Measurement of Anti-TNF Biologics in Serum Samples of Pediatric Patients: Comparison of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) with a Rapid and Automated Fluorescence-Based Lateral Flow Immunoassay

<b>Background</b>: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) mainly relies on the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). More recently, rapid assays have been developed and validated to reduce turnaround time (TAT). Here, we compared IFX and A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chiara Rossi, Raffaele Simeoli, Giulia Angelino, Sara Cairoli, Fiammetta Bracci, Daniela Knafelz, Erminia Francesca Romeo, Simona Faraci, Giusyda Tarantino, Alessandro Mancini, Alessia Vitale, Carlo Dionisi Vici, Silvia Magni Manzoni, Paola De Angelis, Bianca Maria Goffredo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-03-01
Series:Pharmaceutics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/17/4/421
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:<b>Background</b>: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) mainly relies on the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). More recently, rapid assays have been developed and validated to reduce turnaround time (TAT). Here, we compared IFX and ADL concentrations measured with both ELISA and a new fluorescence-based lateral flow immunoassay (AFIAS). <b>Methods</b>: In serum samples from pediatric patients, IFX and ADL drug levels, and total anti-IFX antibodies were measured using clinically validated ELISA kits (Immundiagnostik AG). Samples were further analyzed using a new rapid assay (AFIAS, Boditech Med Inc.) to measure drug levels and total anti-IFX antibodies. <b>Results</b>: Spearman’s correlation coefficients (rho) were 0.98 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97 to 0.99] for IFX (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.90) for ADL (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Calculated % bias was −14.09 (95% Limits of agreement, LoA, −52.83 to 24.66) for IFX and 15.79 (LoA −37.14 to 68.73) for ADL. For the evaluation of total anti-IFX antibodies, we did not collect sufficient data to establish a statistically significant correlation between AFIAS and ELISA. The inter-rater agreement showed a “substantial” and a “moderate” agreement for IFX and ADL, respectively. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our results show that the AFIAS assay has an accuracy and analytical performance comparable to that of the ELISA method used for TDM of IFX and ADL. Therefore, the introduction of this device into routine clinical practice could provide results more quickly and with similar accuracy as ELISA, allowing clinicians to rapidly formulate clinical decisions.
ISSN:1999-4923