the north, where it is most sensitive to the land surface model, than the more agricultural land in the south, where it is most sensitive to the atmospheric planetary boundary and surface layer scheme. Uncertainty also increases in the southwest during multiday temperature declines with higher sensitivity to the land surface model.https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004337Great Lakesregional climatelake‐atmosphere‐land interactionsuncertainty quantificationneural networkphysics parameterizations
spellingShingle William J. Pringle
Chenfu Huang
Pengfei Xue
Jiali Wang
Khachik Sargsyan
Miraj B. Kayastha
T. C. Chakraborty
Zhao Yang
Yun Qian
Robert D. Hetland
Coupled Lake‐Atmosphere‐Land Physics Uncertainties in a Great Lakes Regional Climate Model
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Great Lakes
regional climate
lake‐atmosphere‐land interactions
uncertainty quantification
neural network
physics parameterizations
title Coupled Lake‐Atmosphere‐Land Physics Uncertainties in a Great Lakes Regional Climate Model
title_full Coupled Lake‐Atmosphere‐Land Physics Uncertainties in a Great Lakes Regional Climate Model
title_fullStr Coupled Lake‐Atmosphere‐Land Physics Uncertainties in a Great Lakes Regional Climate Model
title_full_unstemmed Coupled Lake‐Atmosphere‐Land Physics Uncertainties in a Great Lakes Regional Climate Model
title_short Coupled Lake‐Atmosphere‐Land Physics Uncertainties in a Great Lakes Regional Climate Model
title_sort coupled lake atmosphere land physics uncertainties in a great lakes regional climate model
topic Great Lakes
regional climate
lake‐atmosphere‐land interactions
uncertainty quantification
neural network
physics parameterizations
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004337
work_keys_str_mv AT williamjpringle coupledlakeatmospherelandphysicsuncertaintiesinagreatlakesregionalclimatemodel
AT chenfuhuang coupledlakeatmospherelandphysicsuncertaintiesinagreatlakesregionalclimatemodel
AT pengfeixue coupledlakeatmospherelandphysicsuncertaintiesinagreatlakesregionalclimatemodel
AT jialiwang coupledlakeatmospherelandphysicsuncertaintiesinagreatlakesregionalclimatemodel
AT khachiksargsyan coupledlakeatmospherelandphysicsuncertaintiesinagreatlakesregionalclimatemodel
AT mirajbkayastha coupledlakeatmospherelandphysicsuncertaintiesinagreatlakesregionalclimatemodel
AT tcchakraborty coupledlakeatmospherelandphysicsuncertaintiesinagreatlakesregionalclimatemodel
AT zhaoyang coupledlakeatmospherelandphysicsuncertaintiesinagreatlakesregionalclimatemodel
AT yunqian coupledlakeatmospherelandphysicsuncertaintiesinagreatlakesregionalclimatemodel
AT robertdhetland coupledlakeatmospherelandphysicsuncertaintiesinagreatlakesregionalclimatemodel